search for: mouch

...e different sizes. This minimizes bit padding loss. Also to be compatible with the ACM you need to create a WAVEFORMATEX header that is exactly like in my ACM. I recommend against using the Speex API to create wave files that try to be playable with the ACM. Way too mouch trouble. Of course you could write a program that talks directly to the ACM and then create the WAVE file based on the data returned by the ACM (for example using the AVIFile API provided by Windows). But that is quite complicated. Definitely more troublesome than...

...hat. Assuming > the servers are using tcp you could control the acks (more to the > point the windows) you send back to limit the rate at which they send > to you. yes, i tryed this: class 1:1 .... prio 1 <-- web request class 1:2 .... prio 2 <-- acks class ..... but with not to mouch resoult. the logic i came with is: i send prio 1 the web request, but my provider don''t send it prio 1 too, and/or the result of the request, get into the provider R2 shaper and get fifo with all the other packets (download mostly), so i get none gain. so the concluzion is that i can...

But using the ACM codec I just need to put the speex content into the wave file data chunk and then windows will play it? Miguel Gomes -----Mensagem original----- De: owner-speex-dev@xiph.org em nome de Matthias Granberry Enviada: qui 04-03-2004 11:53 Para: speex-dev@xiph.org Cc: Assunto: Re: [speex-dev] Speex, what container?

I found these facts while in #ruby-lang irc? <duracell8> 1. Limited Pool of developers who know Ruby. Get developers to nominate if Ruby will be their secondary language. <duracell8> 2. The serving of Ruby Apps from Apache using FastCGI is broken the world over. It causes periodic process and database connection blowouts. Move to a Mongrel Pack. <duracell8> 3. Limited