search for: montie

Nothing much else to say. Vorbis 1.0 is officially out. Have at. Monty --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-dev-request@xiph.org' containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed. Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be

Nothing much else to say. Vorbis 1.0 is officially out. Have at. Monty --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-dev-request@xiph.org' containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the body. No subject is needed. Unsubscribe messages sent to the list will be

On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Monty Montgomery <monty at xiph.org> wrote: > Vorbis-dev might be better.... > My issue is with theora/thusnelda for xiph tools. > > What I mean is, you quoted a response from Frank Barchard, but I never > saw his response on the list. Are there blind CCs on the conversation? > I'm just trying to figure out where the rest of the

Hi all, we are upgrading our dovecot platform from: # dovecot --version 2.2.15.14 (39f57c379ded+) to # dovecot --version 2.3.2.1 (0719df592) Our platform is debian based and it is configured as director and backend proxy. We have just upgrade only 4 servers (2 directors and 2 backends) and when the lmtp traffic flow goes through an upgraded director and a not-upgraded backend sometimes the

At some stage (possibly commit r17268) oggpack_writecopy started to fail with some strings longer than 256 bytes and all strings longer than 512 bytes. Also it thrashes the stack with very long strings. Lithopsian

Hi, Op 07/08/2018 om 09:35 schreef Gabriele Nencioni: > Hi all, > we are upgrading our dovecot platform from: > > # dovecot --version > 2.2.15.14 (39f57c379ded+) Great! A mummy from ancient times. That is going to make reproducing the circumstances here a bit difficult (difficult to get that compiled here anymore). I cannot reproduce anything like that so far with current

Hello! I tested some songs with the new code that Monty merged into the snapshot. It works better than the previous code ;-), but I noticed some strange noises made at high frequencies, even at very high bitrates : a continuous, high-pitched noise is added over the medium voice, and it sounds like a whistle. The previous code didn't do that. On the other hand, very low bitrates sound much

Apologies; a filter mistriggered on the original send of this message. Monty Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 01:11:16 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <200301100611.BAA12395@biohazard-cafe.mit.edu> To: vorbis@xiph.org From: ben-extra@MIT.EDU Subject: Hi, I am hoping for some guidance. I have a *bunch* of audio in the form of realaudio streams. As is, they are of a quality similar to fair AM quality.

> hmmm.. very interesting.. any info on how they've done the licensing ? No idea how the licensing works. If it's free for the streamer then that may destroy Vorbis's inroads into streaming. I'm hoping that Monty and others can improve Vorbis to start competing with AAC+ at low bitrates. Monty said he had some ideas but I wonder if anything is being worked on presently.

Good Morning; Iam asking whether any one have knowledge about is it possiple to incorporate a psycoacoustic model?(specifically?I mean ?MPEG-1 psychoacoustic model 1) into the CELT codec(any version even older versions of the coder,?no matter) Iam using version 0.3.2. Kind Regards; Osama. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hello all, Would somebody please comment on it? Thank you in advance. Monty wrote: Monty> "It depends". Vorbis will be able to do coupling such that Monty> joint stereo is exactly equivalent to L/R (reduction is in the Monty> range of 128->100 or so], or apply addiitonal stereo/spatial Monty> specific psychoacoustics to further reduce bitrate to eliminate Monty>

It's rather ironic that there has been more traffic generated regarding spam than actual spam. -----Original Message----- From: Ray Heasman [mailto:nurf@spamcop.net] Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 5:47 PM To: vorbis-dev@xiph.org Subject: Re: [vorbis-dev] GOOD BUSINESS FOR YOU <p>Hi Monty, There is a way around this. You can use TMDA, which will send back a confirmation request to

Hello, These last 2 months, I have talked again with Monty Montgomery about the NHW Project and he told me that Xiph.org would like to encourage the NHW Project development.That's just great! I'll see what Monty will do on his side (and when he has time), but he also told me that the NHW codec has merits but there must be an effort to demonstrate them. The advantages, merits of the NHW

Greetings. I am planning on getting my RHCE in the near future. I thinking I should wait until 6 comes out before proceeding. That being said, I don't want to wait past the end of this year. That being said, do you all have any information about how long it takes for their training platform to catch up to their release? Which is to say, if RHES 6 is released on day 1, at what point

Chris Pearce wrote: > Hi Guys & Gals, > > I need you guys to decide whether we want to include extra granulepos > fields to Skeleton 4. Given the underwhelming discussion regarding this, > I'm guessing the need and/or desire for these fields isn't really there. I haven't commented mostly because I don't know what Monty's plans for a "grand unified

Hi folks, My wife and I are taking a long weekend to celibrate our anniversary. I won't be around again until Wednesday to answer email or do anything else on Vorbis. Yeah, I know, I usually answer my email once a month anyway (so likely no one would notice me being gone), but just so folks know if anything really juicy comes up :-) I'll be merging my latest branch with mainline

So to which group should I foward my question? I thought this was the most appropriate of them all. Please guide me On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 8:59 PM, Monty Montgomery <monty at xiph.org> wrote: > I have the impression only a small piece of this conversation is being > forwarded to ogg-dev. We can't answer questions when we have no idea > what's going on :-) > >

Can I fix the checksum with a hex editor? Sent from my iPhone On Jun 25, 2009, at 3:23 PM, Monty Montgomery <monty at xiph.org> wrote: > Confirmed--- the checksum on the second page (the comment page where > the album art was added) is incorrect. Vorbis players are not allowed > to decode any stream in which one of the setup headers is corrupt, and > a bad checksum counts as

> Is there any way to understand exactly how it is invalid? I can replicate > this corruption simply by adding large album art to any ogg file with the > latest release of MediaMonkey. The second page is corrupt. The basic structure looks correct, first guess would be bad checksum. I'll look more closely in just a bit. This might explain why some players might accept it--- if

Hello list, I wonder if someone might be able to clear up something for me. I recently set up asterisk and have now managed to get the MeetMe application up and running. When I dial the extension to access the conference/MeetMe application, the only prompt I hear is:"You are currently the only person in this conference." When I use a friend's newly installed asterisk, I hear: