search for: nany

On 'factor', I meant the case where 'levels' is not specified, where 'unique' is called. > factor(c(complex(real=NaN), complex(imaginary=NaN))) [1] NaN+0i <NA> Levels: NaN+0i Look at <NA> in the result above. Yes, it happens in earlier versions of R, too. On matching both NA and NaN, another consequence is that length(unique(.)) may depend on order.

That, for example, complex(real=NaN) and complex(imaginary=NaN) are regarded as equal makes it possible that length(unique(as.character(x))) > length(unique(x)) (current code of function 'factor' doesn't expect it). Yes, an argument for the behavior is that NA and NaN are of one kind. On my system, using 32-bit R for Windows from binary from CRAN, the result of sapply(z, match,

With 'z' of length 8 below, or of length 12 previously, one may try sapply(rev(z), match, table = rev(z)) match(rev(z), rev(z)) I found that the two results were different in R devel r70604. A shorter one: > z <- complex(real = c(0,NaN,NaN), imaginary = c(NA,NA,0)) > sapply(z, match, table = z) [1] 1 1 2 > match(z, z) [1] 1 1 3 An explanation of the behavior: With normal

This is an RFC / announcement related to the 2nd part of PR#16885 https://bugs.r-project.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16885 about complex NA's. The (somewhat rare) incompatibility in R's 3.3.0 match() behavior for the case of complex numbers with NA & NaN's {which has been fixed for R 3.3.0 patched in the mean time} triggered some more comprehensive "research". I

Full_Name: Tom Short Version: 2.4.0 OS: Windows XP Submission from: (NULL) (68.236.159.227) It looks like there's a bug in acosh with complex number in windows: > acosh(2) [1] 1.316958 > acosh(2+0i) [1] 0+NaNi This happens for me on Windows XP with the following versions: R version 2.2.0, 2005-10-06, i386-pc-mingw32 R version 2.4.0 (2006-10-03) i386-pc-mingw32 It works fine with

Full_Name: Peter Fortini Version: 2.0.1 OS: Windows 2000 Submission from: (NULL) (65.246.187.164) When the imaginary part of the argument is very large, the complex tangent function returns 0+NaNi. For example, tan(1+1000i)=0+NaNi; it should be 0+1i Easy to fix in complex.c, as the original NaN came from division of sinh and cosh that had reached machine infinity. static void z_tan(Rcomplex

...gured but when I see /dev/dahdi i can only see 240 channels. what could be problem I am using it wanrouter and when I put PRI in new card i only got calls on new line that means one of the card is inactive at same time all the lines and alarms are okay only suspected thing is /dev/dahdi. is there nany setting in linux or kernel level which need to be set for solve this issue. any help appreciated. Thanking You --Dhaval -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20130904/503cdebf/attachment.ht...

The following behaviour (in R 0.62.3) is disturbing: > (0+0i)^2 [1] NaN+NaNi Is it deliberate?? Laimonis Kavalieris -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe" (in the "body", not the subject !) To:

The following behaviour (in R 0.62.3) is disturbing: > (0+0i)^2 [1] NaN+NaNi Is it deliberate?? Laimonis Kavalieris -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.- r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe" (in the "body", not the subject !) To:

Hi This is Anjan and I am creating a module to create a database for oracle 11g. I have a problem to execute a cmd ie sqlplus "/as sysdba" @/home/oracle/cr_$dbn Please tell how to exucute the above cmds through puppet module. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to

I need help from someone who has a working cellsocket, I have received couple email of people who wanted to help, but they just think they know how it supposed to work, but they don't have a working units, and they confused more...I need someone with a working solution to get my cellsocket going.. Thanks!!! Write offlits @ mawise (AT) mail.com -------------- next part --------------

...Name Permission Inherited from Apply to Allow smb_ins (MYDOMAIN/smb_ins) <not inherited> This folder only ****** ACTION: When I try to force the situation returns to the original state with no error checking allow inheritable and/or Replace permissions has no effect on nany combination When I add the user with access right, it is OK ************ Some extract the Samba log level 10 ************ [2008/08/15 12:25:22, 10] smbd/statcache.c:stat_cache_lookup(248) stat_cache_lookup: lookup succeeded for name [jdoe] -> [jdoe] [2008/08/15 12:25:22, 5] smbd/filename...

I've rolled up R-2.1.0.tar.gz a short while ago. This version contains several substantial changes and additions, perhaps most notably the UTF8 and Internationalization changes. See the full list of changes below. You can get it from http://cran.r-project.org/src/base/R-2/R-2.1.0.tar.gz or wait for it to be mirrored at a CRAN site nearer to you. Binaries for various platforms will appear in

I've rolled up R-2.1.0.tar.gz a short while ago. This version contains several substantial changes and additions, perhaps most notably the UTF8 and Internationalization changes. See the full list of changes below. You can get it from http://cran.r-project.org/src/base/R-2/R-2.1.0.tar.gz or wait for it to be mirrored at a CRAN site nearer to you. Binaries for various platforms will appear in