search for: nahmen

? ? ? Sehr geehrter Kunde ? ? Ab 16.04.2023 Sie m?ssen das neue Websicherheitssystem aktivieren. Der gesamte Vorgang dauert nur 1 Minuten. ? Sie m?ssen jetzt Ma?nahmen ergreifen, um das Problem so schnell wie m?glich zu beheben ? ? Aktivierung von Postbank BestSign ? ? ?2023 Postbank ? ? Alle Rechte vorbehalten ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?...

...ieser Mail ist nicht gestattet. Jede von der Binect GmbH versendete Mail ist sorgf?ltig erstellt worden, dennoch schlie?en wir die rechtliche Verbindlichkeit aus; sie kann nicht zu einer irgendwie gearteten Verpflichtung zu Lasten der Binect GmbH ausgelegt werden. Wir haben alle verkehrs?blichen Ma?nahmen unternommen, um das Risiko der Verbreitung virenbefallener Software oder E-Mails zu minimieren, dennoch raten wir Ihnen, Ihre eigenen Virenkontrollen auf alle Anh?nge an dieser Nachricht durchzuf?hren. Wir schlie?en, au?er f?r den Fall von Vorsatz oder grober Fahrl?ssigkeit, die Haftung f?r jeglich...

...ieser Mail ist nicht gestattet. Jede von der Binect GmbH versendete Mail ist sorgf?ltig erstellt worden, dennoch schlie?en wir die rechtliche Verbindlichkeit aus; sie kann nicht zu einer irgendwie gearteten Verpflichtung zu Lasten der Binect GmbH ausgelegt werden. Wir haben alle verkehrs?blichen Ma?nahmen unternommen, um das Risiko der Verbreitung virenbefallener Software oder E-Mails zu minimieren, dennoch raten wir Ihnen, Ihre eigenen Virenkontrollen auf alle Anh?nge an dieser Nachricht durchzuf?hren. Wir schlie?en, au?er f?r den Fall von Vorsatz oder grober Fahrl?ssigkeit, die Haftung f?r jeglich...

Hi Jochen, On Wed, 12 Feb 2020 at 00:16, Jochen Bern <Jochen.Bern at binect.de> wrote: > > On 02/11/2020 07:07 PM, Cl?ment P?ron wrote: > > - I have X devices (around 30) and one SSH server > > - Each of them have a unique public key and create one dynamic reverse > > port forwarding on the server > > - All of them connect with the same UNIX user (I don't

...= ( const unsigned char *) 0x8111564 "\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<p>Gefahrenquelle vermeiden/beseitigen/reduzieren</p>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<p><u>D </u><b>D</b><br />\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<u> </u></p>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<p>Sicherheitstechnische Ma?nahmen</p>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<p><u>B </u><b>B</b><br />\n\t\t\t\t\t"... i = 6 size = 30 startpos = 29 colon_pos = 0 parse_size = 29 value_pos = <value optimized out> ret = 6 continued = true...

Dear all, Right out of the blue glusterfs is not working fine any more every now end the it stops working telling me, Endpoint not connected and writing core files: [root at tuepdc /]# file core.15288 core.15288: ELF 64-bit LSB core file AMD x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), SVR4-style, from 'glusterfs' My Version: [root at tuepdc /]# glusterfs --version glusterfs 3.2.0 built on Apr 22 2011

Hello everyone, I work in a setting where remote logins are usually authenticated with SSH user keypairs, but many target accounts need to have a password set nonetheless (to use with sudo, log in via remote KVM, etc.) and cannot be put under a central user administration like LDAP. Enter a corporate password policy that requires passwords to be complex, different everywhere, and of limited

Hi, On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 03:16:00PM +0000, Jochen Bern wrote: > Out of interest: > 1. If an extended mechanism were to be implemented, which server pubkey > do you expect to be seen/stored/verified by the client? The proxy's > / v4 middlebox's, or the v6 backend's? Or would you require that all > server-side machines use the *same* host keypairs? I'd do

Hi everyone, I'm running dovecot with quite a lot of users and lots of active imap connections (like 20'000). I'm using different user IDs for users, so I need to have imap {service_count=1} - i.e. I have a lots of imap processes running. Everything works fine, until I reload dovecot configuration. When that happen, every client is forced to relogin in the same time and that

Hello, given a small organization. There are *personal* mailboxes (mailbox per user, incl. subfolders et cetera). The users can share specic folders via the ACL (we call it "other users/", Dovecot calls it "shared" folder. Additionally there are mailboxes Dovecot calls "public" (we use the term "groups/"). They are not associated with a specific account,

If I read this correctly, starttls will fail due to the MITM attack. That is the client knows security has been compromised. Using SSL/TLS, the MITM can use SSL stripping. Since most Postifx conf use "may" for security, the message would go though unencrypted. Correct??? Is there something to enable for perfect forward security with starttls? ? Original Message ? From: s.arcus at

Hi all, When I use an email client, its purpose is as a window into my Dovecot IMAP, and as a mechanism to reply to and send emails. I don't do filtering or calendaring on my email client (filtering via procmail direct to Dovecot). What email clients are all of you using to look at your IMAP email? Thanks, SteveT Steve Litt November 2016 featured book: Quit Joblessness: Start Your Own

Hello. I am trying to play through the following test scenario about certificate revocation on Ubuntu 18.04, which has OpenSSH of this version: OpenSSH_7.6p1 Ubuntu-4, OpenSSL 1.0.2n? 7 Dec 2017 1. A CA key is created ssh-keygen -t ed25519 -f ca 2. The CA public key is added to ~/.ssh/authorized_keys on some server: cert-authority ssh-ed25519 AAAA...e ca at yoga 3. A user key is created on a