search for: snarky

Hi, Why is it that polymorphic associations only work with the :has_many and :belongs_to relationships? Why can''t it be a :has_one? Matt

...s yours. Why not say what SHOULD be done? Since we were discussing logging, including only the lines about logging seem to be a reasonable response to the original open-ended question. ?Please include the complete output of ?dovecot -n?? would get your point across instead of just letting you be a snarky ass. On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 1:14 PM Odhiambo Washington <odhiambo at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 19 March 2018 at 22:45, @lbutlr <kremels at kreme.com> wrote: > >> On 2018-03-19 (13:19 MDT), Odhiambo Washington <odhiambo at gmail.com> >> wrote: >> &g...

...s it using the FileCheck tool. The usage of grep in RUN lines is > discouraged." > > However, perhaps it's time to remove any mention of grep from that document? > "Usage of grep in RUN lines will result in your patch being reverted." ;) If you can think of a less snarky way of saying something along those lines, it'd be great. I'm more than a bit surprised the docs still talk about it at all, honestly. FileCheck has been the One True Way(™) for quite a while now. -Jim

...real loop optimizations"? > I think most readers here will understand what I mean. I can go find specific chapters of textbooks if it's unclear. Maybe the word "real" could be replaced with traditional, well tested, industry standard or something else. (ok I'll stop being snarky) I really do appreciate your feedback and I do think something beyond just a soft discussion is required on the IP/license vetting. The relicense process used before should be substantially similar to the process which LLVM is going to use. There's a big difference between someone randomly cha...

...rites: > >> Hmm...it's a build system, right? There's not much to add, really. >> Build systems should be really simple. All they need is dependencies >> and rules to build stuff. > > Oh, yes, sure, you're right. <g> Can't tell if you're being snarky or not... >> What sorts of features can you imagine we'd want to add? > > That's a question for Daniel. He is who's saying that his proposal will > make the build(s) more flexible, extensible, etc. Er? This is your statement, isn't it? > In fact, as your prop...

...ses" like following - > > %b.1 = bitcast i32 4 to i32 ; <i32> [#uses=8] %11 > = add i32 %a.1, %b.1 ; <i32> > [#uses=1]Instruction does not dominate all uses! > > > Any idea, what is wrong with this? > Not to be snarky, but the problem is that the definition of b.1 does not dominate the use of b.1 in the add instruction. This may be due to two reasons: 1) The instructions are in the same basic block, but they're in the wrong order. The definition of b.1 follows the use of it in the add instruction. If...

...;? >> > > I think most readers here will understand what I mean. I can go find > specific chapters of textbooks if it's unclear. Maybe the word "real" could > be replaced with traditional, well tested, industry standard or something > else. (ok I'll stop being snarky) > > > That's what I thought you meant. No, I believe there's not a conflict. In > fact, this will provide infrastructure to make this easier. While you can > handle a bunch of these as one problem using this kind of framework, you > don't need to do so. > By this...

...he usage of grep in RUN lines is >> discouraged." >> >> However, perhaps it's time to remove any mention of grep from that document? >> > > "Usage of grep in RUN lines will result in your patch being reverted." ;) > > If you can think of a less snarky way of saying something along those lines, it'd be great. I'm more than a bit surprised the docs still talk about it at all, honestly. FileCheck has been the One True Way(™) for quite a while now. > How about "Please do not submit/commit test patches that use grep" and wipe ou...

Hi, I am trying to write a small pass. In my pass, I have inserted some instruction and used that in another. But, during OPT it is showing "Instruction does not dominate all uses" like following - %b.1 = bitcast i32 4 to i32 ; <i32> [#uses=8] %11 = add i32 %a.1, %b.1 ; <i32> [#uses=1]Instruction does not dominate all uses! Any

I''m stymied at how to create a fixture that establishes a has_many :through relationship. I''ve watched the railscast at: http://media.railscasts.com/videos/081_fixtures_in_rails_2.mov ... but that''s for HABTM relationships. I''ve read: http://www.ruby-forum.com/topic/145676 but that ultimately doesn''t answer any question. So with no further ado:

Hi Dmitry, Where were you expecting notice to have been given? If I recall correctly, the obsolescence of the C backend was mentioned many times on this mailing list, and as Owen notes, in the release notes since 2.8. I'm not trying to be snarky. You were obviously genuinely surprised by its removal, and that makes me wonder if where the core open source devs are expecting people to look for that kind of information isn't lining up with where people actually are looking. -Jim On Apr 19, 2012, at 9:29 AM, Dmitry N. Mikushin <maemar...

...ew testing server setups. There are problems they address, of certain high security environments where you really, really care if someone spoofs your DNS or IP address, but the resulting blocked communications are far more likely to be blocking legitimate traffic, not intruders. I'm also a bit snarky about the time spent to set up the service, publish the relevant root certificates generally and adjust the ssh_config settings, time far better spent elsewhere.

...t;> >> Ok, thanks! I'm not dealing with UTF-8 so I don't think Process::GetEnv >> will work. I was looking for something that caches calls to getenv so >> checks could be put into tight(-ish) loops without too much performance >> impact. > > Sorry for the snarky answer but we already have that: > > // outside of loop > bool enableFooBar = getenv("ENABLE_FOO_BAR"); > while (...) { > // it's not getting re-checked every loop iteration: > enableFooBar; > } > > Generally we don't really look at env vars toda...

Ok, thanks! I'm not dealing with UTF-8 so I don't think Process::GetEnv will work. I was looking for something that caches calls to getenv so checks could be put into tight(-ish) loops without too much performance impact. Would such a utility be of interest to the community? -David Reid Kleckner via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes: >

...m Grosbach <grosbach at apple.com>: > Hi Dmitry, > > Where were you expecting notice to have been given? If I recall correctly, the obsolescence of the C backend was mentioned many times on this mailing list, and as Owen notes, in the release notes since 2.8. I'm not trying to be snarky. You were obviously genuinely surprised by its removal, and that makes me wonder if where the core open source devs are expecting people to look for that kind of information isn't lining up with where people actually are looking. > > -Jim > > On Apr 19, 2012, at 9:29 AM, Dmitry N. M...

Dear all, I've also noticed C backend was removed a little bit... silently. In the end of March I only got open bugs closed by Benjamin Kramer in bugzilla, but they sounded like "decision is made". So the question is: it such silent removal a normal practice? In times of 3.0 release there were long discussions on what to drop and what to preserve, e.g. sparc backend, if I remember

...er discussions : > > * https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2009-December/056022.html > * https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2010-February/056513.html > > I don't see a very compelling conclusion, nor a justification for the > behavior, and I see that it makes some users snarky (second link is an > example), so let me make a case. > > This limitation is an annoyance for bigger projects where we must choose > between having fewer files with too many objects defined (less structure, > more scrolling), or to have too many scripts, often with long prefixed >...

Hi-- Am having trouble with rvm. Successfully installed it, but when I tried to install Ruby 1.8.7, here is the error I got: Paul-Denlingers-MacBook-Pro:~ pdenlinger$ rvm install 1.8.7 -bash: rvm: command not found Tried closing terminal, quitting terminal, opening another tab, etc. but continued to get same error. What to do? Thanks! -- You received this message because you are subscribed

...with UTF-8 so I don't think > Process::GetEnv > >>> will work. I was looking for something that caches calls to getenv so > >>> checks could be put into tight(-ish) loops without too much performance > >>> impact. > >> > >> Sorry for the snarky answer but we already have that: > >> > >> // outside of loop > >> bool enableFooBar = getenv("ENABLE_FOO_BAR"); > >> while (...) { > >> // it's not getting re-checked every loop iteration: > >> enableFooBar; > >> }...

...; > * https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2009-December/056022.html > > * https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2010-February/056513.html > > > > I don't see a very compelling conclusion, nor a justification for the > > behavior, and I see that it makes some users snarky (second link is an > > example), so let me make a case. > > > > This limitation is an annoyance for bigger projects where we must choose > > between having fewer files with too many objects defined (less structure, > > more scrolling), or to have too many scripts, ofte...