search for: multilibs

On Aug 25, 2009, at 2:33 PM, Mike Stump wrote: > On Aug 23, 2009, at 11:36 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: >> Current llvm-gcc-4.2 for trunk and the 2.6 release >> is unable to build the i386 multilib for the >> x86_64-apple-darwin target. The attached patch provides >> this support. Can we get this into the 2.6 release >> and trunk? > > This is fine. I don't

On Aug 25, 2009, at 9:57 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > > On Aug 25, 2009, at 2:33 PM, Mike Stump wrote: > >> On Aug 23, 2009, at 11:36 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: >>> Current llvm-gcc-4.2 for trunk and the 2.6 release >>> is unable to build the i386 multilib for the >>> x86_64-apple-darwin target. The attached patch provides >>> this support. Can we get

Any chance that we could get r80071 applied to llvm-gcc-2.4 2.6 branch in about a week? As Mike said this change should be very safe. Jack On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 12:48:15AM -0700, Eric Christopher wrote: > > On Aug 25, 2009, at 9:57 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > > > > > On Aug 25, 2009, at 2:33 PM, Mike Stump wrote: > > > >> On Aug 23, 2009, at

Current llvm-gcc-4.2 for trunk and the 2.6 release is unable to build the i386 multilib for the x86_64-apple-darwin target. The attached patch provides this support. Can we get this into the 2.6 release and trunk? Jack -------------- next part -------------- Index: gcc/config/i386/t-darwin64 =================================================================== ---

On Aug 26, 2009, at 2:11 PM, Jack Howarth wrote: > Any chance that we could get r80071 applied to llvm-gcc-2.4 2.6 > branch in about a week? As Mike said this change should be > very safe. Yes, I'll ask Tanya to pull it into the release. -Chris > Jack > > On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 12:48:15AM -0700, Eric Christopher wrote: >> >> On Aug 25, 2009, at

On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 6:39 AM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 8:39 AM, Ferenc Wagner <wferi at niif.hu> wrote: > >> * make spotless still fails after working around the above: >> [...] >> make -r -C efi SRC="/home/wferi/syslinux/syslinux/efi" OBJ="/home/wferi/syslinux/syslinux/efi32/efi" \ >>

Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> writes: > On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 6:39 AM, Gene Cumm <gene.cumm at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 8:39 AM, Ferenc Wagner <wferi at niif.hu> wrote: >> >>> * make spotless still fails after working around the above: >>> [...] >>> make -r -C efi

doesn't --target=x86_64-apple-darwin imply you don't want multi-libs, and an x86_64-only compiler? Shantonu Sent from my MacBook On Aug 23, 2009, at 11:36 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: > Current llvm-gcc-4.2 for trunk and the 2.6 release > is unable to build the i386 multilib for the > x86_64-apple-darwin target. The attached patch provides > this support. Can we get this into

Hi, Unfortunately we are getting multilib issues with the latest release of CentOS 7. It seems that samba-common.i686 conflicts with samba-common.x86_64, and therefore Yum multilib support. Is this expected? Thanks, -ben Transaction check error: file /usr/bin/net conflicts between attempted installs of samba-common-0:4.1.12-21.el7_1.i686 and samba-common-0:4.1.12-21.el7_1.x86_64 file

Chris, Thanks. I am going to update the fink llvm and llvm-gcc42 packages I maintain to the 2.6 release so this will help. Is clang updated in unison with llvm/llvm-gcc-4.2 and is there much new that isn't in Xcode 3.2's clang? I was considering creating clang packaging for fink as well (if the releases were coordinated and the c++ support was decent yet). Jack On Thu,

On Aug 23, 2009, at 11:36 AM, Jack Howarth wrote: > Current llvm-gcc-4.2 for trunk and the 2.6 release > is unable to build the i386 multilib for the > x86_64-apple-darwin target. The attached patch provides > this support. Can we get this into the 2.6 release > and trunk? This is fine. I don't have a rw llvm-gcc tree, some else want to check it in? For 2.6, that's be

I just tried to update to CentOS 6.2, but I am faced with "Errors: Protected multilib versions" error, the offending packages are: jasper-libs.i686 krb5-libs.i686 nss.i686 After some investigation, it turns out that there are newer packages in "x86_64 updates" repository, but only for x86_64 version, while in "x86_64 main" repository there are older i686 version

Hi, Can you file this as a bugreport on bugs.centos.org and we will work it asap. - KB On 04/01/2015 05:51 PM, Benjamin Ash wrote: > Hi, > > Unfortunately we are getting multilib issues with the latest release > of CentOS 7. It seems that samba-common.i686 conflicts with > samba-common.x86_64, and therefore Yum multilib support. > > Is this expected? > > >

On Sat, 2005-03-12 at 20:08 +0800, Mark Quitoriano wrote: > may i ask what''s the centos apt address? > I changed the name of this thread so I can explain where apt is and when it can be used in CentOS. Apt is currently only supported in CentOS-4 and only on the i386 arch. apt, apt-devel and synaptic are "extras" packages for CentOS-4.0 i386. That means they are included

On 19 Sep 2007, at 21:51, Dale Johannesen wrote: >> will disable multilib (./configure --disable-multilib ...) and try >> again and post the results > > Yeah, that should work. Indeed it did. llvm-gcc now builds fine. (llvm and llvm-gcc at Revision: 42148) haven't run the test-suite or test yet - need sleep - good night my configure flags in case anyone wonders:

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Duncan Murdoch" <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> > To: "Dan Tenenbaum" <dtenenba at fredhutch.org> > Cc: r-devel at r-project.org > Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 12:06:48 PM > Subject: Re: [Rd] Notes on building a gcc toolchain for Rtools (but not multilib) > > On 10/03/2015 3:17 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:

On 10/03/2015 2:56 PM, Dan Tenenbaum wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Duncan Murdoch" <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> >> To: "Dan Tenenbaum" <dtenenba at fredhutch.org> >> Cc: "Hsiu-Khuern Tang" <tangoh at gmail.com>, r-devel at r-project.org >> Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2015 11:37:12 AM >>

On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Ady via Syslinux <syslinux at zytor.com> wrote: > _ I doubt Syslinux can be successfully built in a "pure 64-bit" OS, but > I could be wrong. I have always seen some form of "multilib" or > "lib32-glibc" or similar as a dependency. If you succeed in building > Syslinux in a "pure 64-bit" OS, please let us

On Sun, Mar 8, 2015 at 10:02 PM, Hsiu-Khuern Tang <tangoh at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > [This is a follow-up to the "New version of Rtools for Windows" thread > in January, but I just subscribed and don't know how to reply to an > old thread -- my apologies.] > > I was able to use the nuwen distro to build a gcc 4.9.2 toolchain and > use it to build the

On 10/03/2015 12:54 PM, Dan Tenenbaum wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Duncan Murdoch" <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> > > To: "Hsiu-Khuern Tang" <tangoh at gmail.com>, r-devel at r-project.org > > Sent: Monday, March 9, 2015 10:40:02 AM > > Subject: Re: [Rd] Notes on building a gcc toolchain for Rtools (but not