search for: narky

how to set a maximum length for text area in rails -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email

Im using a parameterized class in my site.pp: class development($user) { class{"basenode": user => $user} class{"nodejs": user => $user} include "coffeescript" include "ruby" } This class defines nodejs class that epects a user as input: class nodejs($user) { class {"nodejs::npm": user => $user} $node_ver =

> -----Original Message----- > From: Michael S. Tsirkin [mailto:mst at redhat.com] > Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2017 7:23 PM > To: Lior Narkis <liorn at mellanox.com> > Cc: virtio-dev at lists.oasis-open.org; virtualization at lists.linux-foundation.org > Subject: Re: [virtio-dev] packed ring layout proposal v2 > > On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 06:00:45AM +0000, Lior Narkis

> -----Original Message----- > From: Michael S. Tsirkin [mailto:mst at redhat.com] > Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2017 7:23 PM > To: Lior Narkis <liorn at mellanox.com> > Cc: virtio-dev at lists.oasis-open.org; virtualization at lists.linux-foundation.org > Subject: Re: [virtio-dev] packed ring layout proposal v2 > > On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 06:00:45AM +0000, Lior Narkis

On 10/02/2019 07:38, Ralph Seichter via dovecot wrote: > * Juri Haberland via dovecot: > >> Blindly enabling DMARC checks without thinking about the consequences >> for themselves should not be the problem of other well behaving >> participants. > > Can you judge if DMARC is enabled "blindly"? No, I thought not. Also, > the issue was not on the

...matic, do work it needs to look for specific list type hidden headers, spammers and nasties will incorporate those headers into their trash that impersonates mailing lists and voila, they pass. there is no quick and easy fix to the dmarc mess other than p=none aspf=s (DKIM is another one that gets narky at lists, and despite all the spf haters dreams, I've never had a problem with spf and lists, and we were an early beta adopter of spf) -- Kind Regards, Noel Butler This Email, including any attachments, may contain legally privileged information, therefore remains confidential and su...

> -----Original Message----- > From: virtio-dev at lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:virtio-dev at lists.oasis-open.org] > On Behalf Of Michael S. Tsirkin > Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2017 5:20 AM > To: virtio-dev at lists.oasis-open.org > Cc: virtualization at lists.linux-foundation.org > Subject: [virtio-dev] packed ring layout proposal v2 > > This is an update from v1

On Sun, Jul 16, 2017 at 06:00:45AM +0000, Lior Narkis wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: virtio-dev at lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:virtio-dev at lists.oasis-open.org] > > On Behalf Of Michael S. Tsirkin > > Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2017 5:20 AM > > To: virtio-dev at lists.oasis-open.org > > Cc: virtualization at lists.linux-foundation.org >

This is an update from v1 version. Changes: - update event suppression mechanism - separate options for indirect and direct s/g - lots of new features --- Performance analysis of this is in my kvm forum 2016 presentation. The idea is to have a r/w descriptor in a ring structure, replacing the used and available ring, index and descriptor buffer. * Descriptor ring: Guest adds descriptors with

This is an update from v1 version. Changes: - update event suppression mechanism - separate options for indirect and direct s/g - lots of new features --- Performance analysis of this is in my kvm forum 2016 presentation. The idea is to have a r/w descriptor in a ring structure, replacing the used and available ring, index and descriptor buffer. * Descriptor ring: Guest adds descriptors with