search for: myopic

On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 9:54 AM, Valeri Galtsev <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote: >> Now I use Google. They offer MFA opt in. And now I'm more secure than >> I was with the myopic ISP. > > "More secure" only to the level one can trust google ;-) Yes I know, but I put them in approximately the same ballpark as having to trust my proprietary CPU, and proprietary logic board's proprietary firmware. -- Chris Murphy

...My intent was to suggest using an established tool that would consolidate the IP blocking and unblocking function for all ports into a single application without imposing additional maintenance overhead of new code for this purpose. Obviously, I'm not seeing the big picture. Sorry for my myopic comments and for cluttering the list. I won't make the mistake of offering worthless contributions in the future. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20110405/0085bb33/attachment.htm&...

...ttack success is exceeding that of human ability (and interest) to remember ever longer more complex passwords. I just fired my ISP because of the asininity of setting a 180 compulsory expiration on passwords. Now I use Google. They offer MFA opt in. And now I'm more secure than I was with the myopic ISP. Apple and Microsoft (and likely others) have been working to deprecate login passwords for years - obviously they're not ready to flip the switch over yet, it isn't an easy problem to solve, but part of why they haven't had more urgency is because they are doing a lot of work on p...

On Thu, July 30, 2015 12:54, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 9:54 AM, Valeri Galtsev > <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote: > >>> Now I use Google. They offer MFA opt in. And now I'm more secure >>> than I was with the myopic ISP. >> >> "More secure" only to the level one can trust google ;-) > > Yes I know, but I put them in approximately the same ballpark as > having to trust my proprietary CPU, and proprietary logic board's > proprietary firmware. So your motherboards and nics c...

...at of human > ability (and interest) to remember ever longer more complex passwords. > I just fired my ISP because of the asininity of setting a 180 > compulsory expiration on passwords. > > Now I use Google. They offer MFA opt in. And now I'm more secure than > I was with the myopic ISP. "More secure" only to the level one can trust google ;-) Just my $0.02 Valeri > > Apple and Microsoft (and likely others) have been working to deprecate > login passwords for years - obviously they're not ready to flip the > switch over yet, it isn't an easy p...

On Thu, July 30, 2015 11:54 am, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 9:54 AM, Valeri Galtsev > <galtsev at kicp.uchicago.edu> wrote: > >>> Now I use Google. They offer MFA opt in. And now I'm more secure than >>> I was with the myopic ISP. >> >> "More secure" only to the level one can trust google ;-) > > Yes I know, but I put them in approximately the same ballpark as > having to trust my proprietary CPU, and proprietary logic board's > proprietary firmware. > There is difference IMHO....

...t (for chapter level > chunking in books), this has been fixed in the trunk: > > > http://code.google.com/p/asciidoc/source/detail?r=fe13fddfacafe60cc07674aff77a12850dfbde6b > excellent, thanks a lot! The real problem is the inability to specify section level TOCS. Due to some > myopic thinking on my part, the TOC control is effectively hardwired in > ./docbook-xsl/common.xsl. I've fixed this so that the TOCs can now be > controlled via the various DocBook XSL Stylesheets TOC parameters (see > http://www.sagehill.net/docbookxsl/TOCcontrol.html) > generate.section....

...n't count. i love mothers, since they _are_ in my target audience. by far the most interesting category these days is ios, especially when coupled with a cloud-based solution. iawriter is getting a lot of attention. i'm not sure why, since its overall write-one-line-at-a-time premise is myopic to the point of stupid, but that's hype for you. also, iawriter uses a "reduced" form of markdown, one which only supports headlines, lists, and blockquotes, so the label has been marketed down to almost zilch. i'm using an app called "nocs", which i find adequate. nocs...

On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 6:32 PM, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote: > On Jul 28, 2015, at 4:37 PM, Nathan Duehr <denverpilot at me.com> wrote: >> Equating this to ?vaccination? is a huge stretch. > > Why? It's not just an imperfect analogy it really doesn't work on closer scrutiny. Malware itself is not a good analog to antigens. Vaccinations provide

Hi folks I have more than 12 years experience with UNIX system administration, but I am too stupid for programming. My only programming experience is shell scripting. I tried to learn Java, but don't understand it because it is too complicated for my limited brainpower. What programming language should I learn? A friend said that C-Sharp (Mono) is very simple. Is this true? cheers Sven

...l and objective issues > which are widely recognised. I suspect that for many people, those are rationalizations rather than reasons. I saw much the same sort of logic in the Unix vs Linux wars, roughly spanning the decade surrounding 1996. The Big Iron Unix and SCO Unix fans had all kinds of myopically rational reasons why Linux wasn?t going to replace their OS of choice: journaled filesystems, better SMP, STREAMS, hot-swap hardware, real ksh93 instead of that cheesy nonstandard imitation Bash? The analogy I used at the time is that the Unix fans saw Linux surfing behind their big yacht and...

...ich are widely recognised. > > I suspect that for many people, those are rationalizations rather than reasons. > > I saw much the same sort of logic in the Unix vs Linux wars, roughly spanning the decade surrounding 1996. > > The Big Iron Unix and SCO Unix fans had all kinds of myopically rational reasons why Linux wasn?t going to replace their OS of choice: journaled filesystems, better SMP, STREAMS, hot-swap hardware, real ksh93 instead of that cheesy nonstandard imitation Bash? > > The analogy I used at the time is that the Unix fans saw Linux surfing behind their big...

Hi -- I have been reading documentation and googling around to find the correct way to do this but I have found many ways that seem to not work, or the documentation makes no reference to. I am using mongrel cluster with 10 mongrels for each server. Recently I installed monit but which lead me to find the correct way to start/stop mongrel instances one pid at a time. I am assuming one pid at a

On Oct 17, 2018, at 10:03 AM, Mark Rousell <mark.rousell at signal100.com> wrote: > > launchd is not being forced on them as systemd is in practice Try doing without launchd on macOS. If you think that?s irrelevant, count the number of MacBooks at the next FreeBSD conference you attend. For an init system to gain sufficient momentum, it must be the default, with no easy way to