search for: naylor

Doh forgot to cc -----Original message----- > From:Stuart Naylor <stuartiannaylor at thursbygarden.org> > Sent: Tuesday 8th April 2014 21:16 > To: G?nter Kukkukk <linux at kukkukk.com> > Subject: RE: [Samba] DNS record info (samba-tool) > > Brilliant, glad about that as zones pretty much done on set up and no worry about a restart. &g...

...ng this for NYSE holidays > but for power industry holidays and made a version to handle those > changes as well as some other idiosyncracies. Thanks for the > suggestion though. > > > > Message: 5 > > Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 16:51:49 -0400 > > From: "Charles Naylor" <Charles.Naylor@nikkoam.com > <mailto:Charles.Naylor@nikkoam.com>> > > Subject: Re: [R-SIG-Finance] holidayNYSE missing some > > To: <r-sig-finance@stat.math.ethz.ch > <mailto:r-sig-finance@stat.math.ethz.ch>> > > Message-ID: > > <...

Apols but would someone please forward some info on this. I want to connect to samba4 and all I can seem to find are results of the now non existent configuration script. I think you might start to find an increase on uptake and the removal might of been premature? Make me happy anyway as confused at the moment. Stuart

Hi, Confused and bewildered as usual, so ask the guys who know. samba4wins is now implemented and part of the samba4 package? Is there a configuration guide? I guess nbd_server needs to be part of the equation so could you point to some resources on setup as I don't think I have noticed anything in the wiki? Probably just me :) Many Thanks Stuart

...s = btrfs on a btrfs disk then it doesn't If you try the above without vfs objects = btrfs on a btrfs disk then it does work. Anybody tried that yet? -----Original message----- > From:Bjoern Baumbach <bb at sernet.de> > Sent: Thursday 17th April 2014 11:36 > To: Stuart Naylor <stuartiannaylor at thursbygarden.org>; samba at samba.org > Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba 4.0.17 Available for Download > > Hi Stuart, > > On 04/16/2014 09:24 PM, Stuart Naylor wrote: > > Many thanks Sernet Guys > > You're welcome :-) > > > as I will...

...taticIP monuser at slavestaticIP If yourself or anyone could please advise if this should work or if I need something different in my hosts.allow file Thank you very much once again. On 25 November 2016 at 12:00, Roger Price <roger at rogerprice.org> wrote: > On Fri, 25 Nov 2016, Jonah Naylor wrote: > > I don't think nut is built with TCP wrappers support, although the package >> is listed as depending on libwrap... >> > > Why would you have such a dependency if nut didn't use TCP Wrappers? > > I ran this command: ldd /sbin/upsd | grep libwrap.so an...

I ended up installing a newer version of GNU gcc and this time it worked. Thanks, Jim Naylor Unix/Storage Systems Administrator Schnuck Markets, Inc. * Direct (314) 994-4784 ))( Cell (314) 691-0186 Fax (314) 994-4684 * E-Mail jnaylor@schnucks.com -----Original Message----- From: rsync-bounces+jnaylor=schnucks.com@lists.samba.org [mailto:rsync-bounces+jnaylor=schnucks.com...

Hi can anyone please help. I have two linux servers both with static IPs not using NAT. My slave can't connect to my host. Whatever I try. I have the same setup also on my LAN with two other machines and they talk to each other and work great. But my two machines with their own static IPs don't want to play. I've used the same settings for these as I have on my LAN, with a master

Hi can anyone please help. Although I have two servers in the same cabinet/room and sharing the same UPS - they're on different networks. I've tried everything I can find online, but whatever I do I can't get the slave nut client to connect to the master. When testing then on the same LAN, they DO work - but how do I allow the IP of the slave to connect to the master when both on

...#39;m not too sure if TCP wrappers are there or available... This could be the problem, am I still able to add the wrappers in with prebuilt packages? Thanks very much once again. :) On 24 November 2016 at 21:51, Roger Price <roger at rogerprice.org> wrote: > On Thu, 24 Nov 2016, Jonah Naylor wrote: > > The servers can ping each other... The router log doesn't show anything >> and I am the admin for the servers. The machines firewalls allow each >> other's ips etc. Part of the issue is possibly that I just don't know if >> I've set up NUT correctl...

Try ALL:ALL in /etc/hosts.allow temporarily. If that still doesn't work, it's likely something else. If it does, only then screw with creating narrow rules . . . - Tim On November 25, 2016 6:37:02 AM CST, Roger Price <roger at rogerprice.org> wrote: >On Fri, 25 Nov 2016, Jonah Naylor wrote: > >> upsd : ipaddressofclientgoeshere > >If it were me I would write > > upsd : ipaddressofclient :\ > spawn (/bin/mail -r hosts.allow at localhost\ > -s '%s@%h accepted access to %d from %c'\ > sysadmin at so...

...orking. Also should the "allowfrom = clientIPaddresshere" line be in my monuser entry in upsd.users on the master, or should I take that out? Thanks once again for the help. On 25 November 2016 at 12:37, Roger Price <roger at rogerprice.org> wrote: > On Fri, 25 Nov 2016, Jonah Naylor wrote: > > upsd : ipaddressofclientgoeshere >> > > If it were me I would write > > upsd : ipaddressofclient :\ > spawn (/bin/mail -r hosts.allow at localhost\ > -s '%s@%h accepted access to %d from %c'\ > sysadmin...

...command: ldd /sbin/upsd | grep libwrap.so and it has returned no output. Does this mean I have to compile from source or is there a way to add the tcp wrapper support? Thanks again. On 24 November 2016 at 22:40, Roger Price <roger at rogerprice.org> wrote: > On Thu, 24 Nov 2016, Jonah Naylor wrote: > > I installed Nut via apt-get, not from source (which I'd rather stick with >> if possible just for ease of security updates etc) - so I'm not too sure if >> TCP wrappers are there or available... >> >> This could be the problem, am I still able to add...

...ion in smb.conf for server side copies. > Then you seem unable to remove and change the default groups. > > Stuart > > > -----Original message----- > > From:Marc Muehlfeld <samba at marc-muehlfeld.de> > > Sent: Sunday 13th April 2014 9:50 > > To: Stuart Naylor <stuartiannaylor at thursbygarden.org>; samba at lists.samba.org > > Subject: Re: [Samba] SeDiskOperatorPrivilege > > > > Hello Stuard, > > > > Am 13.04.2014 04:31, schrieb Stuart Naylor: > > > With http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/ Setting_up_a_home_sh...

ldbsearch -H /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb '(&(objectclass=person)(name=Administrator))' name unicodePwd # record 1 dn: CN=Administrator,CN=Users,DC=office,DC=zentyal,DC=lan name: Administrator unicodePwd:: kXh1DQFudwnw+lnHhubyUw== http://www.hashkiller.co.uk/ntlm-decrypter.aspx just took 242ms to return my password Only zent1 as its just a VM running a test of Zentyal3.5

As soon as I add the declaration for server side copies I hit problems with disk permissions. Same as in 4.1.6 and always the same so I will not bother to add a log. If you follow http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setting_up_a_home_share But have vfs objects = btrfs declared all is different. You can add users and groups but the default Everyone, CREATOR GROUP and a Unknown you just can't

...Stuart -----Original message----- > From:Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny at googlemail.com> > Sent: Thursday 17th July 2014 11:14 > To: samba at lists.samba.org > Subject: Re: [Samba] Must Samba4 AD be provisionned with rfc2307 to use winbind ? > > On 17/07/14 00:26, Stuart Naylor wrote: > > I have been reading through an old thread and to be honest confused.com > > > > > > root at zent1:~# samba-tool domain level show > > params.c:pm_process() - Processing configuration file "/etc/samba/shares.conf" > > ldb_wrap open of secrets....

On Dec 29, 2015, at 6:33 AM, Jonah Naylor <jonahnaylor at gmail.com> wrote: > > HI thanks for replying and helping. > > I've now ran the UPS down a few times from full charge to test and I don't think it's the batteries or a problem with the UPS itself. I can watch it go from 100% right down to 1% over 20 mi...

On Mon, 12 Sep 2016, Jonah Naylor wrote: > I have two linux servers both with static IPs not using NAT. This is rather ambiguous. I'm going to guess that you mean they have public IANA issued IPs that you are trying to use for nut. > My slave can't connect to my host. Whatever I try. That would be a sensible defa...

On Thu, 24 Nov 2016, Jonah Naylor wrote: > I installed Nut via apt-get, not from source (which I'd rather stick > with if possible just for ease of security updates etc) - so I'm not too > sure if TCP wrappers are there or available... > > This could be the problem, am I still able to add the wrappers in...