search for: murry

Dear Anoop, thank you very much for your detailed explanation. > I think you are hitting a bug[1] from vfs module for GlusterFS inside Samba during a realpath() > call. > > This regression got in when glfs_realpath() was modified in GlusterFS[2] to correctly handle memory > allocation and corresponding freeing of string arguments. And this particular change is present from >

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 13 Feb 2014, Murray Trainer wrote: > Haven't setup mail delivery yet but the lda will need some sort of > setuid access to write mail to the user folders. That's one reason I switched to LMTP at last. - -- Steffen Kaiser -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

Sorry to bother those of you who are faced with issues probably not as trivial my concern, but I am hitting a brick wall. I am upgrading from Samba 2.2.5 to 3.0.14a on a Solaris 8 box. I have configured, run make, makepkg and installed using pkgadd. I am using the same smbpasswd file and smb.conf file I used with 2.2.5. However, these files are now in the /etc/samba directory rather than the

On Tue, 2017-12-05 at 11:11 +0000, Riccardo Murri wrote: > Hello, > > I'm trying to set up a SAMBA server serving a GlusterFS volume. > Everything works fine if I locally mount the GlusterFS volume (`mount > -t glusterfs ...`) and then serve the mounted FS through SAMBA, but > the performance is slower by a 2x/3x compared to a SAMBA server with a > local ext4 filesystem.

Keep in mind a local disk is 3,6,12 Gbps but a network connection is typically 1Gbps. A local disk quad in raid 10 will outperform a 10G ethernet (especially using SAS drives). On December 5, 2017 6:11:38 AM EST, Riccardo Murri <riccardo.murri at uzh.ch> wrote: >Hello, > >I'm trying to set up a SAMBA server serving a GlusterFS volume. >Everything works fine if I locally

Hello, I'm trying to set up a SAMBA server serving a GlusterFS volume. Everything works fine if I locally mount the GlusterFS volume (`mount -t glusterfs ...`) and then serve the mounted FS through SAMBA, but the performance is slower by a 2x/3x compared to a SAMBA server with a local ext4 filesystem. I gather that SAMBA vfs_glusterfs module can give better performance. However, as soon as I