Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "mutexlocker".
Did you mean:
mutexlock
2005 Aug 27
2
[LLVMdev] MutexGuard and MutexLocker
It seems that these two classes are the same... Maybe they should be
merged into 1 class?
--
Alkis
2005 Aug 27
0
[LLVMdev] MutexGuard and MutexLocker
Alkis Evlogimenos wrote:
> It seems that these two classes are the same... Maybe they should be
> merged into 1 class?
>
I think you're looking at something old. MutexLocker doesn't exist any more.
Reid.
2005 Aug 28
1
[LLVMdev] MutexGuard and MutexLocker
On Sat, 2005-08-27 at 11:47 -0700, Reid Spencer wrote:
> Alkis Evlogimenos wrote:
> > It seems that these two classes are the same... Maybe they should be
> > merged into 1 class?
> >
> I think you're looking at something old. MutexLocker doesn't exist any more.
llvm/Support/ThreadSupport.h is not generated anymore?
--
Alkis
2015 Sep 08
2
[ThreadSanitizer] Get deadlocks working
+thread-sanitizer mailing list
On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 6:41 PM, Vaivaswatha Nagaraj <vn at compilertree.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am interested in understand the compiler-rt thread sanitizer tool and have
> recently started experimenting with it. In particular, I'm interested in the
> deadlock detector.
>
> I see that deadlock detection currently don't work. (I
2003 Jan 11
3
Multithreading
Hi.
I need to execute a function from within a GUI.
This seems to be no problem but this function takes about 4 minutes to
finish, which means the application doesn't react at all, while the
function is running.
Can I execute a function as a separate Thread, while keeping
control(e.g. a reference) of it at the same time?
If not, how do this with a class containing this function?
thanks,