search for: msg00158

Hi all, i have same question as this one https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvirt-users/2014-March/msg00158.html. ( Only im using python) Is there any new follow-up on this? Thanks

...ed partitions. It uses lsblk to pair the underlying LUKS block device with its mapped name. To sparsify a LUKS-encrypted device, it needs to be opened using --allow-discards. Support for the argument was submitted as a separate patch [1]. [1] https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2020-January/msg00158.html Jan Synacek (1): sparsify: support LUKS-encrypted partitions daemon/listfs.ml | 19 ++++++++++++++++--- daemon/luks.c | 9 +++++---- generator/actions_core.ml | 3 ++- gobject/Makefile.inc | 2 ++ inspector/inspector.c | 2 +- sparsify/in_place.ml |...

...ed partitions. It uses lsblk to pair the underlying LUKS block device with its mapped name. To sparsify a LUKS-encrypted device, it needs to be opened using --allow-discards. Support for the argument was submitted as a separate patch [1]. [1] https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2020-January/msg00158.html Jan Synacek (1): sparsify: support LUKS-encrypted partitions daemon/listfs.ml | 19 ++++++++++++++++--- daemon/luks.c | 9 +++++---- generator/actions_core.ml | 3 ++- gobject/Makefile.inc | 2 ++ inspector/inspector.c | 2 +- sparsify/in_place.ml |...

...ed partitions. It uses lsblk to pair the underlying LUKS block device with its mapped name. To sparsify a LUKS-encrypted device, it needs to be opened using --allow-discards. Support for the argument was submitted as a separate patch [1]. [1] https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2020-January/msg00158.html Jan Synacek (1): sparsify: support LUKS-encrypted partitions daemon/listfs.ml | 19 ++++++++++++++++--- daemon/luks.c | 9 +++++---- generator/actions_core.ml | 3 ++- gobject/Makefile.inc | 2 ++ inspector/inspector.c | 2 +- sparsify/in_place.ml |...

Dear Patrice, I have noticed that you are referencing to the Stahnma repository for Spacewalk Client Tools. These are quite old and I would suggest to use the tools from: http://spacewalk.redhat.com/yum instead. Mr. Suchy already pushed some of the packages to Fedora/EPEL so they might be available there, soon. Besides that the Spacewalk Team is thinking about a split between client/server on

The following patch attempts to implement sparsification of LUKS-encrypted partitions. It uses lsblk to pair the underlying LUKS block device with its mapped name. Also, --allow-discards was added by default to luks_open(). There are several potential issues that I can think of: 1) If and entire device is encrypted (not just one of more partitions), the lsblk trick might not work. 2) The

Hi! Say I export an LVM logical volume from dom0 as /dev/xvda to the domU: disk = [ ''phy:xenimages/stan,xvda,w'' ] No I can lvresize xenimages/stan in dom0, but the domU stays ignorant of this change. How could I propagate the resize to the domU without rebooting or temporarily breaking its connection to /dev/xvda? Sort of a SCSI rescan, perhaps? -- Thanks, Feri.

...t separately from the rest of the output/errors of the tool used. For example, the proposed --print-estimate for virt-v2v [1] could print human output (just like the --print-source), while printing e.g. JSON to the machine-readable stream. [1] https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2018-August/msg00158.html Thanks, Pino Toscano (2): common/mltools: getopt: add Getopt.OptString OCaml tools: add output selection for --machine-readable builder/cmdline.ml | 12 ++++---- builder/repository_main.ml | 2 +- common/mltools/getopt-c.c | 20 ++++++++++++- common/mltools/getop...

...t separately from the rest of the output/errors of the tool used. For example, the proposed --print-estimate for virt-v2v [1] could print human output (just like the --print-source), while printing e.g. JSON to the machine-readable stream. [1] https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2018-August/msg00158.html Changes from v1: - adjusted the formatting for help text in patch #1 - moved all the machine_readable machinery in Tools_utils - expose all in a single machine_readable () function - add a test - add the documentation bits Thanks, Pino Toscano (2): common/mltools: getopt: add Getopt.OptS...

v1: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-September/msg00135.html v2: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-September/msg00158.html v3 is almost identical to v2, but I have added 4 extra commits to almost finish the job of replacing Str everywhere possible (note it's not possible to replace Str in common/mlstdutils or the generator because those are pure OCaml). As before there is an outstanding question: > I won...