Displaying 20 results from an estimated 188 matches for "muddi".
Did you mean:
mudd
2015 Nov 13
3
llvm TGSI backend (WIP) questions
On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 9:25 AM, Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Hans,
>
> Not to muddy the waters or anything, have you thought about the NIR
> integration that Rob was thinking about ?
> I'm pretty sure he'll be happy to have extra people helping him out.
How would that in any way plug into llvm or nouveau? There's no OpenCL
C ->
2010 Mar 03
2
Notch Filter in AEC
Hi Jean-Marc,
You make that sound like its just a matter of meeting some arbitrary
spec. Let's be more specific.....
If you use narrow band voice down to deep bass frequencies:
- 16 bit linear audio sounds good
- alaw or ulaw sounds muddy
- low bit rate codecs, like speex or G.729, sound awful.
I assume QinBin only listened to some uncompressed audio in his evaluation.
2014 Aug 18
2
[LLVMdev] Plan to optimize atomics in LLVM
Hi Robin,
On 15 August 2014 21:49, Robin Morisset <morisset at google.com> wrote:
> I have
> attached the corresponding patches; they are not completely ready for review
> (mostly missing tests), I would just like to make sure that the general
> approach seems reasonable.
I've had a quick glance at the patches, and the code seems fairly sane.
But I'm not so sure about
2013 Jan 03
2
[LLVMdev] Build Failure
David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> writes:
> Selfhost clang. Whenever we get a warning from Clang we either fix
> Clang or fix the build quite quickly.
Not possible,
> If you want to fix the build such that LLVM can be built -Werror clean
> with GCC the right solution is going to be to turn off -Wuninitialized
> when the LLVM build system detects that it is using GCC
2017 Oct 03
2
TargetMachine vs LLVMTargetMachine
The distinction between the LLVMTargetMachine and TargetMachine classes has become somewhat muddy recently. So I created:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D38482
to clean things up. During review it was noted that we may rather merge the two instead which looks like this:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D38489 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D38489>
We really should choose one of the two over the status quo.
2025 Feb 05
1
Looking for simple line-splitting code
On Wed, 5 Feb 2025 08:44:12 -0500
Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote:
> If I have this object:
>
> x <- c("abc\ndef", "", "ghi")
>
> and I write it to a file using `writeLines(x, "test.txt")`, my text
> editor sees a 5 line file:
>
> 1: abc
> 2: def
> 3:
> 4: ghi
> 5:
>
2007 Feb 27
3
rc23 Problem - Assertion Failed
Feb 27 14:17:46 wurfel dovecot: imap-login: Login: user=<USER>,
method=PLAIN, rip=127.0.0.1, lip=127.0.0.1, secured
Feb 27 14:17:46 wurfel dovecot: IMAP(USER): file mbox-sync-update.c: line
387 (mbox_sync_update_header): assertion failed: (ctx->mail.uid != 0 ||
ctx->pseudo)
This is happening for dozens of users. Anyone have a suggestion of what
to adjust? It was happening somewhat
2005 Oct 12
1
Problem with a barplot...
...strat.col)
where s.strats.in is a matrix with a number of rows that define the height
of each stacked bar. However, ever since I expanded the number of columns
from 100 to 500, the borders of the bars are overwhelming the plot (the bars
are proportionally smaller, and thus the colours are getting muddied by the
black borders). Changing the border colour doesn't help at all, and I was
hoping that there was a way to remove the borders of the bars (i.e. have
each bar snug right up against the next). I've tried varying any parameter
that seems to have the slightest relation, but no luck.
C...
2005 Nov 15
1
Mono encoding w/ a stereo source.
Crew,
I've run into something a little odd with the vorbis encoder and would
like some input.
I use SpacialAudio's SAM3 Broadcaster and am having problems with the
ogg encoder when I create a mono output stream. It seems as if the
signal level of the left and right sides are being combined before the
encoding process, leaving the sound muddy and overdriven. As such, if I
reduce
2011 Dec 01
3
[LLVMdev] anchoring explicit template instantiations
...oint))
return x_old;
- else
- return x_old + 1;
- } else
- llvm_unreachable("Error in APInt::sqrt computation");
- return x_old + 1;
+ return x_old + 1;
+ }
+ llvm_unreachable("Error in APInt::sqrt computation");
}
(a return after an llvm_unreachable - muddied up with a bit of
syntactic tidyup))
& I'll take the detailed discussion about -Wweak-vtables for template
instantiations to cfe-dev & see what they have to say.
- David
2009 Aug 20
0
[LLVMdev] error api for APInt / APFloat
On Aug 19, 2009, at 11:19 PM, Erick Tryzelaar wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 11:08 PM, Chris Lattner<clattner at apple.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> As we discussed on IRC, I don't think there is any reason for the
>> implementation of these methods to check these invariants. These
>> are clear
>> API invariants that the caller can check if needbe.
2006 Apr 09
1
how safe is it to rsync databases?
Hi people!
I've been hunting around the web for an answer to this question for a
couple of days now. I run the IT for a small company and i don't have
a lot of experience with the type of C-ISAM database application that
is used by my company, I deal with the general IT issues and call in
specialists when required. But I need to backup this 10GB database to
a disaster recovery
2013 Jan 03
1
[LLVMdev] Build Failure
David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> writes:
>>> Selfhost clang. Whenever we get a warning from Clang we either fix
>>> Clang or fix the build quite quickly.
>>
>> Not possible,
>
> Out of curiosity - why not? (sure, I realize everyone has internal
> build systems, etc, that they're ultimately integrating LLVM into -
> but that doesn't mean
2013 Jan 03
0
[LLVMdev] Build Failure
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 11:16 AM, <dag at cray.com> wrote:
> David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Selfhost clang. Whenever we get a warning from Clang we either fix
>> Clang or fix the build quite quickly.
>
> Not possible,
Out of curiosity - why not? (sure, I realize everyone has internal
build systems, etc, that they're ultimately
2013 Jan 03
0
[LLVMdev] Build Failure
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 10:52 AM, <dag at cray.com> wrote:
> David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> writes:
>
>> The other point Chandler was making, though, was that this sort of fix
>> means that other tools (Valgrind/MemSan) won't catch a broader class
>> of errors because we will have silenced them too.
>
> Does buildbot do a valgrind build with the
2009 Aug 20
2
[LLVMdev] error api for APInt / APFloat
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 11:08 PM, Chris Lattner<clattner at apple.com> wrote:
>
> As we discussed on IRC, I don't think there is any reason for the
> implementation of these methods to check these invariants. These are clear
> API invariants that the caller can check if needbe. Making the
> implementation check these will slow down clients which are known to be well
>
2007 Jun 11
3
groups with spaces in their name
I''m trying to set puppet up to manage users and groups on an OpenBSD
Samba server, but puppet doesn''t want to handle group names with spaces.
I know this horribly ugly, but compatibility with windows clients seems
to demand groups like "Domain Users" and "Domain Computers", and puppet
chokes on them even though the underlying OS handles them at least well
2020 Jul 06
2
Issues with FLOCK on NFS Share
On 7/6/20 11:00 AM, Rowland penny via samba wrote:
> On 06/07/2020 16:29, Georg.Biberger--- via samba wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Get same output with "getent passwd qqeda11" and with "cat /etc/passwd | grep
>> 'qqeda11'"
>> qqeda11:x:79846:65600:Project Account for EDA:/home/qqeda11:/bin/bash
>> When you say it is not supported, do
2017 Oct 03
2
TargetMachine vs LLVMTargetMachine
On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 8:54 AM Hal Finkel via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> On 10/02/2017 10:57 PM, Matthias Braun via llvm-dev wrote:
>
> The distinction between the LLVMTargetMachine and TargetMachine classes
> has become somewhat muddy recently. So I created:
>
> https://reviews.llvm.org/D38482
>
> to clean things up. During review it was
2015 Aug 18
1
A few questions for the braintrust
I have a few questions to throw out to the collective braintrust.
1. in core/fs/pxe/tftp.c, when communicating using udp, in connecting,
transmitting and receiving functions, errors are not communicated to the
user. In fact the comment after transmit specifies "/* If the WRITE call
fails, we let the timeout take care of it... */"
The question is: Should we notify the user that there