search for: nam01

...patch. Any way you can use use a different name? Cheers, Jean-Marc On 04/02/2019 01:39 AM, Marcus Asteborg wrote: > Hi, > > > Here is a proposal for adding CMake in addition of Autotools. > > > See the attached patch for changes or the pull request here: > https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fxiph%2Fopus%2Fpull%2F100&data=02%7C01%7C%7C47f897fd8d6e42c8336c08d6b739d457%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636897856328827874&sdata=ulSL9eGKj8cVt6VPufmkod061Ii56r%2FAsFXvOjyWu44%3D&reserved=0 >...

..., > >         Jean-Marc > > On 04/02/2019 01:39 AM, Marcus Asteborg wrote: >> Hi, >> >> >> Here is a proposal for adding CMake in addition of Autotools. >> >> >> See the attached patch for changes or the pull request here: >> https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fxiph%2Fopus%2Fpull%2F100&data=02%7C01%7C%7C47f897fd8d6e42c8336c08d6b739d457%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636897856328827874&sdata=ulSL9eGKj8cVt6VPufmkod061Ii56r%2FAsFXvOjyWu44%3D&reserved=0 >...

...m host to device) you posted about a week ago, but it's not there anymore. Did you remove it?. Thanks. Hamilton. On 21/03/20 10:04 p. m., Hamilton Tobon Mosquera via llvm-dev wrote: > Hi there!, > > Right now I'm starting with the project proposed by Johannes here: > https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fllvm%2Fllvm-project%2Fissues%2F180&data=01%7C01%7Chtobonm%40eafit.edu.co%7C2623ce41dabf4613303e08d7ce0570e7%7C99f7b55e9cbe467b8143919782918afb%7C0&sdata=oOXfSmxJZCwH5BhydZMwaoO5cXe10NKladeSYh%2F8z%2FA%3D&reserv...

..., As part of my application process to the next GSoC I'm working on the TODO in OpenMPOpt.cpp line 437: // TODO: We should validate the declaration agains the types we expect. Link: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/master/llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/OpenMPOpt.cpp#L437<https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fllvm%2Fllvm-project%2Fblob%2Fmaster%2Fllvm%2Flib%2FTransforms%2FIPO%2FOpenMPOpt.cpp%23L437&data=01%7C01%7Chtobonm%40eafit.edu.co%7C60068814c014449f011808d7c5bafa38%7C99f7b55e9cbe467b8143919782918afb%7C0&sdata=LN1PaCRL7EasnWgZY...

...but it's not > there anymore. Did you remove it?. > > Thanks. > > Hamilton. > > On 21/03/20 10:04 p. m., Hamilton Tobon Mosquera via llvm-dev wrote: >> Hi there!, >> >> Right now I'm starting with the project proposed by Johannes here: >> https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fllvm%2Fllvm-project%2Fissues%2F180&amp;data=01%7C01%7Chtobonm%40eafit.edu.co%7Cec2747b9c96d4b8ddc0f08d7ce862a84%7C99f7b55e9cbe467b8143919782918afb%7C0&amp;sdata=zTnmQJZUEiXL4B2AL07ABtV8pLfiRNKWm%2BrCgskxgb0%3D&amp;reserved...

Hi, Here is a proposal for adding CMake in addition of Autotools. See the attached patch for changes or the pull request here: https://github.com/xiph/opus/pull/100 The CMake scripts are parsing the filelist from Autotools, so only one file list needs to be maintained. With this change the checked in Visual Studio solution can be removed and no longer need to be maintained and updated when

...t; >> Hamilton. > >> > >> On 21/03/20 10:04 p. m., Hamilton Tobon Mosquera via llvm-dev wrote: > >>> Hi there!, > >>> > >>> Right now I'm starting with the project proposed by Johannes here: > >>> > https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fllvm%2Fllvm-project%2Fissues%2F180&amp;data=01%7C01%7Chtobonm%40eafit.edu.co%7C27650f5cf4e24c5920be08d7cf3c8209%7C99f7b55e9cbe467b8143919782918afb%7C0&amp;sdata=QU6c8JHe33fkyAhEKhj3%2BBQk3AiAf7BhbXhB7ny2%2Fxk%3D&amp;reserv...

...to the main offloading > > function. > > Any suggestion or documentation on how that memory transfer is > > achieved?, and how to track its API calls. It might be that I'm not > > using the proper omp directive, so here is C code: > > Take a look at https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgodbolt.org%2Fz%2FE9VoVx&amp;data=01%7C01%7Chtobonm%40eafit.edu.co%7C1c12e490f3804f6a772d08d7cf570a3a%7C99f7b55e9cbe467b8143919782918afb%7C0&amp;sdata=XIo6OoK0Xnhat9bZbTNz9Rq9hYvBQhknTxULoA8Ma%2Fk%3D&amp;reserved=0 , the mapping reques...

...   > Any suggestion or documentation on how that memory transfer is > >>   > achieved?, and how to track its API calls. It might be that I'm not > >>   > using the proper omp directive, so here is C code: > >> > >> Take a look at > https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgodbolt.org%2Fz%2FE9VoVx&amp;data=01%7C01%7Chtobonm%40eafit.edu.co%7Cd2a1829610714bf161b508d7d0d2f5ae%7C99f7b55e9cbe467b8143919782918afb%7C0&amp;sdata=nhtF7ZKL3iPAQEJpIgCFb0cpcPGQYRvOHuPmkxyI6H8%3D&amp;reserved=0 > , the mapping req...

...er is > >>   >>   > achieved?, and how to track its API calls. It might be that > I'm not > >>   >>   > using the proper omp directive, so here is C code: > >>   >> > >>   >> Take a look at > >> > https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgodbolt.org%2Fz%2FE9VoVx&amp;data=01%7C01%7Chtobonm%40eafit.edu.co%7C3e9ac7a8643c4dbe405e08d7d38dfd75%7C99f7b55e9cbe467b8143919782918afb%7C0&amp;sdata=yM9OaHxEHZBkU9HNFiMvQFv9zveVQp3kS%2FB4W9qkxKA%3D&amp;reserved=0 > >> , th...

...lems > they are trying to tackle. Also, I'm close to solve one of the bugs > posted in bugzilla, which has given me a broader idea of how the > OpenMP > pragmas are translated. The bus is this: > https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40253 > <https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbugs.llvm.org%2Fshow_bug.cgi%3Fid%3D40253&data=01%7C01%7Chtobonm%40eafit.edu.co%7Cf44f8c5edf16433b2a1108d7c54880a5%7C99f7b55e9cbe467b8143919782918afb%7C0&sdata=Qn9zhvwzJjx%2B12uCCQUcyKBDlhuHXwMTEOvvE1MYNAA%3D&reserved=0>. > >...

...day, September 14, 2020 5:00:03 AM To: centos-virt at centos.org <centos-virt at centos.org> Subject: CentOS-virt Digest, Vol 156, Issue 3 Send CentOS-virt mailing list submissions to centos-virt at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.centos.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fcentos-virt&amp;data=02%7C01%7C%7C1b1ff21daaae47317c1d08d858a5b905%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637356816074942137&amp;sdata=GhJFGCT2YcbsOcSHWcDOuAlirayGxiVvuD2L2XspkVk%3D&amp;res...

Tengo un vector de fechas en formato R: > fechas <- c(?2016-07-15?, ?2016-10-12?, ?2017-02-11?) quiero que las fechas de 2017 (la tercera del vector del ejemplo) pasen a ser NA > fechas2 <- ifelse(fechas > ?2016-12-31?, NA, fechas) El problema que me encuentro es que el resultado (fechas2) es un vector numérico y no un vector de fechas. No encuentro la solución. Se agradecen

...tting back garbage. Do I misunderstand the read_register call here? Thanks, Jordan _______________________________________________ LLVM Developers mailing list llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev<https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flists.llvm.org%2Fcgi-bin%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fllvm-dev&data=02%7C01%7C%7C75fc1886795644fde63508d6458ea8d1%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C636772876347540128&sdata=rqOd0XZEm7VTKcxviSbjybgpSKgDL3lCU%2Fzq32fi4O0%3D&reserved=...

Hi, I have just installed Ubuntu 19.04 (Disco Dingo) and after adding the following repo: deb https://cloud.r-project.org/bin/linux/ubuntu disco-cran35/ and importing the keys, I want to install r-base so I perform the following: sudo apt update sudo apt install r-base Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Some packages could not be

Greetings, I'm an LLVM newcomer interested in participating in the next GSoC under the project "Improve parallelism-aware analyses and optimizations". I've already read "Compiler Optimizations for OpenMP" and "Compiler Optimizations for Parallel Programs" both by Doerfert and Finkel. Also, I've watched their two LLVM meeting developers conferences

On 5/2/19 1:01 PM, Willem Ligtenberg wrote: > Hi, > > I have just installed Ubuntu 19.04 (Disco Dingo) and after adding the following repo: > deb https://nam01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcloud.r-project.org%2Fbin%2Flinux%2Fubuntu&amp;data=02%7C01%7Cmar36%40psu.edu%7C03d535fa26ac4440ec4808d6cf1fd474%7C7cf48d453ddb4389a9c1c115526eb52e%7C0%7C1%7C636924132963196474&amp;sdata=mee1w7WLapUreQpzccSPMFWm%2Bd06r1VJRlFeiWbkO2g%3D&amp...

Hi all, With some downtime it's time for some CMake fixes. Most critically is the SSE fixes to avoid crashes that is described in 154 and 132 in github. Patch 5 should address this and also adding APPROX-FLOAT option. Hopefully this can give some gains for those of us running on Windows servers.j I went through the pull request and picked out a few that will ease up integration for

Hello, I am building the SPEC 2006 Benchmark with Clang as the compiler. I have written a function pass in LLVM and I am trying to run that for SPEC by invoking the pass in the build options of SPEC. The build options of SPEC are in a *.cfg config file, which allows us to specify the choice of compiler while building SPEC. (https://www.spec.org/cpu2006/Docs/install-guide-unix.html) The pass

Hi, I'm trying to use the statepoint-example strategy to build a simple garbage collector. After using the PlaceSafepoints and RewriteStatepointsForGC passes, I can successfully generate a stack map in my binary and call into my runtime's gc poll. As far as I can tell, I need the stack pointer at the point of the poll to find the correct frame in the stack map. I'm having trouble