search for: ms3

...dovecot components to use and how to order them in the network path from client to mail store. If I have say 1,000 users, all stored in MySQL (or LDAP) and have 4 mail stores, configured into 2, 2 node pods. MS1 and MS2 are pod1 and are configured with replication (dsync) and host users 0-500. MS3 and MS4 are pod2 and are configured with replication between them and host users 501-1000. Ideally the active connections in pod1 would be split 50/50 between MS1 and MS2. When maintenance is performed obviously all active connections/users would be moved to the other node in the pod and then re...

...network path from client to mail store. >> >> >> If I have say 1,000 users, all stored in MySQL (or LDAP) and have 4 mail stores, configured into 2, 2 node pods. >> >> >> MS1 and MS2 are pod1 and are configured with replication (dsync) and host users 0-500. MS3 and MS4 are pod2 and are configured with replication between them and host users 501-1000. Ideally the active connections in pod1 would be split 50/50 between MS1 and MS2. When maintenance is performed obviously all active connections/users would be moved to the other node in the pod and then re...

...how to order them in the network path from client to mail store. > > > If I have say 1,000 users, all stored in MySQL (or LDAP) and have 4 mail stores, configured into 2, 2 node pods. > > > MS1 and MS2 are pod1 and are configured with replication (dsync) and host users 0-500. MS3 and MS4 are pod2 and are configured with replication between them and host users 501-1000. Ideally the active connections in pod1 would be split 50/50 between MS1 and MS2. When maintenance is performed obviously all active connections/users would be moved to the other node in the pod and then re...

...t to mail store. >>> >>> >>> If I have say 1,000 users, all stored in MySQL (or LDAP) and have 4 mail stores, configured into 2, 2 node pods. >>> >>> >>> MS1 and MS2 are pod1 and are configured with replication (dsync) and host users 0-500. MS3 and MS4 are pod2 and are configured with replication between them and host users 501-1000. Ideally the active connections in pod1 would be split 50/50 between MS1 and MS2. When maintenance is performed obviously all active connections/users would be moved to the other node in the pod and then re...

...;>>> >>>> >>>> If I have say 1,000 users, all stored in MySQL (or LDAP) and have 4 mail stores, configured into 2, 2 node pods. >>>> >>>> >>>> MS1 and MS2 are pod1 and are configured with replication (dsync) and host users 0-500. MS3 and MS4 are pod2 and are configured with replication between them and host users 501-1000. Ideally the active connections in pod1 would be split 50/50 between MS1 and MS2. When maintenance is performed obviously all active connections/users would be moved to the other node in the pod and then re...

...like to use the data to draw a phylogenetic tree, so that I can infer which ms was copied from which. The error presence/absence is coded in binary format. The plan is to use a maximun parsimony tree approach. The data looks like this toy example: "ms1" "ms2" "ms3" "ms4" "err1" 0 1 0 0 "err2" 0 0 1 1 "err3" 1 1 0 0 "err4" 0 0 0 1 "err5" 1 1 1 0 "err6" 1 1 0 1 "err7&...

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46956 Bug #: 46956 Summary: Selecting 2xAntiAliasing causes Nexuiz to crash "X Error: BadMatch, failed request (X_CreateWindow)" Classification: Unclassified Product: Mesa Version: git Platform: x86-64 (AMD64) OS/Version: Linux (All) Status:

...gt; **14. Able to see linux shares in Network Neighborhood, but cannot >> browse. Error: "The Network path was not found." on the windows machine, can you type : nbtstat -a SAMBA_netbios_name nbtstat -a IP_ADRESS_SAMBA and give us the smb.conf thanks Return-Path: <jpowell@ms3.ynec.nec.co.jp> Delivered-To: samba@samba.org Received: from TYO201.gate.nec.co.jp (TYO201.gate.nec.co.jp [202.32.8.214]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C8BC4453 for <samba@samba.org>; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 17:53:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailgate4.nec.co.jp ([10.7.69.193])...

Dear all: I've found one strange things. I am using Red Hat Linux 5.2 and Samba 2.0.6. (I rebuild the RPM in RH 5.2) The samba is treated as a Server. Every windows 95/98/NT could access the samba server without problem. In windows 2000 RC2 (treated as client), it could access the samba server. But if I enable the "IP Security Policies on Local Machine". (You can enable

Dear all: I used the samba-2.0.6 under Red Hat 5.2 for a period of time. (I used samba server, not client.) It works fine. Recently, I found one strange problem when I use "Find Computer" from MS-Windows 98. I hope someone could help me to solve this problem. ----> Samba Server got a user (user1) with a password (pass1) (Both /etc/passwd and /etc/smbpasswd used this username and