search for: msg00053

...ile system, fsck reports that the inode which "foo" now points to has an incorrect refcount and increments that particular inode's ref-count to 2. There was a mail on ext3-users about a year ago reporting a similar problem: https://listman.redhat.com/archives/ext3-users/2002-October/msg00053.html I don't know if it was fixed. In my code, I'm using only vfs calls and do nothing that is specific to ext3. This works fine on ext3 and ext2 without HTrees, but this behavior occurs on ext3 with Htrees. Here's a high level description of what I'm doing in versionfs_unlink:...

There is a new Web Application Stack that I would like to get the RPMS for into CentOS Plus. I am trying to get the upstream provider to the provide these SRPMS to their public FTP server, but so far they are not there: https://www.redhat.com/archives/nahant-list/2006-October/msg00053.html These RPMS would be a major add to CentOSPlus .... as they would provide an enterprise web stack with update support. I am just not sure if or when the source is going to be released. So, that being said, I am looking for a way that the CentOS team can have access to those SRPMS to build th...

There is a new Web Application Stack that I would like to get the RPMS for into CentOS Plus. I am trying to get the upstream provider to the provide these SRPMS to their public FTP server, but so far they are not there: https://www.redhat.com/archives/nahant-list/2006-October/msg00053.html These RPMS would be a major add to CentOSPlus .... as they would provide an enterprise web stack with update support. I am just not sure if or when the source is going to be released. So, that being said, I am looking for a way that the CentOS team can have access to those SRPMS to build th...

> > according to the documentation the option ucode=scan should tell XEN to > > look for a microcode update in an uncompressed initrd. > > > > While I don?t use the Debian kernel the tools to generate the initrd are > > part of Debian. The command ?cpio -i < /boot/initrd.img-4.0.2-Dom0? > > creates the directory structure

Hi, By running some scripts on our target system for a while, I lost all means of access to the system. It seems that the kernel is crashed with the following error message: Assertion failure in do_get_write_access() at transaction.c:731: "(((jh2bh(jh))->b_state & (1UL << BH_Uptodate)) != 0)" Oops: Exception in kernel mode, sig: 4 We are currently running Linux version

Package: xen-hypervisor-4.5-amd64 Version: 4.5.0-1 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, according to the documentation the option ucode=scan should tell XEN to look for a microcode update in an uncompressed initrd. While I don?t use the Debian kernel the tools to generate the initrd are part of Debian. The command ?cpio -i < /boot/initrd.img-4.0.2-Dom0? creates the directory structure

...lright. >Is the initramfs compressed? The scanning code can't deal if the [stse at osgiliath]: file /boot/initrd.img-4.0.2-Dom0 /boot/initrd.img-4.0.2-Dom0: ASCII cpio archive (SVR4 with no CRC) I don?t think the initrd is compressed. http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-users/2014-05/msg00053.html says that I have to use ?cpio -H newc? not ?cpio -o c?, but I don?t know how the Debian tools create the initrd. Shade and sweet water! Stephan -- | Stephan Seitz E-Mail: stse at fsing.rootsland.net | | Public Keys: http://fsing.rootsland.net/~stse/keys.html | -------------- ne...

...virt-manager. However, this thread from 2009 might provide some guidance on getting around that. I have not followed it so it might be a dead end. But, the lead is free so 'youse pays yer monies and yer takes yer chances'. https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-desktop-list/2009-October/msg00053.html -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrne mailto:ByrneJB at Harte-Lyne.ca Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757 Canada L...

On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 11:01:02AM +0100, Vincent Danjean wrote: > [resend to the good (cloned) bug, sorry for the message in the original bug, > it was a mistake] > > Hi, > > On Thu, 5 Dec 2019 11:12:56 +0000 "Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones@redhat.com> wrote: > > I believe this is a new bug and nothing much to do with: > >

...n-devel. CC-s added. > I assume you refer to this discussion which happend to be on the > xen-users mailing list: > http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-users/2014-05/msg00052.html > > Especially look at the first answer > (http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-users/2014-05/msg00053.html). This says "not 'cpio -o c' as some information on the internet suggests", do you have a link? Is it to something the xenproject controls and could update (i.e. our wiki and/or in tree docs?) Cheers, Ian. > Following those points mentioned in there should get you up and...

Hi, I have been working on a Python application that uses hivex. Meanwhile I have encountered some Python bindings issues which could be fixed. The next issue I see now is about the value_value function. This is briefly documented as: "return data length, data type and data of a value". For Perl, Python and OCaml, this is not true. A tuple is returned for both without the length

...ssed? The scanning code can't deal if the > > [stse at osgiliath]: file /boot/initrd.img-4.0.2-Dom0 > /boot/initrd.img-4.0.2-Dom0: ASCII cpio archive (SVR4 with no CRC) > > I don?t think the initrd is compressed. > > http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-users/2014-05/msg00053.html says > that I have to use ?cpio -H newc? not ?cpio -o c?, but I don?t know how > the Debian tools create the initrd. The intel-microcode package contains: /usr/share/initramfs-tools/hooks/intel_microcode which will be called during initamfs generation. It seems to call iucode_tool, f...

...ther language bindings return a tuple / list / array with just two elements as the length can be found from the value? Kind regards, Peter https://lekensteyn.nl [0]: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2014-August/msg00050.html [1]: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2014-August/msg00053.html [2]: https://github.com/Lekensteyn/hivex/compare/master...develop

Basically the issue comes down to my Volume Groups not being found by this initrd, causing good ole kernel panic. initrd-2.6.12.6-xen3_12.1_rhel4.1.img [root@xen01 lvm]# uname -a Linux xen01.inside.***.com 2.6.9-22.0.2.ELsmp #1 SMP Thu Jan 5 17:13:01 EST 2006 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux [root@xen01 lvm]# cat /etc/redhat-release Red Hat Enterprise Linux ES release 4 (Nahant Update 2) Everything

Hej folks, I''ve been trying to get a new machine up and running with the latest Xen for a while on a Slackware64 (current) machine. After installing Xen from source and building a new kernel with all xen options enabled I haven''t been able to get the machine to behave. The machine is a brand new dual opteron 6212 on a Supermicro H8DGi board with 64G ECC memory. Running a stock

Hej folks, I''ve been trying to get a new machine up and running with the latest Xen for a while on a Slackware64 (current) machine. After installing Xen from source and building a new kernel with all xen options enabled I haven''t been able to get the machine to behave. The machine is a brand new dual opteron 6212 on a Supermicro H8DGi board with 64G ECC memory. Running a stock