search for: mothballed

...m linked against another Network Boot Program's implementation of HTTP (gpxe). Possibly problematic and slow on VMs. We also have a gpxecmd.c32 which doesn't seem to be documented in the "modules" section of the syslinux wiki. As separate projects we appear to have: 1. gpxe - a mothballed Network Boot Program but with a possibly problematic and slow HTTP implementation. 2. ipxe - an active fork of gpxe but still with the possibly problematic and slow HTTP implementation (?) I presume that for pxechn.c32 to use HTTP, then it has to have been loaded either by gpxelinux.0 or, preferab...

...thout immense effort (I tried 5 other versions of small linux distros from linuxiso.org before this one). The version of Samba I installed on this Suse box is 2.0.7. From what I have read, this version SHOULD work with Windows 2000. I had to look hard to find it on the SuSE site, because they have mothballed it off into an "obsolete/unsupported" directory. I was just glad to find it, since newer versions of the samba product fail the dependency checks on the rpm installer and would not work. Eventually, I may update to more recent code, but I didn't want to upgrade the entire system (yet)...

On 24/10/15 21:57, Doug Scoular via Syslinux wrote: > 1. gpxe - a mothballed Network Boot Program but with a possibly problematic > and slow HTTP implementation. > 2. ipxe - an active fork of gpxe but still with the possibly problematic > and slow HTTP implementation (?) iPXE's HTTP implementation is definitely not slow. On a Gigabit LAN, you should get the...

Hi everyone, I have a question concerning DNS SRV lookups. The situation is like this: - one central Asterisk server - many domains with SRV records, let's say we have bar.com and doe.com Now the question is: if the SRV lookup is done for foo@bar.com the call is mapped to foo@myasterisk.mydomain.net. Is that correct? If so, I have a problem: if somebody calls foo@bar.com, Asterisk

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 The server rebuild was a complete failure. For some reason, neither FC3 nor SuSE 9.2 like the graphics card in the box. I have reinstalled the old hard drive and the server is back on line. - -Tom - -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net