search for: narayanaswamy

Yes, I understand. I just don't understand why there are 15 review links. as to the format of the list, we previously had a list of feature for 4.5 (before it was fully supported), we can reuse this old format. Best regards, Alexey Bataev > 6 июня 2019 г., в 19:12, Narayanaswamy, Ravi <ravi.narayanaswamy at intel.com> написал(а): > > Alexey, > Johannes want to put all the features maintained in Kelvin's spreadsheet on the website and track it there. He is not looking for just features which have been worked on. > Thanks > Ravi > > -----...

...>> >> ________________________________ >> From: Jonas Hahnfeld <hahnjo at hahnjo.de<mailto:hahnjo at hahnjo.de>> >> Sent: Thursday, June 6, 2019 2:20:21 AM >> To: Doerfert, Johannes >> Cc: llvm-dev; kli at ca.ibm.com<mailto:kli at ca.ibm.com>; Narayanaswamy, Ravi >> Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Webpage to track implementation status of OpenMP features >> >> Hi Johannnes, >> >> there's http://clang.llvm.org/docs/OpenMPSupport.html. If that page is >> missing some information, they should be added. >> >>...

...Get Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36> ________________________________ From: Jonas Hahnfeld <hahnjo at hahnjo.de<mailto:hahnjo at hahnjo.de>> Sent: Thursday, June 6, 2019 2:20:21 AM To: Doerfert, Johannes Cc: llvm-dev; kli at ca.ibm.com<mailto:kli at ca.ibm.com>; Narayanaswamy, Ravi Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Webpage to track implementation status of OpenMP features Hi Johannnes, there's http://clang.llvm.org/docs/OpenMPSupport.html. If that page is missing some information, they should be added. Jonas On 2019-06-06 05:04, Doerfert, Johannes via llvm-dev wrote: >...

...de_owners.txt file is updated and questions on libomptarget go to the right person then. BTW, the nominee was discussed at the libomptarget developers meeting, and people do agree he is the best candidate. Thanks, Andrey From: Openmp-dev [mailto:openmp-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of Narayanaswamy, Ravi via Openmp-dev Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2018 8:21 PM To: llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>; openmp-dev (openmp-dev at lists.llvm.org) <openmp-dev at lists.llvm.org> Subject: [Openmp-dev] libomptarget code owner. Hi, Currently libomptarget has no code owner. Although...

Hi, Currently libomptarget has no code owner. Although it is part openmp project the expertise required for libomptarget is different from openmp. Georgios Rokos from IBM has agreed to be the owner of libomptarget source, so I would like to nominate Georgios Rokos who is a major contributor to libomptarget. Thanks Ravi -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was

Long story short: We want to create a webpage under llvm.org that shows the implementation status of OpenMP features, similar to https://clang.llvm.org/cxx_status.html . Please let me know if you have wishes, questions, or concerns. Cheers, Johannes

On 04/26/2018 07:03 PM, Narayanaswamy, Ravi wrote: > > Hi Hal, > >    We are not trying to address issues where the object mapped are of > different sizes between host and target with different ABI. > Why are you not trying to address that issue?  -Hal > The issue is when the objects are of same size like double...

Hi Hal, We are not trying to address issues where the object mapped are of different sizes between host and target with different ABI. The issue is when the objects are of same size like double which is 8bytes on both 32bit and 64bit platform. If a double is used in a first_private on a target clause, the 64 bit side will pass it as value whereas on the 32bit side since the value does not

For the firstprivate clause, the compiler generates code to pass it by value or by reference to the outlined function. The reason the first private scalars is generally passed by value is for the performance reason. For this particular case, the compiler cannot generate code to pass the double @gg by value under i386-pc-linux-gnu since the value is 64 bit while the architecture is 32bit. For the

Hi there, I am a newbie to samba. I am developing a cifs proxy (promiscuous mode) which is supposed to perform a proxy authentication (NTLMSSP/NETLOGON) to authenticate the client's against a Win2003 domain. I understand that net ads/winbindd will be my best choice for joining domain/backend communication with domain for authentication (NETLOGON). I was wondering if i can use