Displaying 20 results from an estimated 37609 matches for "modifi".
Did you mean:
modify
2020 Jul 18
2
[PATCH v2] drm/nouveau: Accept 'legacy' format modifiers
Accept the DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK()
family of modifiers to handle broken userspace
Xorg modesetting and Mesa drivers. Existing Mesa
drivers are still aware of only these older
format modifiers which do not differentiate
between different variations of the block linear
layout. When the format modifier support flag was
flipped in the nouveau kernel dri...
2020 Jul 30
2
[PATCH v3] drm/nouveau: Accept 'legacy' format modifiers
Accept the DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK()
family of modifiers to handle broken userspace
Xorg modesetting and Mesa drivers. Existing Mesa
drivers are still aware of only these older
format modifiers which do not differentiate
between different variations of the block linear
layout. When the format modifier support flag was
flipped in the nouveau kernel dri...
2020 Jul 27
2
[PATCH v2] drm/nouveau: Accept 'legacy' format modifiers
On 7/23/20 9:06 PM, Ben Skeggs wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Jul 2020 at 13:34, James Jones <jajones at nvidia.com> wrote:
>>
>> Accept the DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK()
>> family of modifiers to handle broken userspace
>> Xorg modesetting and Mesa drivers. Existing Mesa
>> drivers are still aware of only these older
>> format modifiers which do not differentiate
>> between different variations of the block linear
>> layout. When the format modifier suppo...
2007 Oct 08
2
[LLVMdev] Can't bootstrap llvm-gcc-4.0 for x84_64
I've been unable to bootstrap llvm-gcc-4.0 or -4.2 for x86_64
for some weeks now. The current problem is this:
[x86_64-mod-dbg]: ./xgcc -B./
-B/install.modified.debug/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/
-isystem /install.modified.debug/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/include
-isystem /install.modified.debug/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/sys-include
-L/tmp/ptmp/dag/build.llvm-gcc-4.0.modified.deb...
2020 Jul 29
2
[PATCH v2] drm/nouveau: Accept 'legacy' format modifiers
...;jajones at nvidia.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 7/23/20 9:06 PM, Ben Skeggs wrote:
> > > On Sat, 18 Jul 2020 at 13:34, James Jones <jajones at nvidia.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Accept the DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK()
> > >> family of modifiers to handle broken userspace
> > >> Xorg modesetting and Mesa drivers. Existing Mesa
> > >> drivers are still aware of only these older
> > >> format modifiers which do not differentiate
> > >> between different variations of the block linear
> &g...
2007 Sep 20
2
[LLVMdev] Building on x86-64
...lib64/libltdl.so.3.1.0
/usr/lib64/libltdl.so.3.1.0
Is this a known problem? I'm not very familiar with how libtools works so I'm
a bit hesitant to hack up ltmain.sh.
-Dave
llvm[2]: Linking Debug+Checks executable tblgen
/tmp/ptmp/dag/build.llvm.modified.debug/mklib --tag=CXX --tag=disable-shared
--mode=link /tools/llvm-tools/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/g++
-I/tmp/ptmp/dag/build.llvm.modified.debug/utils/TableGen
-I/users/dag/projects/llvm-project.modified/llvm/trunk/utils/TableGen
-I/tmp/ptmp/dag/build.llvm.modified.debug/include
-I/users...
2020 Jul 30
0
[PATCH v4] drm/nouveau: Accept 'legacy' format modifiers
Accept the DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK()
family of modifiers to handle broken userspace
Xorg modesetting and Mesa drivers. Existing Mesa
drivers are still aware of only these older
format modifiers which do not differentiate
between different variations of the block linear
layout. When the format modifier support flag was
flipped in the nouveau kernel dri...
2020 Jul 24
0
[PATCH v2] drm/nouveau: Accept 'legacy' format modifiers
On Sat, 18 Jul 2020 at 13:34, James Jones <jajones at nvidia.com> wrote:
>
> Accept the DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK()
> family of modifiers to handle broken userspace
> Xorg modesetting and Mesa drivers. Existing Mesa
> drivers are still aware of only these older
> format modifiers which do not differentiate
> between different variations of the block linear
> layout. When the format modifier support flag was
> fli...
2010 Apr 17
1
Error message when trying to install Rcmdr
I am trying to install Rcmdr on my ubuntu machine, but keep getting the
following error messages:
ERROR: failed to lock directory
?/home/thedoctor/R/i486-pc-linux-gnu-library/2.10? for modifying
Try removing ?/home/thedoctor/R/i486-pc-linux-gnu-library/2.10/00LOCK?
ERROR: failed to lock directory
?/home/thedoctor/R/i486-pc-linux-gnu-library/2.10? for modifying
Try removing
2007 Oct 08
0
[LLVMdev] Can't bootstrap llvm-gcc-4.0 for x84_64
On Oct 8, 2007, at 12:50 PM, David Greene wrote:
> I've been unable to bootstrap llvm-gcc-4.0 or -4.2 for x86_64
> for some weeks now. The current problem is this:
>
> [x86_64-mod-dbg]: ./xgcc -B./
> -B/install.modified.debug/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/x86_64-unknown-
> linux-gnu/bin/
> -isystem /install.modified.debug/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/x86_64-
> unknown-linux-gnu/include
> -isystem /install.modified.debug/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/x86_64-
> unknown-linux-gnu/sys-include
> -L/tmp/ptmp/da...
2020 Jul 30
0
[PATCH v3] drm/nouveau: Accept 'legacy' format modifiers
On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 10:26:17AM -0700, James Jones wrote:
> Accept the DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK()
> family of modifiers to handle broken userspace
> Xorg modesetting and Mesa drivers. Existing Mesa
> drivers are still aware of only these older
> format modifiers which do not differentiate
> between different variations of the block linear
> layout. When the format modifier support flag was
> fli...
2020 Jul 29
0
[PATCH v2] drm/nouveau: Accept 'legacy' format modifiers
...2020 at 04:51, James Jones <jajones at nvidia.com> wrote:
>
> On 7/23/20 9:06 PM, Ben Skeggs wrote:
> > On Sat, 18 Jul 2020 at 13:34, James Jones <jajones at nvidia.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Accept the DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK()
> >> family of modifiers to handle broken userspace
> >> Xorg modesetting and Mesa drivers. Existing Mesa
> >> drivers are still aware of only these older
> >> format modifiers which do not differentiate
> >> between different variations of the block linear
> >> layout. When...
2020 Jul 29
0
[PATCH v2] drm/nouveau: Accept 'legacy' format modifiers
...te:
> > >
> > > On 7/23/20 9:06 PM, Ben Skeggs wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 18 Jul 2020 at 13:34, James Jones <jajones at nvidia.com> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> Accept the DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK()
> > > >> family of modifiers to handle broken userspace
> > > >> Xorg modesetting and Mesa drivers. Existing Mesa
> > > >> drivers are still aware of only these older
> > > >> format modifiers which do not differentiate
> > > >> between different variations of the...
2011 Apr 14
1
modify particular factor levels
...ion,
modify.levels <- function(f, modify=list()){
## levels that will not be changed
names.old.levels <- setdiff(levels(f), unlist(modify))
## as a named list
old.levels <- as.pairlist(names.old.levels)
names(old.levels) <- names.old.levels
## union of unchanged levels and modified ones
levels(f) <- modifyList(old.levels, modify)
f
}
f <- factor(LETTERS[1:4])
f2 <- modify.levels(f, list(aa = "A", cc="C"))
It seems to work, but the original order of the levels is changed.
Have I missed a better way of doing this manipulation?
Best regards...
2013 Jan 21
4
[LLVMdev] Embed LLVM/Clang in our project
On 1/21/2013 2:01 AM, Óscar Fuentes wrote:
> Ashok Nalkund <ashoknn at qti.qualcomm.com> writes:
>
>> I was using the find_package(LLVM llvm/share/llvm/cmake) and
>> llvm_map_components_to_libraries(REQ_LLVM_LIBRARIES jit native) to get
>> the libraries to link against. This works well for the libLLVM*
>> libraries, but how do I implement similar find stuff for
2007 Oct 08
2
[LLVMdev] Can't bootstrap llvm-gcc-4.0 for x84_64
...se file a bugzilla report.
Evan, are you "3 addrifying" 32-bit adds into a 32-bit LEA on x86-64?
Could this be the problem? (iirc, it wants you to use eax = LEA rsi, rdi)
-Chris
>> I also see warnings like this:
>>
>> [x86_64-mod-dbg]: ./xgcc -B./
>> -B/install.modified.debug/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/x86_64-unknown-
>> linux-gnu/bin/
>> -isystem /install.modified.debug/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/x86_64-
>> unknown-linux-gnu/include
>> -isystem /install.modified.debug/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/x86_64-
>> unknown-linux-gnu/sys-include
&g...
2020 Jul 18
1
[PATCH] drm/nouveau: Accept 'legacy' format modifiers
On 7/17/20 12:47 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 11:57:57AM -0700, James Jones wrote:
>> Accept the DRM_FORMAT_MOD_NVIDIA_16BX2_BLOCK()
>> family of modifiers to handle broken userspace
>> Xorg modesetting and Mesa drivers.
>>
>> Tested with Xorg 1.20 modesetting driver,
>> weston at c46c70dac84a4b3030cd05b380f9f410536690fc,
>> gnome & KDE wayland desktops from Ubuntu 18.04,
>> and sway 1.5
>
> Just bikes...
2001 Aug 07
3
Packages: What expressions are allowed outside/before .First.lib?
...e should have
"executable" code? Is it also true that "outside" .First.lib, only function
declarations and objects assignments such as '.conflicts.OK <- TRUE' should
be used?
Q2. Is it considered ok to use attr() outside .First.lib? I would like set
an attribute 'modifiers' to all my functions as they are declared. I have
tried it and it work. This is an example of how one of my generated package
files looks like:
callMe0 <- function(x)
cat("hey\n")
attr(callMe0, "modifiers") <- c("private")
callMe <- function...
2019 Dec 11
2
[PATCH 3/3] drm/nouveau: Support NVIDIA format modifiers
On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 4:04 PM James Jones <jajones at nvidia.com> wrote:
>
> Allow setting the block layout of a nouveau FB
> object using DRM format modifiers. When
> specified, the format modifier block layout and
> kind overrides the GEM buffer's implicit layout
> and kind. The specified format modifier is
> validated against he list of modifiers supported
> by the target display hardware.
>
> Signed-off-by: James Jones &l...
2008 Jul 04
4
[LLVMdev] Exact meaning of byval
...;between the caller and the callee" part. The
way I see this, the responsibility for the copying should be with either the
caller or the callee, not somewhere in between. In particular, I think byval
could either mean:
a) The callee is not allowed to modify the argument. If the original code
modifies the argument, the callee should make a copy and modify that
instead.
b) The caller will always pass in a copy of the object, which the callee is
free to modify and will be thrown away afterwards.
In both cases, it seems that byval argument must always be a valid pointer.
From the code, I sus...