search for: nahhh

...nd users, but Knows How It Needs To Be. I'm sure it's *far* too much work for, say, the fedora development team to put out once a quarter a notice to upstream, and maybe CentOS, Scientific Linux, and whatever other main user groups to inform them of major changes, and see the feedback.... Nahhh, who cares whether end users are happy, they'll just do what is K3wl, never mind if it's appropriate, or overly complicated.... mark

I have an intermittent problem with my Dell blades, out of 80 blades 69 of them kickstarted Centos 6 fine using PXE The other 11, I get a c0t0 not found error (indicating it is not finding the local disk on the blade). I can remote mount the iso image and do a basic install of centos on these blades, but when I go to do a pxe boot it gives me that error again. I have googled the issue and

On 12/09/2015 08:54 AM, James B. Byrne wrote: > So, the implication of your suggestion, if I understand it aright, is > that I should audit all of the communication forums in use by Fedora > developers and then point out whenever any of the many dozens or > hundreds of contributors introduces something that in my opinion may > impact a server installation. .... > > Am I

Got a bunch of servers from Penguin. Supermicro m/b's H8QG6. We put a 3tb drive in for additional workspace for the users, and some of them won't read, others will go for weeks, then spit out DRDY errors. lshw shows the controller as an ATI SB7x0/SB8x0/SB9x0 SATA. I did notice that it shows *-storage description: SATA controller product: SB7x0/SB8x0/SB9x0 SATA