search for: msg00221

Hey guys, I'm having trouble with PRIx64 and buddies in the X86 target on SLES 11. After searching, my issue seems like a generic problem with PRI support on different OS's. Here's a decent description of my problem: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/2006-10/msg00221.html Any suggested methods to correct for <inttypes.h> not having the proper macros defined (besides defining the macros myself)? Has anyone else had trouble with these macros? Ty, Cameron -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.ll...

Hello, I have the exact same problem as mentioned in this post,(http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-users/2005-06/msg00221.html) (or see the bottom of this post) Yet the conversation was continued elsewhere, is this a bug or somthing stupid.. or more importantly is there a solution? Thanks! ~Rob ---(Quote From Archives)--- "Hi Folks, I am trying to get my wireless network card work under dom0 of XEN. I could su...

Hi there. Would some kind soul please refer me to instructions for building an arm-elf-gcc that'll compile the Tremor sources? (In particular, what sources to get and where, and what to build in what order.) I'm developing on Debian Woody i386, but I'll happily take whatever advice you can send my way. I'm no expert in the field of compiler building, but I can't seem to

....redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1789279 It took me quite some time to go through the whole rfc 4122 just to realize we do not need to do anything with the versions. v3: - Do the check in precheck - Fix for Lazy evaluation of regexp UUID v2: - https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2020-January/msg00221.html - Use EEXIST instead of EINVAL - Put the colliding UUID into the error - Do not evaluate the PCRE needlessly multiple times v1: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2020-January/msg00184.html Martin Kletzander (2): rhv-upload: Validate UUIDs passed to -oo rhv-disk-uuid (RHBZ#17892...

v2 was here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2019-September/msg00221.html I think this is more like "the one". It handles reopen failing correctly, and there is a second test for that. I also ran my sshd tests locally and it worked in all scenarios I could think up (except of course sshd not being available at the start, but we want that to fail). Rich...