search for: necessarilly

...tom intrinsics and hopefully without interfering with the optimizer. > > What do you think about this? There's been talk of adding metata do the branch that terminates the loop latch block. What llvm calls the "latch" is just a unique backward branch to the loop header and not necessarilly even a loop exit. I'm not sure how you would interpret that metadata, since the branch exit may be rewritten (just like the loop guard). For example, the indvars pass may convert it into a != test. As long as this is brainstorming time, I actually like the idea of an llvm.invariant intrinsic...

On 02/08/2013 06:56 AM, Andrew Trick wrote: > There's been talk of adding metata do the branch that terminates the loop latch block. What llvm calls the "latch" is just a unique backward branch to the loop header and not necessarilly even a loop exit. > > I'm not sure how you would interpret that metadata, since the branch exit may be rewritten (just like the loop guard). For example, the indvars pass may convert it into a != test. > > As long as this is brainstorming time, I actually like the idea of an llvm.in...

> Thanks for the details. Please add them to a bug report. I will do this. > InstCombine is certainly interfering with our ability to analyze the loop. I think the problem is that ScalarEvolution cannot reason about signed division. This is a general problem independent of your target. At the moment I'm not sure if we can teach ScalarEvolution to reason about this, or if we can defer

...sts' make: *** [check] error 2" What's the mean of the error messeage listed up? Why it happens in my computer? Which kind of problems is it, software's or hardware's? I just ignored the mistakes, as it says in your installation manual that this kind of failures "is not necessarilly problems as they might be caused by missing functionality", until I met with the following problem. The second bug occured when I was doing some ordinary statistical work. Suppose v1 is a numerical vector of length(v1)==20; further suppose > v1 <- c(1:20). When I type the command >...

The following patch swaps the command line handling of kinit. It seems apparent that, if one were to call kinit like so: kinit root=/foo/bar They would be attempting to override the /proc/cmdline. As it stands, kinit parses the /proc/cmdline *first*, meaning the above does not work. Just for a simple use case: User A has an encrypted root device, root=/dev/hda3 Some init scripts detect this,

...erfering with the > > optimizer. > > > > What do you think about this? > > There's been talk of adding metata do the branch that terminates the > loop latch block. What llvm calls the "latch" is just a unique > backward branch to the loop header and not necessarilly even a loop > exit. > > I'm not sure how you would interpret that metadata, since the branch > exit may be rewritten (just like the loop guard). For example, the > indvars pass may convert it into a != test. > > As long as this is brainstorming time, I actually like the i...

I am trying to come up with a workable solution in managing numerous Mac workstations allowing a high degree of flexibility with regards to certs. My puppet environment is setup to application installation on machines that have been ''imaged'' with a base OS and the puppet and facter apps. So, when a Mac is ''imaged'' and subsequently re-booted, puppet is run at