search for: necesarily

...ternal SIP extension). 3.- Once both channel have answered, connect the call between them. This way, I can, for example, play audios in both channels before they are connected between each other. So my question is: Does anybody figures out a way to do this? If I use Manager/Originate, the call necesarily needs a channel to be picked up (the originating channel) before the call can be placed. What I'd like to do is: Asterisk -> Channel 1 and do something in channel 1 Asterisk -> Channel 2 and do something in channel 2 Bridge both channels: Channel 1 <----> Channel 2 Is maybe &qu...

...s since 1 Jan 1970.) And another time class POSIXtm which is an R list giving a struct tm (secs, mins, hours, day of month, month, year, day of week, day of year). (I think it also needs to record the timezone used.) Then we can have R functions as vectorized wrappers for the POSIX functions (not necesarily with these names) time (say Sys.date): date() as a POSIXtime variable. localtime / gmtime: convert POSIXtime to POSIXtm (local TZ/UTC) mktime: convert POSIXtm to POSIXtime strftime: convert POSIXtm to character string, flexibly. difftime: difference between ti...

Beyond any more general questions of whether pam sessions *should* be run as root, is there an immediate security concern with moving the pam_open_session (and pam_setcred) stuff to the parent (root) process? (E.g., via the patch below.) -- Mike Stone diff -u -r1.4 auth-pam.c --- auth-pam.c 25 Jun 2002 00:45:33 -0000 1.4 +++ auth-pam.c 25 Jun 2002 20:33:41 -0000 @@ -286,6 +286,8 @@

...ls into a > meetme conference, then add your third channel (see the local channel > driver) which simply plays whatever audio you need (or in fact this > could be some AGI/etc)... > > These are just some comments I felt like making, I've never had to do > this, and this is not necesarily how I would do it if I did need to (ie, > if I was being paid to do this, I'd think about it more before > implementing it, but for now, I can shoot my mouth off without any > concern of needing to deliver on what I've said can be done). Thanks for the shooting :) I need to do thi...

>A "rough and tumble" player that can be distributed with content to >allow for those people lacking a more functional player isn't a bad idea >at all. > Thanks. > There is a lot of complexity associated with it, though. Even if >you elect to just have a command-line player, there's still the audio >interface to deal with. > >Not impossible, just

Hi, Curt Brune wrote: > At the risk of contributing to the 'urban legends' and the 'salads' I apologize to all communities who hand out correct info. :)) > http://lukeluo.blogspot.com/2013/06/grub-how-to-2-make-boot-able-iso-with.html Well, the excursion on CD-DA is off topic and i would describe many aspects in different terms. Nice to see that at least one person read

Why does this not include? I have tried many variations including adding an exclude command. Includes.txt: + //aBackup/* + //apic/* - /* rsync --verbose --progress --stats -vv --recursive -e "ssh -p 2423" --include-from=includes.txt rsynchost: add_exclude(+ //aBackup/*.*) add_exclude(+ //apic/*) add_exclude(- /*) user@rsynchost's password: receiving file list ... add_exclude(+

Hi list Several people have physical access to my FreeBSD box and I have the feeling that somebody try to get access with boot -s options . Can I log activity after boot -s option (change user password, install software and etc.). I use boot -s and change user password, but after reboot i can't find this atcivity in log files. The BSD box is shutdown and run again many time at day. Best

I can't seem to figure out how to setup a public IP for the VM so we could use it as a second public webserver. The host machine runs our primary webserver with CentOS 6.9 and one public ipv4 address configured on physical interface eth0. Now i have configured a new bridge interface br0: DEVICE=br0 TYPE=Bridge BOOTPROTO=static The IP settings are for a second public ipv4 address in the

...rtition boot sector? 2. EFI option only appear when a partition has the esp flag. Probably related, with the esp flag the partition is NOT automounted on my Ubuntu machine, I need to mount it by hand using the "mount" command. 3. The /EFI/boot/bootx64.efi path is the fallback one, but not necesarily the one needed to boot. In fact, my Ubuntu system on the MacBook doesn't have it (and it boot using EFI...). 4. The syslinux.efi executable is searched on the EFI partition, at least from /EFI/boot to /EFI to / the same way that happens with the syslinux.cfg file (that it was always on the root...

Package: xen-utils-common Version: 4.1.4-3+deb7u1 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, i changed toolkit to xl, after that i observe that my domU started as HVM domains. I found same problem here: http://mail-index.netbsd.org/port-xen/2012/04/11/msg007216.html When i manualy setup loop devices and specify it as disks in my VM conf file, domU started as PV. -- System Information: Debian Release: 7.1

On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 7:39 AM, Fabian Arrotin <arrfab at centos.org> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 23/09/15 08:00, C. L. Martinez wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Is it possible to upgrade intel X11 org driver on CentOS7?? Maybe >> with elrepo's packages: >>

Hello list, I have several SPA-2000's and 3000's scattered about the Internet (all behind NATs). Because I do not qualify as an ITSP, Sipura will not license their "Sipura Profile Compiler" so that I can have the units remote upgrade, remote re-configure, etc (via TFTP or HTTP). This is extremely annoying. Right now if I have to make a config change to any of these

...2. EFI option only appear when a partition has the esp flag. Probably > related, with the esp flag the partition is NOT automounted on my > Ubuntu machine, I need to mount it by hand using the "mount" command. > 3. The /EFI/boot/bootx64.efi path is the fallback one, but not > necesarily the one needed to boot. In fact, my Ubuntu system on the > MacBook doesn't have it (and it boot using EFI...). > 4. The syslinux.efi executable is searched on the EFI partition, at > least from /EFI/boot to /EFI to / the same way that happens with the > syslinux.cfg file (that it wa...

I have been doing a lot of reading forums and elsewhere but am somehow unable to connect the dots. Here is what I am trying to accomplish initially and then wish for it to grow bigger from here on. I have two POTS (Analog) line that would connect to the Asterisk Box. I have, to begin with 5 IP phones (PoE), all connected to a switch. Asterisk Box with a LAN card also connects to the same switch.

All-- su cannot be run without trusting the shell. The shell cannot be trusted without trusting any instructions the shell uses, from library calls to rc scripts. Hell, the instructions the shell uses can't even be trusted, since they're all living in userspace memory. By contrast, SSHD is generally a root owned, highly secure environment with no unpriveledged userspace

Hi all, I have a home server based on SNV_127 with 8 disks; 2 x 500GB mirrored root pool 6 x 1TB raidz2 data pool This server performs a few functions; NFS : for several ''lab'' ESX virtual machines NFS : mythtv storage (videos, music, recordings etc) Samba : for home directories for all networked PCs I backup the important data to external USB hdd each day. I previously had

Hi, In "Agilge Web Development With Rails" on page 217, an example of foreign keys is shown. I am however unable to find a definition of wheater the naming of the index is significant. On the above mentioned page, this line is shown in the example: constraint fk_items_product foreign key (product_id) references products(id) In "fk_items_product", "items" is

Greetings, In looking for inexpensive JBOD and/or RAID solutions to use with ZFS, I''ve run across the recent "VTrak" SAS/SATA systems from Promise Technologies, specifically their E-class and J-class series: E310f FC-connected RAID: http://www.promise.com/product/product_detail_eng.asp?product_id=175 E310s SAS-connected RAID:

On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 12:39 PM, Friedman, Eli <efriedma at codeaurora.org> wrote: On 3/3/2017 11:51 AM, Daniel Berlin via llvm-dev wrote: So i have a testcase (see PR31792, and cond_br2.llin GVN) that current GVN can simplify because it replaces instructions as it goes. It's an example of a larger issue that pops up quite a lot I would appreciate thoughts on what to do about it it