search for: nam06

...aretra nunc et > mauris consequat venenatis. > > Reviewers: username0, username1 > > Reviewed By: username0 > > Subscribers: username2, username3, llvm-commits > > Tags: #llvm > > Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/Dxxxxx > <https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Freviews.llvm.org%2FDxxxxx&data=02%7C01%7Candya%40microsoft.com%7Cfa22dca30ad64a56b98508d78f940ec0%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637135738379643383&sdata=Lv4bK2YjVOoLGvjhQ9dIA8o%2FZUzZKajpigs5J13Aaqk%3D&reserved=0> &gt...

...username0, username1 >>> >>> Reviewed By: username0 >>> >>> Subscribers: username2, username3, llvm-commits >>> >>> Tags: #llvm >>> >>> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/Dxxxxx >>> <https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Freviews.llvm.org%2FDxxxxx&data=02%7C01%7Candya%40microsoft.com%7Cfa22dca30ad64a56b98508d78f940ec0%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637135738379643383&sdata=Lv4bK2YjVOoLGvjhQ9dIA8o%2FZUzZKajpigs5J13Aaqk%3D&reserved=0> &gt...

I also find the "Reviewed by" tag useful (as well as the review link), for the same reasons. In fact, I don't even use arcanist to push commits, so I do it all by hand, and only include the "Reviewed by" and "Differential Revision" tags. On Fri, 27 Dec 2019 at 20:55, David Blaikie via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > I don't think

On 10/30/20 4:51 PM, Pawel Winogrodzki wrote: > Hello, > > We are currently trying to apply a patch to our 8.0p1 version of OpenSSH for CVE-2020-14145<https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2020-14145>. The "patch" tag from NIST's web page links to the 8.3p1 vs 8.4p1 comparison<https://github.com/openssh/openssh-portable/compare/V_8_3_P1...V_8_4_P1> on GitHub. Is

...e are two major missing features: Jumping out of a _finally and Hardware exception handling. The document below is my proposed design and implementation to fully support SEH on LLVM. I have completely implemented this design on a branch in repo: https://github.com/tentzen/llvm-project<https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Ftentzen%2Fllvm-project&data=02%7C01%7Ctentzen%40microsoft.com%7Ced638e497aa74798b3f808d7d5e46775%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637213049272295023&sdata=Pd6gK%2B7JsIlfcyJLB%2FajWKdrbgqsITsseBfeB2Z5lgg%3D&rese...

...n may throw, but I believe it would be semantics preserving to merge the two identical if-then blocks. The call.setup proposal I sent not long ago runs into the same issue. I have written a patch to tail merge such similar blocks, but I have not landed it: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29428<https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Freviews.llvm.org%2FD29428&data=02%7C01%7Ctentzen%40microsoft.com%7Cac3ebdd6804a46bedefd08d7d852ac14%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637215721902320037&sdata=gnc5zhiNpq1Cv2Of0VSl7nwcS8F6uPBprFT4ffQgDx0%3D&reserved=0> Eve...

Hello folks, I've recently been looking at the generated code for a few functions in Chromium while investigating crashes, and I came across a curious pattern. A smallish repro case is available at https://godbolt.org/z/Dsu1WI . In that case, the function Assembler::emit_arith receives a struct (Operand) by value and passes it by value to another function. That struct is 8 bytes long, so the

...g accesses to local variables, seems terrible for both optimization and correctness. Our handling of setjmp is already a complete mess; I don't want to add another way for unmodeled control flow to break code. (See also http://nondot.org/sabre/LLVMNotes/ExceptionHandlingChanges.txt<https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fnondot.org%2Fsabre%2FLLVMNotes%2FExceptionHandlingChanges.txt&data=02%7C01%7Ctentzen%40microsoft.com%7C74401eb45f3f4482e7ee08d7d67a0cb6%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637213692003044004&sdata=KfCWpmd6xCSNfsfp24DHefEWO9%2FFOnEl...

...e that there’s some documented answer to this question, and other questions like it.) Constructing a testcase for the register allocation issues I mentioned before is hard because it’s sort of “random” based on the register allocation heuristics, but see https://reviews.llvm.org/D77767<https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Freviews.llvm.org%2FD77767&data=02%7C01%7Ctentzen%40microsoft.com%7C334ed759562941d3f2ba08d7e194d0d6%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637225901600853320&sdata=hTvtxO9OVy3fwzqX2EfLRb76Qb%2ByDlmdTHHLvuIrupQ%3D&reserved=0> f...

...e that there’s some documented answer to this question, and other questions like it.) Constructing a testcase for the register allocation issues I mentioned before is hard because it’s sort of “random” based on the register allocation heuristics, but see https://reviews.llvm.org/D77767<https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Freviews.llvm.org%2FD77767&data=02%7C01%7Ctentzen%40microsoft.com%7C33176bc44b81431207c808d7e1e5e5d8%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637226249850794040&sdata=M%2B8lCeJRufD5FuQvUqAkn1GwKBNBvm2DV9YDlockYBc%3D&reserved=0> f...

...n may throw, but I believe it would be semantics preserving to merge the two identical if-then blocks. The call.setup proposal I sent not long ago runs into the same issue. I have written a patch to tail merge such similar blocks, but I have not landed it: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29428<https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Freviews.llvm.org%2FD29428&data=02%7C01%7Ctentzen%40microsoft.com%7Cac3ebdd6804a46bedefd08d7d852ac14%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637215721902320037&sdata=gnc5zhiNpq1Cv2Of0VSl7nwcS8F6uPBprFT4ffQgDx0%3D&reserved=0> Eve...

...e are two major missing features: Jumping out of a _finally and Hardware exception handling. The document below is my proposed design and implementation to fully support SEH on LLVM. I have completely implemented this design on a branch in repo: https://github.com/tentzen/llvm-project<https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Ftentzen%2Fllvm-project&data=02%7C01%7Ctentzen%40microsoft.com%7Ced638e497aa74798b3f808d7d5e46775%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637213049272295023&sdata=Pd6gK%2B7JsIlfcyJLB%2FajWKdrbgqsITsseBfeB2Z5lgg%3D&rese...

...g accesses to local variables, seems terrible for both optimization and correctness. Our handling of setjmp is already a complete mess; I don't want to add another way for unmodeled control flow to break code. (See also http://nondot.org/sabre/LLVMNotes/ExceptionHandlingChanges.txt<https://nam06.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fnondot.org%2Fsabre%2FLLVMNotes%2FExceptionHandlingChanges.txt&data=02%7C01%7Ctentzen%40microsoft.com%7C236f7648ead248c3a15b08d7d69e7980%7C72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7C1%7C0%7C637213848450415103&sdata=XQAyvsAhp%2BnRAwq%2F2wYz9S9prC8fs0...

Hello everyone, I've just uploaded a patch (https://reviews.llvm.org/D70261) to introduce a could of new token types to be used with constrained floating point intrinsics and, optionally, vector predicated intrinsics. These intrinsics may not be of interest to many of you, but I have a more general question. I would like some general feedback on the way I am proposing to use token arguments