search for: modulos

I'm not mathematically gifted, but shouldn't 957%60 be 15 remainder 57? Google and my desktop calculator certainly think so. So where am I going wrong here? The following code exten => 7,1,Verbose(Context: ${CONTEXT} Exten:${EXTEN}) same => n,Set(myNum=957) same => n,Set(sec=$[REMAINDER(${myNum},60)]) same => n,Set(sec=$[ABS(${sec})]) same =>

Hi all, Sorry for bothering those not interested. I found that ARM backend will insert a modulo function (like __modsi3) instead of the modulo instruction. I wonder how we can inline the modulo function into the program. Is there any OPTION we can use in the opt or llc? Thanks, Ray -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

On 7/2/2018 3:16 PM, Sanjay Patel wrote: > I also agree that the per-element rotate for vectors is what we want for > this intrinsic. > > So I have this so far: > > declare i32 @llvm.catshift.i32(i32 %a, i32 %b, i32 %shift_amount) > declare <2 x i32> @llvm.catshift.v2i32(<2 x i32> %a, <2 x i32> %b, <2 x i32> %shift_amount) > > For

I have a problem integrating the 'standard map' ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_map http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_map ) with deSolve: By using the modulo-operator '%%' with 2*pi in the ODEs (standardmap1), the resulting values of P and Theta, should not be greater than 2pi. Because this was not the case, i was thinking that the function 'ode' has some

I was reading about the order of optimizations in the code generation stage here: http://llvm.org/docs/CodeGenerator.html#the-high-level-design-of-the-code-generator This is the part that's interesting to me: 3. SSA-based Machine Code Optimizations<http://llvm.org/docs/CodeGenerator.html#ssa-based-machine-code-optimizations>— This optional stage consists of a series of machine-code

On Jan 23, 2013, at 3:45 PM, ryan baird <ryanrbaird at gmail.com> wrote: > I was reading about the order of optimizations in the code generation stage here: http://llvm.org/docs/CodeGenerator.html#the-high-level-design-of-the-code-generator > > This is the part that's interesting to me: > > 3. SSA-based Machine Code Optimizations — This optional stage consists of a

I can't run a function which generates random numbrers using linear congruential generator. My multiplier is a=5+8^6, increment is b=1 and modulo is m=2^30. the code I have written works for modulo upto m=2^28. For m= 2^29 , it says, can not allocate memory for the vector or something like that. For m= 2^31 or more, its says the argument "for i in 1:m " is too large in

Hi Ehsan, In some cases modulo scheduling will insert copy instruction that end up as real copies in the final code. It unavoidable in some cases. For example, let's say a instruction defining a value is scheduled in the first iteration, but one of its uses is scheduled two iterations later. In this case, the kernel needs to create a copy because there will be two values live in the

Hi all, Could we modify the "%%" (modulo)-operator to include some tolerance for rounding-errors when supplied with doubles? It's not much work (patch supplied on the bottom), and I don't think it would break anything, only if you were really interested in analysing rounding differences. Any ideas about implementing this and overwriting base::`%%`, or would we want another

On 11/09/2018 11:23 AM, Emil Bode wrote: > Hi all, > > > > Could we modify the "%%" (modulo)-operator to include some tolerance for rounding-errors when supplied with doubles? > > It's not much work (patch supplied on the bottom), and I don't think it would break anything, only if you were really interested in analysing rounding differences. > >

On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 01:48:17AM -0800, edwintorok wrote: > Following the link to builder.ml from your blogpost I noticed the make_random_password () function, and I have some suggestions, well nitpicks really. See the 2 commits from this pull request. > > 1. Using Ocaml&#39;s buffered I/O means that one make_random_password() call reads 64k bytes from /dev/urandom which drops the

On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 03:11:45PM +0100, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 01:58:29PM +0000, Renato Golin wrote: > > I can see the error, and it's just a bad selection of choices. I was > > wrong in assuming that the "eabi" at the end would always force it: > > > > $ clang -target arm-elf-eabi -S mod.c -o - | grep mod > > .file

Hi Tim, Thanks for your reply. On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Ray, > > On 10 November 2014 10:13, Alex S <alexmountain13 at gmail.com> wrote: > > Sorry for bothering those not interested. I found that ARM backend will > > insert a modulo function > > (like __modsi3) instead of the modulo instruction.

Some time ago I tried to find out how to compute remainders in R. I now know that it is done with %%, which is documented in help('+'), but before someone told me that I tried: help('remainder'), help.search('remainder'), apropos('remainder') help('modulo'), help.search('modulo'), and apropos('modulo') all of which yielded nothing. I then

On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 01:58:29PM +0000, Renato Golin wrote: > I can see the error, and it's just a bad selection of choices. I was > wrong in assuming that the "eabi" at the end would always force it: > > $ clang -target arm-elf-eabi -S mod.c -o - | grep mod > .file "mod.c" > bl __modsi3 > bl __umodsi3 I was discussing this with Tim on IRC and he

Hi - I replied to the original sender only by mistake. Sorry about that. When we started working on the pipeliner, and added it before the scheduler, we also were concerned that the scheduler or other passes would undo the work of the pipeliner. The initial thought was that we would add information (using metadata or some other way like you've suggested) to the basic block to tell the

Duncan, I think Emil realizes that the floating point format isn't able to represent certain numbers, that's why he is suggesting this change rather than complaining about our arithmetic being broken. However, I agree with you that we should not adopt his proposal. It would not make things more "user friendly" for people. Everyone has a different application and a different use

Hello, does LLVM already have a Random Number Generator built into it's library somewhere? I know code generation is suppose to be deterministic, but when producing a random number can be deterministic if the random number generator is also deterministic. - Thanks - Jeff Kunkel

Hi all, I want to generate assembly code using Swing Modulo Scheduling in LLVM for many ALU (May could be Adders, multilayer ......), I need some help how I can do that, which commend I run? Also if possible more information about the scheduling and the register location ......, and which pass responsible about that, and which LLVM version support Swing Modulo Scheduling. Thank you. Regards

I am plugging this into my code. If someone wants to take it out and add it to the llvm library, it's a simple Linear Congruential Generator, but here it is: typedef struct random_number_gen { unsigned a, c, seed, m; random_number_gen( unsigned seed, unsigned modulo ) : seed(seed), m(modulo) { unsigned primes[] = { 2, 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 17, 19, 23, 29 };