Displaying 20 results from an estimated 40 matches for "nat_enable".
2008 Oct 16
2
SIP: difference between Grandstream and Cisco when behind NAT
...ven though in the Grandstream config I have "NAT traversal: no" and
leave "Use NAT IP" blank. All the clever stuff is done automatically
by Asterisk.
However, with the Cisco, that doesn't seem to be the case. I have found
it necessary in the SIPDefault.cnf file to set "nat_enable: 1" and
then specify as nat_address the public address of my router.
Is this normal? What is different between the Grandstream and the Cisco?
Is there any way to avoid having to program the external address into
the Cisco when it is behind NAT?
Thanks in advance for any advice.
Cheers
Tony...
2007 Dec 07
2
7960 Won't Register Yet Multiple Attempts?
Hi List,
I've got a 7960 that's behind NAT (nat_enabled: 1 and
nat_received_processing: 1) and for whatever reason doesn't seem to
register, or at least hold a registration. If both the phone and the
router (netgear) are rebooted, the phone will register, take a few
incoming/outgoing calls no problems, then a few hours later, it drops the
registrat...
2005 Feb 09
6
Cisco 7960 Beating a Dead Horse
...emergency_port: "5060"
# Backup Proxy info
proxy_backup: "10.6.0.223"
proxy_backup_port: "5060"
# Outbound Proxy info
outbound_proxy: "10.6.0.223"
outbound_proxy_port: "5060"
proxy_register: 1
timer_register_expires : 120
# NAT/Firewall Traversal
nat_enable: "1"
nat_address: ""
voip_control_port: "5060"
start_media_port: "16384"
end_media_port: "32766"
nat_received_processing: "1"
# Phone Label (Text desired to be displayed in upper right corner)
phone_label: "Garrett - "...
2004 Dec 15
3
Newbie: Problem with two-interface setup
Hi
I have a problem with Shorewall on my two-interface connection. I run
Debian unstable. The setup looks like this:
Internet -------- router ------- server
213.237.12.137 192.168.1.3 192.168.1.2
192.168.0.7 --- local net
192.168.0.{...}
I can ping the server from the local net, and the local net from the
2006 Jan 06
1
Aastra 9133i and NAT: Can it work?
...AN. The Asterisk server is
hosted offsite and has a public IP address.
I've set up port-forwarding on the firewall for both phones to tunnel
the SIP messages initiated by the Asterisk box. It works like a charm
with the Cisco phone by using the following config info:
voip_control_port: 5077
nat_enable: 1
nat_address: ""
nat_received_processing: 0
Every time the Cisco phone registers with Asterisk, it does so using
port 5077 and with the corresponding port-forwarding rule added to the
firewall, it works great. However, for the life of me, I can't get the
Aastra to do the same thin...
2006 Feb 28
10
A room full of Cisco 7960s behind NAT
...: dialplan
messages_uri: 3688
telnet_level: 2
phone_label: "Nat One"
line1_name: 3115552368
line1_shortname: 3115552368
line1_authname: 3115552368
line1_password: 3115552368
line1_displayname: "Nat One"
logo_url: "http://192.168.1.45/pts.bmp"
nat_address: 64.169.xx.xxx
nat_enable: 1
nat_received_processing: 1
proxy1_address: myserver.outthere.com
My NatTwo phone is similar. The only difference is the name/password using
8115552368.
----sip.conf-------------
[3115552368]
type=friend
host=dynamic
username=3115552368
secret=3115552368
nat=1
context=wholesale9
disallow=all
a...
2010 Mar 27
4
Cisco 7960 become UNREACHABLE behind pix firewall
...e only way to make the phones recover is to clear the NAT
translation tables for the phones on the PIX (clear xlate...)
Does anyone know how to fix this? As you can imagine, it is quite
annoying. And it does not happen to all the phones either.
sip fixup is enabled on the PIX
phone config parts:
nat_enable : 1
nat_received_processing : 0
nat_address: [public ip of PIX]
Thank you.
-- James
(Please CC me on all replies)
2003 Jul 21
0
Shorewall 1.4.6
...ions, an undocumented feature allowed entries in
the host file as follows:
z eth1:192.168.1.0/24,eth2:192.168.2.0/24
This capability was never documented and has been removed in 1.4.6
to allow entries of the following format:
z eth1:192.168.1.0/24,192.168.2.0/24
2) The NAT_ENABLED, MANGLE_ENABLED and MULTIPORT options have been
removed from /etc/shorewall/shorewall.conf. These capabilities are
now automatically detected by Shorewall (see below).
New Features:
1) A ''newnotsyn'' interface option has been added. This option may be
specified in /etc/...
2011 May 28
8
Cisco registration problem with 1.8.3.3
I am having a problem registering my cisco phones which is exactly like that
described in
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/2011-May/262306.html
except that I am on Asterisk 1.8.3.3 and using sip level POS3-07-4-00
The symptoms are:
o 7960 lines show [X]
o Outbound calls can be made from the phone, including call pickup of inbound
calls, but not to it.
o Trace shows REGISTER
2003 Jun 29
3
Snapshot 20030629
...combination of a DNAT-rule and one or more ACCEPT rules. That
technique is still preferable for load-balancing over a large number
of servers (> 16) since specifying a range in the DNAT rule causes
one filter table ACCEPT rule to be generated for each IP address in
the range.
5) The NAT_ENABLED, MANGLE_ENABLED and MULTIPORT configuration options
have been removed and have been replaced by code that detects
whether these capabilities are present in the current kernel. The
output of the start, restart and check commands have been enhanced
to report the outcome:
Shorewall ha...
2008 Oct 15
1
Cisco 7960 not always receiving incoming calls
...cnf
image_version: P0S3-08-9-00
proxy1_address: neocipher.net ; Can be dotted IP or FQDN
proxy_register: 1
messages_uri: "100"
phone_password: "cisco" ; Limited to 31 characters (Default - cisco)
sntp_server: 10.10.10.1
time_zone: EST
dial_template: DIALPLAN
nat_enable: 1
nat_address: 172.16.2.1
nat_received_processing: 1
outbound_proxy_port: 5060
outbond_proxy: ns1.neocipher.net
SIP0112B9EAFF72.cnf
image_version: P0S3-08-9-00
# Line 1 Setup
line1_name: 101
line1_authname: 101
line1_shortname: "Line 101"
line1_password: "test"
line1_display...
2005 Feb 11
10
Odd proxy problems
Hi people,
I am running the latest version of Debian ''Sarge''. I have installed hopefully the latest version of
shorewall, as followed by the website. The firewall has been installed with no problems, runs ok,
but I have found a strange problem, maybe it me *shrug*
My setup:
Internet<-->cablemodem<-->Debainfirewall<-->hub<-->windowspc
I am cable, and
2003 Jun 17
3
newbie needs SIP config examples -- especially soft phones
Hi,
I'm experimenting with the dev kit lite and now past the USB
unpleasantness it's working great with standard phones and
lines.
The priority right now is getting soft phones (under Windows
XP) working well.
So far, I've only been able to get the XTEN Lite phone working
and I really don't understand how I set it up. I used "xten"
for every option everywhere (display
2004 Sep 25
4
Cisco PIX and Asterisk
I cannot get incoming calls to sip phones behind a PIX to work, outgoing
is fine.
Asterisk (Public IP) --> Internet --> PIX (NAT) --> Sip Phones
I have tried no fixup protocol sip, I have punched a hole in the Pix
allowing anything from the Asterisk box into the network, still no
incoming.
I have done all the Wiki suggests in regarding to NAT.
Is their a trick getting the
2005 Jul 26
2
7960 SIP Firmware Upgrade Strange Problem
...proxy_emergency: "10.150.200.165"
proxy_emergency_port: "5060"
# Backup Proxy info
proxy_backup: "10.150.200.165"
proxy_backup_port: "5060"
# Outbound Proxy info
outbound_proxy: ""
outbound_proxy_port: "5060"
# NAT/Firewall Traversal
nat_enable: "0"
nat_address: ""
voip_control_port: "5061"
start_media_port: "16384"
end_media_port: "32766"
nat_received_processing: "0"
# Proxy Registration (0-disable (default), 1-enable)
proxy_register: "1"
# Phone Registration Expi...
2003 Jun 27
1
More re: Snapshot 20030627
...wall to add aliases to other than the first subnet on an
interface.
6) Add support for load-balancing.
7) Toned down the disclaimer for the ''check'' command.
8) Implemented support for the Connection Tracking Match extension in
iptables 1.2.8/Kernel 2.4.21.
9) Removed the NAT_ENABLED and MANGLE_ENABLED configuration parameters
and replaced them with code that detects these capabilities.
-Tom
--
Tom Eastep \ Shorewall - iptables made easy
Shoreline, \ http://www.shorewall.net
Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net
2004 Aug 01
0
Re: shorewall.conf note
...In the QuickStart Guides, you will find:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If you are using the Debian package, please check your shorewall.conf
file to ensure that the following are set correctly; if they are not,
change them appropriately:
* NAT_ENABLED=Yes (Shorewall versions earlier than 1.4.6)
* IP_FORWARDING=On
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I really don''t know where to repeat this information in the
documentation. Seems wrong to include a section in the Upgrade article
saying:...
2004 Jul 21
0
Cisco 7960, multiple registrations, and NAT
...7960 phone at
another location. This one is on a private LAN, and uses NAT to get out on to
the Internet.
I have been successful in registering the 7960 to the local * server. There's
no NAT here, so it's easy.
I have registered the phone to the remote * server (using nat=yes in *, and
nat_enable plus nat_received_processing on the 7960). This works fine too.
BUT, I want a line button on the local * box, plus a line button on the
remote * box. This works too, for a while. After a short while, usually once
I've completed a call to/from the remote * box, the phone starts dishing out
its...
2005 Jan 24
0
Asterisk v1.0.1 Cisco 7960 Sip v7.3
...n Password
# Emergency Proxy info
proxy_emergency: ""
proxy_emergency_port: "5060"
# Backup Proxy info
proxy_backup: ""
proxy_backup_port: "5060"
# Outbound Proxy info
outbound_proxy: ""
outbound_proxy_port: ""
# NAT/Firewall Traversal
nat_enable: "1"
nat_address: "64.123.190.68"
voip_control_port: "5060"
start_media_port: "16000"
end_media_port: "32768"
nat_received_processing: "1"
# Phone Label (Text desired to be displayed in upper right corner)
phone_label: "Home "...
2003 Jun 27
0
Snapshot 20030637
...combination of a DNAT-rule and one or more ACCEPT rules. That
technique is still preferable for load-balancing over a large number
of servers (> 16) since specifying a range in the DNAT rule causes
one filter table ACCEPT rule to be generated for each IP address in
the range.
5) The NAT_ENABLED and MANGLE_ENABLED configuration options have been
removed and have been replaced by code that detects whether these
capabilities are present in the current kernel. The output of the
start, restart and check commands have been enhanced to report the
outcome:
Shorewall has detected...