On Wed, 13 May 2015, Geoff Shang wrote:> It's showing up because something, probably your source client, is looking > for it. Icecast2 is receiving a request for this file and is logging it.A thought. Is this stream being sourced in Shoutcast-compatibility mode? If your source can do Icecast2 native streaming, you may want to do this and this may go away, depending on your source client. Geoff.
Its more likely to be some shoutcast player or any kind of script that request the file, sources don't usually request the status file. Try looking for the refer at the access log (if icecast logs 404 requests that is) to determinate the request origin, shouldn't be an hassle. ?????? 13 ???? 2015 23:53,? "Geoff Shang" <geoff at quitelikely.com> ???:> On Wed, 13 May 2015, Geoff Shang wrote: > > > It's showing up because something, probably your source client, is > looking > > for it. Icecast2 is receiving a request for this file and is logging it. > > A thought. Is this stream being sourced in Shoutcast-compatibility mode? > If your source can do Icecast2 native streaming, you may want to do this > and this may go away, depending on your source client. > > Geoff. > > _______________________________________________ > Icecast mailing list > Icecast at xiph.org > http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/icecast >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/icecast/attachments/20150514/634d2a4d/attachment.htm
On 14/05/2015 00:00, Yahav Shasha wrote:> Its more likely to be some shoutcast player or any kind of script that > request the file, sources don't usually request the status file. Try > looking for the refer at the access log (if icecast logs 404 requests > that is) to determinate the request origin, shouldn't be an hassle.Makes sense. If the Icecast log would also log the IP address it would be easier to say if this is our own player or someone elses. Of course I could just ignore it, but it's so prominent in the error log that it is sort of irritating. It might also be that some service we use assume we're using ShoutCast and want to extract "now playing" title and artist information. So maybe it would even make "sense" to provide the 7.html file in the expected format? Cheers, NKd
On 13/05/2015 22:52, Geoff Shang wrote:> A thought. Is this stream being sourced in Shoutcast-compatibility > mode? > If your source can do Icecast2 native streaming, you may want to do > this > and this may go away, depending on your source client.The shoutcast-mount node is commented out in icecast.xml, so I don't think so. Cheers, NKd