search for: msg00117

...it is fine" I don't think it's fine. As I showed here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2020-June/msg00115.html in permissive mode labels are still being updated on disk. TBH I don't understand what you said here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2020-June/msg00117.html about "both the labels and the policy may be all wrong". If the administrator set the policy to permissive then labels ought still to be updated when the guest is running, and we ought to try to keep them updated if we can in v2v. It's also fine for an administrator to switch...

...> https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2020-June/msg00115.html > > in permissive mode labels are still being updated on disk. This is true for default labels, yes. > TBH I don't understand what you said here: > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2020-June/msg00117.html > > about "both the labels and the policy may be all wrong". If the > administrator set the policy to permissive then labels ought still to > be updated when the guest is running, and we ought to try to keep them > updated if we can in v2v. There are various cases w...

Hello, I have a postfix server which uses procmail as its delivery agent to deliver incoming messages to several maildirs. For several reasons, not really relevant here, I need to process/refilter/sort again the content of these mailboxes before delivering the messages to the _other_ maildirs which Dovecot sees and serves to local or remote imap users. Basically, I need to write some shell

Hi, this patch replaces the first simpler version: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-August/msg00117.html The approach now is to use a C snippet, which should pose way less compatibility issues. Thanks, Pino Toscano (1): Switch binary embedding to a C source .gitignore | 2 +- src/Makefile.am | 18 +++++++++--------- src/{bin2s.pl => bin2c.pl} | 24 +++++++++--...

Continuation/rework of: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2020-May/msg00020.html This is my approach, as I explained here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1828952#c4 https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2020-May/msg00035.html IOW: do not attempt to relabel if the guest is not enforcing, as it is either useless or may fail; few words more are in the comments of patch #3.

Patch v2 was here: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2019-April/thread.html#00114 There's no change here except that I've rebased it against the latest master branch and retested. There was a comment by Pino (https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2019-April/msg00117.html) which isn't incorporated into this patch. Rich.

...9/threads.html#01106 http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2005-10/threads.html#00205 [2] http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2005-10/msg00078.html [3] the alignment of long long on 32-bit x86 is 4 bytes, not 8 http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2005-10/msg00117.html [4] the original incarnation of GUEST_HANDLE http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2005-10/msg00205.html -- Hollis Blanchard IBM Linux Technology Center _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensourc...