search for: msg00118

...ct (cve.mitre.org) has assigned the name CAN-2005-2498 to this issue. All Users of PHP-5 from the CentOSPlus Repo should upgrade to these updated packages. More info is available at: http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2005-748.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-announce-list/2005-August/msg00118.html ------------------------ The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: php-5.0.4-3.centos4.i386.rpm php-bcmath-5.0.4-3.centos4.i386.rpm php-dba-5.0.4-3.centos4.i386.rpm php-devel-5.0.4-3.centos4.i386.rpm php-gd-5.0.4-3.centos4.i386.rpm php-ima...

On Tuesday, 27 June 2017 13:55:54 CEST Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Previously posted in 2015: > v1: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2015-June/msg00048.html > v2: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2015-June/msg00118.html > > I have rebased and tidied up the patches, fixing a few spelling > mistakes, but they are broadly the same as before. I also ran all the > tests, which pass. > > As with the previous versions, this makes a change to the API, where > you can no longer pass a handle be...

Hi, I''ve installed XCP-0.5 and openxenmanager/xenwebmanager shows me a thirty days license. Is it only for my confusion or aren''t the licensing components not removed ( http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-users/2010-01/msg00118.html ) or do i need someting like a license file for 0.5? Thanks Christian _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Hi folks, I'm trying to connect to a vSphere cluster using the information from the libvirt documentation. ------------------- $ virsh -c "vpx://root at 10.51.4.11/dc1/dc1-cluster-e01/dc1-vsphere-e04/?no_verify=1" Enter root's password for 10.51.4.11: error: internal error HTTP response code 400 for call to 'Login' error: failed to connect to the hypervisor

...ct (cve.mitre.org) has assigned the name CAN-2005-2498 to this issue. All Users of PHP-5 from the CentOSPlus Repo should upgrade to these updated packages. More info is available at: http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2005-748.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-announce-list/2005-August/msg00118.html ------------------------ The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: php-5.0.4-3.centos4.i386.rpm php-bcmath-5.0.4-3.centos4.i386.rpm php-dba-5.0.4-3.centos4.i386.rpm php-devel-5.0.4-3.centos4.i386.rpm php-gd-5.0.4-3.centos4.i386.rpm php-ima...

...ct (cve.mitre.org) has assigned the name CAN-2005-2498 to this issue. All Users of PHP-5 from the CentOSPlus Repo should upgrade to these updated packages. More info is available at: http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2005-748.html https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-announce-list/2005-August/msg00118.html ------------------------ The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: x86_64: php-5.0.4-3.centos4.x86_64.rpm php-bcmath-5.0.4-3.centos4.x86_64.rpm php-dba-5.0.4-3.centos4.x86_64.rpm php-devel-5.0.4-3.centos4.x86_64.rpm php-gd-5.0.4-3.centos4.x86_64...

http was missing in emulate_zero, so the code would fail with NameError. This can happen only when communicating with old imageio versions not supporting the "zero" feature. Testing with qemu-img 2.12 show that we never send emulated zero request because of the highestwrite mechanism, but it can break with older qemu-img-rhev used on RHEL. --- v2v/rhv-upload-plugin.py | 2 ++ 1 file

Previously posted in 2015: v1: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2015-June/msg00048.html v2: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2015-June/msg00118.html I have rebased and tidied up the patches, fixing a few spelling mistakes, but they are broadly the same as before. I also ran all the tests, which pass. As with the previous versions, this makes a change to the API, where you can no longer pass a handle between threads and expect guestfs_la...

Previously posted in 2015: v1: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2015-June/msg00048.html v2: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2015-June/msg00118.html This series was posted about 4 weeks ago: v3: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2017-June/msg00287.html There is no change in this series except I rebased it against current upstream head and retested. Last time there was some discussion and patch review, but no change appears to b...