search for: mutexlock

It seems that these two classes are the same... Maybe they should be merged into 1 class? -- Alkis

Alkis Evlogimenos wrote: > It seems that these two classes are the same... Maybe they should be > merged into 1 class? > I think you're looking at something old. MutexLocker doesn't exist any more. Reid.

On Sat, 2005-08-27 at 11:47 -0700, Reid Spencer wrote: > Alkis Evlogimenos wrote: > > It seems that these two classes are the same... Maybe they should be > > merged into 1 class? > > > I think you're looking at something old. MutexLocker doesn't exist any more. llvm/Support/ThreadSupport.h is not generated anymore? -- Alkis

...ee that deadlock detection currently don't work. (I tried with a few > simple deadlocks, as well as the test case "must_deadlock.cc" that is in the > test-suite). I understand from the comments that this is because the real > pthread_mutex_lock() is called before the handler (MutexLock()) in tsan. > > 1. Is there any particular reason that this interceptor is designed this > way? Can there be a callback prior to calling the real pthread_mutex_lock() > that can, for example, detect deadlocks? > 2. Upon debugging a simple test case, I see that there is a worker threa...

Hi. I need to execute a function from within a GUI. This seems to be no problem but this function takes about 4 minutes to finish, which means the application doesn't react at all, while the function is running. Can I execute a function as a separate Thread, while keeping control(e.g. a reference) of it at the same time? If not, how do this with a class containing this function? thanks,