search for: musch

...ditions. If I run them in a batch, say 100 initial conditions, the whole procedure tends to run slower with each new additional condition. I must tell you that not much of information is stored, just pooled results over 1000 cycles and final calcualtions for each initial set. I avoided FOR loops as musch as I could... I have just two: one for the cycles and one for the initial conditions, everything else is vectorized. What could I do to improve the procedure? I am thinking to additionaly vectorize the last for loop (the initial conditions)... would it make a difference? (1) >for (i in 1:100)...

...not completly satisfied on 2 points. 1. Often, when I creat a windows file and print server; I creat it in domain controler. Now I havn't find a possibility to export domain group into local group in each client. Acctualy i must put each domain user into the apporpriate local group. It make so musch time (principaly for a big compagny) and it's not very professional ;-)) 2. When I configure my server in print server it function nicely. But like exportation group, I'm not completly satisfied. When a client send a print it possible to look the print icon in the task bar but when you cli...

I remember seeing a post about a japanese link to a new portable with OGG support. I stumbled across this today and thought I'd throw it out there incase you guys hadn't seen it. http://www.iriveramerica.com/products/iHP-120.asp Looks pretty sweet to me. --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this

> I had the idea of implementing a lot of the operations in FFTs. ( for > example, it is possible to do auto-correlation and FIR filtering using > FFTs.) There are two advantages to this. > 1. It's almost always faster > 2. By swapping fft implementations, it could be easy to recompile for > fixed or floating point versions. No. FFT's require higher precision than

....7.4.8 Content-Length: 0 I see neither DND not CONNECTED an any of this. Either these phone logs are incomplete or what is passed over the wire differs from what is displayed in the Asterisk trace. I lack the knowledge to determine which is the case. In Asterisk -rvvvvvvvvvvv I see this (among musch else): == Extension Changed 41712[ext-local] new state InUse for Notify User 41720 -- Executing [*78 at from-internal-original:2] Wait("SIP/41712-000009e4", "1") in new stack -- Executing [*78 at from-internal-original:3] Macro("SIP/41712-000009e4", "us...

I've seen this problem mentioned many times in the various FAQs and How-Tos on the Internet, but none of the solutions presented therein have worked for me. [global] workgroup = UNIX server string = OPTIMUS interfaces = eth0 log level = 1 log file = /var/log/samba/%m.log max log size = 0 # socket options = TCP_NODELAY

Hello All, Ive been doing more and more research on trying to setup a cluster/load balancer for Asterisk. All the Asterisk boxes would be using a config that is the same between them all (via a DB), but we want one location to point the phones to, and from there that machine/device will send it to a Asterisk server so the call can be processed. I know you cant balance the whole call, ie: once the