search for: moduleboolattrs

...en/CodeGenOption.h" >> +#include "llvm/IR/Attributes.h" >> +#include "llvm/IR/Module.h" >> + >> +using namespace llvm; >> + >> +static std::map<std::string, bool> FunctionBoolAttrs; >> +static std::map<std::string, bool> ModuleBoolAttrs; >> + > > @Chris, should these be using ManagedStatic? > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev

.../IR/Attributes.h" >> >> +#include "llvm/IR/Module.h" >> >> + >> >> +using namespace llvm; >> >> + >> >> +static std::map<std::string, bool> FunctionBoolAttrs; >> >> +static std::map<std::string, bool> ModuleBoolAttrs; >> >> + >> > >> > @Chris, should these be using ManagedStatic? >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > LLVM Developers mailing list >> > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu >> > htt...

...en/CodeGenOption.h" >> +#include "llvm/IR/Attributes.h" >> +#include "llvm/IR/Module.h" >> + >> +using namespace llvm; >> + >> +static std::map<std::string, bool> FunctionBoolAttrs; >> +static std::map<std::string, bool> ModuleBoolAttrs; >> + > > @Chris, should these be using ManagedStatic? I’d much rather they just weren’t static at all. Using globals to store state that inherently isn’t global just feels wrong. -Chris -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists...

...+#include "llvm/IR/Module.h" >>>> >> + >>>> >> +using namespace llvm; >>>> >> + >>>> >> +static std::map<std::string, bool> FunctionBoolAttrs; >>>> >> +static std::map<std::string, bool> ModuleBoolAttrs; >>>> >> + >>>> > >>>> > @Chris, should these be using ManagedStatic? >>>> > >>>> > _______________________________________________ >>>> > LLVM Developers mailing list >>>> > LLVMdev at cs.ui...

I'm working on fixing PR21471, which is about embedding codegen command line options into the bitcode as function or module-level attributes so that they don't get ignored when doing LTO. http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=21471 I have an initial patch (attached to this email) which enables clang/llvm to recognize one command line option, write it to the IR, and read it out in a

...gt; +#include "llvm/IR/Attributes.h" > >> +#include "llvm/IR/Module.h" > >> + > >> +using namespace llvm; > >> + > >> +static std::map<std::string, bool> FunctionBoolAttrs; > >> +static std::map<std::string, bool> ModuleBoolAttrs; > >> + > > > > @Chris, should these be using ManagedStatic? > > > > _______________________________________________ > > LLVM Developers mailing list > > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu <mailto:LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu> http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu <htt...

.../IR/Attributes.h" >> >> +#include "llvm/IR/Module.h" >> >> + >> >> +using namespace llvm; >> >> + >> >> +static std::map<std::string, bool> FunctionBoolAttrs; >> >> +static std::map<std::string, bool> ModuleBoolAttrs; >> >> + >> > >> > @Chris, should these be using ManagedStatic? >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > LLVM Developers mailing list >> > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu <mailto:LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu> htt...

...; + >>>>>>>> >> +using namespace llvm; >>>>>>>> >> + >>>>>>>> >> +static std::map<std::string, bool> FunctionBoolAttrs; >>>>>>>> >> +static std::map<std::string, bool> ModuleBoolAttrs; >>>>>>>> >> + >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > @Chris, should these be using ManagedStatic? >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> > _______________________________________________ >>&...

...>>> >> +using namespace llvm; >>>>>>>>>> >> + >>>>>>>>>> >> +static std::map<std::string, bool> FunctionBoolAttrs; >>>>>>>>>> >> +static std::map<std::string, bool> ModuleBoolAttrs; >>>>>>>>>> >> + >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > @Chris, should these be using ManagedStatic? >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > _________________...

...sing namespace llvm; >>>>>>>>>>>> >> + >>>>>>>>>>>> >> +static std::map<std::string, bool> FunctionBoolAttrs; >>>>>>>>>>>> >> +static std::map<std::string, bool> ModuleBoolAttrs; >>>>>>>>>>>> >> + >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>>>> > @Chris, should these be using ManagedStatic? >>>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>&gt...