search for: msdns

Hello Sebastian, Am 08.03.2015 um 20:33 schrieb Sebastian Henrich: > I found a way to delete these ghost entries. All you need is an LDAP > tool like Apache Directory Studio. Then you connect via LDAP to the AD. > Inside the LDAP tree is a subtree named msdns (or similiar, I'm not able > to access my workstation at the moment). There you can find the buggy > entry and delete it. Before deleting something it's perhaps a good idea > to make a backup of the samba configuration, especially the files under > /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb...

Dear list, I have a strange problem. In RSAT is had a typo when adding a reverse lookup entry, i.e. I added something like "host.samdo.com" instead of "host.samdom.com". No a reverse lookup yields to entries, the correct one and the misspelled one. :-( Deleting it in RSAT is impossible, as the misspelled entry doesn't show up here. Deleting in by samba-tool is

...stian, >> >> Am 08.03.2015 um 20:33 schrieb Sebastian Henrich: >>> I found a way to delete these ghost entries. All you need is an LDAP >>> tool like Apache Directory Studio. Then you connect via LDAP to the >AD. >>> Inside the LDAP tree is a subtree named msdns (or similiar, I'm not >able >>> to access my workstation at the moment). There you can find the >buggy >>> entry and delete it. Before deleting something it's perhaps a good >idea >>> to make a backup of the samba configuration, especially the files >u...

...e they always been there (it sounds like they started recently). If they started recently, has anything changed ? software updates etc From the log fragment, you seem to be using '.local' (unless this is sanitisation) if so what is the 'hosts' line in /etc/hosts ? does it reference msdns, if it does, removing this may fix your problem. Rowland

Hi, I found a way to delete these ghost entries. All you need is an LDAP tool like Apache Directory Studio. Then you connect via LDAP to the AD. Inside the LDAP tree is a subtree named msdns (or similiar, I'm not able to access my workstation at the moment). There you can find the buggy entry and delete it. Before deleting something it's perhaps a good idea to make a backup of the samba configuration, especially the files under /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb.d where the configu...

...21:13: > Hello Sebastian, > > Am 08.03.2015 um 20:33 schrieb Sebastian Henrich: >> I found a way to delete these ghost entries. All you need is an LDAP >> tool like Apache Directory Studio. Then you connect via LDAP to the AD. >> Inside the LDAP tree is a subtree named msdns (or similiar, I'm not able >> to access my workstation at the moment). There you can find the buggy >> entry and delete it. Before deleting something it's perhaps a good idea >> to make a backup of the samba configuration, especially the files under >> /var/lib/samba...

...>> Am 08.03.2015 um 20:33 schrieb Sebastian Henrich: >>>> I found a way to delete these ghost entries. All you need is an LDAP >>>> tool like Apache Directory Studio. Then you connect via LDAP to the >> AD. >>>> Inside the LDAP tree is a subtree named msdns (or similiar, I'm not >> able >>>> to access my workstation at the moment). There you can find the >> buggy >>>> entry and delete it. Before deleting something it's perhaps a good >> idea >>>> to make a backup of the samba configuration,...

...omain. I suspect there is something related to how my company's directory was setup and I can't change that. Here are the information for the AD: Realm: WIN-NET.DOMAIN.COM.BR DNS Domain: domain.com.br Servers: server.domain.com.br, server1.domain.com.br NOTE: DNS servers are not in the MSDNS server. And there is no DNS domain related to the realm WIN-NET.DOMAIN.COM.BR, only domain.com.br. Here is my krb5.conf = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = ======================================================================== [libdefaults] default_realm = WIN-NET.DOMAIN...

...ted recently). If they started recently, has > > anything changed ? software updates etc > > > > From the log fragment, you seem to be using '.local' (unless this is > > sanitisation) if so what is the 'hosts' line in /etc/hosts ? does it > > reference msdns, if it does, removing this may fix your problem. > > > > Rowland > >.local is correct. the xxxx is the sanitation > >What changed was that a stinkin' Western Digital SATA hard drive did not >support hot swap, corrupted my os, and I had to reinstall Fedora 26. >I w...

...ounds like they started recently). If they started recently, has > anything changed ? software updates etc > > From the log fragment, you seem to be using '.local' (unless this is > sanitisation) if so what is the 'hosts' line in /etc/hosts ? does it > reference msdns, if it does, removing this may fix your problem. > > Rowland .local is correct. the xxxx is the sanitation What changed was that a stinkin' Western Digital SATA hard drive did not support hot swap, corrupted my os, and I had to reinstall Fedora 26. I wsas out till 06:00 in the morn...

I am trying to add 127.0.0.1 to my resolv.conf. I added it through the system-config-network but if I reboot, its gone. I do not have the caching nameserver package installed. My ISP's nameservers are there. It must have something to do with DHCP. Also, in the network config GUI, should I select the IPv6 option for either or both network cards? TIA

...recently, has > > > anything changed ? software updates etc > > > > > > From the log fragment, you seem to be using '.local' (unless this is > > > sanitisation) if so what is the 'hosts' line in /etc/hosts ? does it > > > reference msdns, if it does, removing this may fix your problem. > > > > > > Rowland > > > >.local is correct. the xxxx is the sanitation > > > >What changed was that a stinkin' Western Digital SATA hard drive did not > >support hot swap, corrupted my os,...

On Wed, 06 Sep 2017 13:05:40 -0700 toddandmargo via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > ---- On Wed, 06 Sep 2017 12:59:47 -0700 toddandmargo via > samba<samba at lists.samba.org> wrote ---- > > > > > > ---- On Wed, 06 Sep 2017 12:46:56 -0700 Rowland Penny via > > samba<samba at lists.samba.org> wrote ---- > > >