search for: msg00092

...ndle. However after recent changes we don't > need it. We can use ‘b->next’ as nxdata, and the handle is passed to > us by the calling functions. > > Inspired by Eric Blakes observations in this email: Blake's > https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2020-February/msg00092.html > --- > server/filters.c | 217 ++++++++++++++++------------------------------- > 1 file changed, 73 insertions(+), 144 deletions(-) > > @@ -216,201 +205,181 @@ plugin_magic_config_key (struct backend *b) > static int > next_open (void *nxdata, int readonly) >...

...we don't > >need it. We can use ‘b->next’ as nxdata, and the handle is passed to > >us by the calling functions. > > > >Inspired by Eric Blakes observations in this email: > > Blake's > > >https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2020-February/msg00092.html > >--- > > server/filters.c | 217 ++++++++++++++++------------------------------- > > 1 file changed, 73 insertions(+), 144 deletions(-) > > > > >@@ -216,201 +205,181 @@ plugin_magic_config_key (struct backend *b) > > static int > > next_open (...

Hi, can you tell me please, how to dump the volume boot record of a VM image's partition? Cheers, adrelanos

Hi, Earlier I was having libvirt-0.7.5 but now I have installed 0.9.8 version of libvirt now. I am trying to start libvirt daemon using the command below but daemon it is not getting started and the PID file is not getting created. Tried /usr/loval/sbin/libvirtd -d option too. In that case I am not getting any error but PID file is not getting created in this case too.

Hello list! http://www.redhat.com/about/news/prarchive/2009/rhel_5_3.html kernel (2.6.18-128.el5) changelog: http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2009-0225.html -- Pasi

...th revisiting how our API for list mode should actually work [1] (so that we can reuse a single connection for both grabbing the list and finally using NBD_OPT_GO), but this change was easier to whip together while still thinking about that. [1] https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2020-July/msg00092.html Eric Blake (2): api: Get description alongside name from NBD_REP_SERVER info: Expose description in list mode lib/internal.h | 7 +++++- generator/API.ml | 21 ++++++++++++++++-- generator/states-newstyle-opt-list.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++------...

...of ’b->next’ and the real filter handle. However after recent changes we don't need it. We can use ‘b->next’ as nxdata, and the handle is passed to us by the calling functions. Inspired by Eric Blakes observations in this email: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2020-February/msg00092.html --- server/filters.c | 217 ++++++++++++++++------------------------------- 1 file changed, 73 insertions(+), 144 deletions(-) diff --git a/server/filters.c b/server/filters.c index c916217c..92b0ceb3 100644 --- a/server/filters.c +++ b/server/filters.c @@ -49,16 +49,6 @@ struct backend_filt...

It's confusing to use the same terminology for a single backend as for the linked list of backends. In particular it's often not clear if we're calling the next backend or the whole chain of backends. --- server/internal.h | 14 ++++++++++-- server/connections.c | 20 ++++++++--------- server/locks.c | 2 +- server/main.c

Hi there, Diffs to v8: * Remove the regex to increment the revision: Index_parser.get_entry() only handles integers * Fix Pino's comments Cédric Bosdonnat (6): builder: rename docs test script builder: add a template parameter to get_index builder: add Index.write_entry function mllib: add XPath helper xpath_get_nodes() builder: remove useless fish dependency New tool: