Displaying 20 results from an estimated 36 matches for "nanda".
Did you mean:
nada
2019 Feb 11
1
32 seconds vs 72 minutes -- expected performance difference?
On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 09:29:50 +0530
Saurabh Nanda via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> Does anyone have any idea about this?
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 7:22 AM Saurabh Nanda <saurabhnanda at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Define "lots of files" ? What does ls | wc -l say ?
> >>
>...
2019 Feb 16
2
32 seconds vs 72 minutes -- expected performance difference?
On 16/02/2019 02:43, Saurabh Nanda via samba wrote:
>>> 2) Is this normal -- fs/cifs/smb2misc.c: Calculated size 157 length 156
>>> mismatch mid 11907
>> Could be a bug or miscalculated length + non critical warning, I also
>> see this on master kernel. Either way I doubt it's slowing everything dow...
2019 Feb 08
8
32 seconds vs 72 minutes -- expected performance difference?
## QUESTION
I am sharing a 120GB folder with lots of files via Samba on a LAN (1Gbps
connection).
1) Doing an `ls -lR` on the server (on this folder) takes ~32 seconds,
compared with **72 minutes** on the client. Is this difference in
performance expected (due to network and protocol overhead)?
2) While the client is executing an `ls -lR`, one smbd process on the
server uses about 30-40% of a
2007 Oct 24
1
Problem with file system
While I untar a large archive on xfs , ext3 (ver 1.3 and ver 1.4) file
systems , on ppc processor and kernel ver 2.6.21 , I get an error. Also
sometimes, on ext3 (1.3 and 1.4) the file system goes read-only while
untarring.
The same tar file when untarred on a i386 machine works properly.
ERROR:
--------------
tar: Skipping to next header
gzip: stdin: invalid compressed data--crc error
tar:
2015 May 12
4
Checking for file /7.html
...for file
"/usr/share/icecast2/web/7.html" No such file or directory
I have checked the Icecast sources and couldn't find any file named
7.html, so I was wondering why it's looking for it and where to get it?
I have installed icecast via Ubuntu package manager apt-get.
Cheers
Nandakishor
--
Founder and Lead Developer
24 Hour Kirtan Radio
Bergstrasse 54
8032 Z?rich
Switzerland
Tune in on http://24hourkirtan.fm
24 Hour Kirtan Radio is a Swiss non-profit organization.
2019 Feb 14
3
32 seconds vs 72 minutes -- expected performance difference?
>
> When you provide an exact vers= then no auto-negotiation happens (unless
> you pass "vers=3" which essentially means 3.x: use 3.0 or above). You
> either get the connection or mount fails. None the less, you can dump
> the current SMB ressources managed by the kernel by looking at
> /proc/fs/cifs/DebugData if your kernel is recent enough it should show
> the SMB
2019 Feb 15
3
32 seconds vs 72 minutes -- expected performance difference?
Saurabh Nanda <saurabhnanda at gmail.com> writes:
> 1) Why is the log saying `SMB2` everywhere? Shouldn't it be saying
> `SMB3`?
"SMB3" is mostly marketing, it inherits almost everything from SMB2 hence
why it's often handled by SMB2 code. You will see this in Samba,
Wireshark, Lin...
2019 Feb 11
0
32 seconds vs 72 minutes -- expected performance difference?
Saurabh Nanda via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> writes:
> ## QUESTION
>
> I am sharing a 120GB folder with lots of files via Samba on a LAN (1Gbps
> connection).
>
> 1) Doing an `ls -lR` on the server (on this folder) takes ~32 seconds,
> compared with **72 minutes** on the client....
2019 Feb 21
0
32 seconds vs 72 minutes -- expected performance difference?
Saurabh Nanda <saurabhnanda at gmail.com> writes:
> Help in analysing the tcpdump to get to the bottom of this perf issue would
> be appreciated.
I've looked at the trace but didn't find anything out of the
ordinary. The "STATUS_NO_MORE_FILES" is erroneously taken into account
in t...
2019 Feb 22
0
32 seconds vs 72 minutes -- expected performance difference?
> Am 08.02.2019 um 14:26 schrieb Saurabh Nanda via samba <samba at lists.samba.org>:
>
> ## QUESTION
>
> I am sharing a 120GB folder with lots of files via Samba on a LAN (1Gbps
> connection).
>
> 1) Doing an `ls -lR` on the server (on this folder) takes ~32 seconds,
> compared with **72 minutes** on the client....
2015 May 12
0
Checking for file /7.html
7.html is a ShoutCast metadata file did you have a previous ShoutCast
installation or setup a relay between IceCast and ShoutCast stream?
On May 12, 2015 1:11 AM, "Nanda Kishor Dasa" <nkd at 24hourkirtan.fm> wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> My error log is full of these 2 lines
>
> [2015-05-12 08:08:07] INFO fserve/fserve_client_create checking for
> file /7.html (/usr/share/icecast2/web/7.html)
> [2015-05-12 08:08:07] WARN fserve/fserve_cl...
2015 May 12
0
Checking for file /7.html
On Tue, 12 May 2015, Nanda Kishor Dasa wrote:
> My error log is full of these 2 lines
>
> [2015-05-12 08:08:07] INFO fserve/fserve_client_create checking for
> file /7.html (/usr/share/icecast2/web/7.html)
> [2015-05-12 08:08:07] WARN fserve/fserve_client_create req for file
> "/usr/share/icecast2/w...
2015 May 14
1
Checking for file /7.html
On 14/05/2015 00:00, Yahav Shasha wrote:
> Its more likely to be some shoutcast player or any kind of script that
> request the file, sources don't usually request the status file. Try
> looking for the refer at the access log (if icecast logs 404 requests
> that is) to determinate the request origin, shouldn't be an hassle.
Makes sense. If the Icecast log would also log the
2004 Oct 13
0
Linux device number extension patch
...1,7 @@
#ifndef _JFS_USER_H
#define _JFS_USER_H
-typedef unsigned short kdev_t;
+typedef unsigned long kdev_t;
#include <ext2fs/kernel-jbd.h>
Best Regards,
Wang Chen
----------------------------------------------------------
Wang Chen
Dept. of Technology and Development
Nanjing Fujitsu Nanda Software Tech. Co., Ltd.(FNST)
No. 16-5, Guangzhou Rd., Nanjing, P.R.China 210008
PHONE : +86+25-86630523-636
FUJITSU INTERNAL: 79955-636
FAX : +86+25-83317685
Mail : wangchen at nanjing-fnst.com
----------------------------------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
A...
2013 Nov 27
1
[PATCH v4] btrfs-progs: Fix a segfault when using btrfs-corrupt-block with "-U"
When using "-U" option with btrfs-corrupt-block, it will cause a
segfault due to a missing break in getopt switch.
Reported-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
btrfs-corrupt-block.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/btrfs-corrupt-block.c b/btrfs-corrupt-block.c
index f0c14a9..a2828d4 100644
2015 May 13
3
Checking for file /7.html
On 12/05/2015 22:15, Geoff Shang wrote:
> As has been mentioned, 7.html is a standard stats file produced by
> Shoutcast (at least v1).
>
> It's possible to write an XSL template that can do the same, which
> could
> be aliased if you have software that needs it. I did this ina
> previous
> life. Unfortunately, I don't have convenient access to the hard drive
2019 Feb 18
2
32 seconds vs 72 minutes -- expected performance difference?
>
> I tried looking at the network capture using `tcpdump -A -X` but wasn't
> able to understand anything. I tried installing wireshark on a throwaway
> cloud instance, but realised that it's a GUI program. Can you please help
> be with the network trace at
> https://www.dropbox.com/s/r8cn0qggrvmrpc3/dump.pcap?dl=0 ? It's capturing
> the network chatter for ~1min
2018 Mar 26
0
talloc configure error for armv8be
...ile or directory
WARNING: temp/run.do_configure:1 exit 1 from
This error is caused by using armv8be toolchain,le(little endian) is ok.
I think there is something wrong with uname sysname.
Does anyone know the reason?
--------------------------------------------------
Zheng Ruoqin
Nanjing Fujitsu Nanda Software Tech. Co., Ltd.(FNST)
ADDR.: No.6 Wenzhu Road, Software Avenue,
Nanjing, 210012, China
MAIL : zhengrq.fnst at cn.fujistu.com
2019 Feb 14
0
32 seconds vs 72 minutes -- expected performance difference?
Saurabh Nanda via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> writes:
> Which implies that the server & client auto-negotiated a protocol version
> greater than SMB2.1, right? However, to be sure, I manually specified vers=
> in fstab, but something strange happened. While `man mount.cifs` claims
> th...
2010 Mar 14
2
Boot GSP node with KVM and VirtIO
I'm trying to boot a virtual GSP node with Linux KVM and VirtIO. While
the install itself detects both the VirtIO harddisk (/dev/vdx) and
VirtIO ethernet nic and completes successfully, I'm not able to boot
the virtual machine from it. After POST I can only see the GSP boot
message and the countdown timer, but when the timer reach 0 it stalls.
When I reassign the _same_ disk as IDE or SCSI