search for: mo

This is from the current CVS: % make ... In file included from config.h:629, from /home/mo/project/openssh_cvs/includes.h:20, from /home/mo/project/openssh_cvs/scp.c:77: /home/mo/project/openssh_cvs/defines.h:208: warning: redefinition of `clock_t' /usr/include/time.h:60: warning: `clock_t' previously declared here gcc -o scp scp.o -L. -L/usr/local/ssl/lib -L/u...

The marilith boxes use a conserver (http://www.conserver.com/) setup for serial access. Our installation exports the logs via http allowing us to grab them with wget. Sending debug keys with is handled separately via xenuse. xenuse ultimately speaks to the conserver too but it abstracts away the IP and port to use so this is preferred. With these changes the correct Serial hostprop for a

...in August, I sense some need to double check with you whether it is OK to start making a heavy use of MachineOperand TargetFlags? We do seem to have a compelling reason for it in Hexagon, and I wanted to make sure that it is OK with everyone. I plan to use it for attributing target specific info to MOs and in more general case to MIs that those MOs belongs to. Part of my question would be - is it still unsafe to use it for MO_Register and if so, then why? Thanks a lot. Sergei --- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation > -----Or...

Hi there, I am wondering if it is possible to do an xyplot with two y-axes. I'd like to print two parameters in a time series but they both have different scales. Which parameter in xyplot can I add to achieve this result? Thanks a lot for any help. Antje [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

I'm trying to convince my employer to deploy an Asterisk based system, but one member of the leadership team is against it. The rest of the team is for it, but he's convinced them that we should find other organisations in the Joplin, MO area who are using Asterisk first because, "we don't want to be the first in our area." I can't fathom how that's relevant, since I have shown them case studies from much larger organisations than us around the country, and personally talked with other organisations using Ast...

...odeGen/DeadMachineInstructionElim.cpp#L142 Here I've refactored the code into a minimal (noinline) function that still triggers the problem. xfunc2() and xfunc3() are also noinline. The problem goes away if either isReg() or isDef() is marked noinline. void xfuncx(const MachineOperand &MO, const TargetRegisterInfo *TRI, BitVector &LivePhysRegs) { if (MO.isReg() && // <<<<------ problem reported here MO.isDef()) { xfunc2(MO, TRI, LivePhysRegs); } else { xfunc3(MO, LivePhysRegs); } } The asm is below. Maybe I've been s...

...e that encodes the immediate in an extra instruction slot (what we call a constant extended instruction). We can encode that with a target flag on the immediate machine operand. So the patch you quoted is not a problem. The quoted patch only prohibits the use of flags on register operands (that is MO.isReg()==true) because some of the code in CodeGen that deals with register operands does not appropriately handle target flags on the register operand (it might not transfer the information from an "old" operand to an "updated" operand). I guess I am asking you to clarify what...

Hi, R600 hardware (Radeon gfx card) does neither have a NEG nor an ABS instruction ; however any sources operand can be negated/abs'd by setting a bit for every source operand in the final bytecode (but not DST). A good way of modeling this behavior in LLVM is by using TargetFlag on operand. Currently the R600 LLVM backend in Mesa lower NEG and ABS DAG instruction to a MOV + TargetFlag using customEmitter pass. This emulates the existence of a NEG/ABS instruction, but is not optimal as it costs an extra (often uneeded) MOV...

...which calls a routine in MipsMCCodeEmmitter.cpp. That routine ############################################################## unsigned MipsMCCodeEmitter:: getBranchTargetOpValue(const MCInst &MI, unsigned OpNo, SmallVectorImpl<MCFixup> &Fixups) const { const MCOperand &MO = MI.getOperand(OpNo); if (MO.isReg()) { unsigned Reg = MO.getReg(); unsigned RegNo = getMipsRegisterNumbering(Reg); return RegNo; } else if (MO.isImm()) { return static_cast<unsigned>(MO.getImm()); } else if (MO.isFPImm()) { return static_cast<unsigned>(APF...

...Ok. > > I tried to do it using a pass after register allocation, lowering NEG/ABS instructions. > However I met a problem : apparently getNextOperandForReg() can returns a MachineOperand before the one I'm processing. > > The following code snippet : > > > void R600ModifiersPropagation::substituteReg(MachineOperand &def_MO, unsigned new_reg, unsigned char flag) { > MachineOperand * MO = def_MO.getNextOperandForReg(); > while (MO && MO->isUse()) { > MachineOperand *next_MO = MO->getNextOperandForReg(); > MO->dump(); &g...

I''m new with ROR and am confused about passing parameters to functions. I have a controller called Schedules and that calles a calendar helper for a view called show_cal.rhtml. I need to be able to pass in a specified month and year to get the correct schedule calendar to display in the view. I''m just starting with this and am simply trying to display the parameters I''m trying to pass in. Here''s what I''ve got so far: Controller: class SchedulesController < ApplicationCo...

...pr 15, 2008, at 4:24 AM, Nicolas Geoffray wrote: > OK, here's a new patch that adds the infrastructure and the > implementation for X86, ARM and PPC of GetInstSize and > GetFunctionSize. Both functions are virtual functions defined in > TargetInstrInfo.h. > > For X86, I moved some commodity functions from X86CodeEmitter to > X86InstrInfo. > > What do you think? > > Nicolas > > > Evan Cheng wrote: >> >> I think both of these belong to TargetInstrInfo. And yes, it's a >> good idea, there are other passes which can make...

...ybe evan can comment on this? regards arnold Index: lib/Target/X86/X86CodeEmitter.cpp =================================================================== --- lib/Target/X86/X86CodeEmitter.cpp (revision 45541) +++ lib/Target/X86/X86CodeEmitter.cpp (working copy) @@ -601,7 +601,8 @@ if (MO.isMachineBasicBlock()) { emitPCRelativeBlockAddress(MO.getMBB()); } else if (MO.isGlobalAddress()) { - bool NeedStub = !IsStatic || + bool NeedStub = Opcode == X86::TAILJMPd || Opcode == X86::TAILJMPr || + Opcode == X86::TAILJMPm || !IsStatic...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi! I'm test CentOS in this moment, before used White Box and I had the same problem when I change from normal user to postgres: [puc at carcel ]$ su - postgres Password: free(): invalid pointer 0x7ed1d0! free(): invalid pointer 0x9af7930! Segmentation fault [puc at carcel ]$ I'm using LDAP, but user "puc" is a...

...library and having problems with labeling the values on the x-axis. Using the reproducible example below, how can I have the text (jan, feb,mar, etc.) in place of 1:12. Thanks, AB x <- c(seq(0,0.5,by=0.1),seq(0.5,0,by=-0.1)) ci <- rnorm(12,0,sd=0.1) xupper <- x + ci xlower <- x - ci mo.fac <- c("jan", "feb", "mar", "apr", "may", "jun", "jul", "aug", "sep", "oct", "nov", "dec") foo <- data.frame(mo=1:12,mo.fac,x,xupper,xlower) # example 1: works...

Hi all, I'm trying to use an old MO drive in Centos5.0. It's connected to an adaptec scsi card. From dmesg, the card seems to be recognized, but it doesn't "create" the sda device from the MO drive. Is there any more steps I must do? From Yahoo search (since it has older archive than google), it seems that Linux...

...urs in a console R session. Sending the file to the console via less reveals no strange characters in the first line. The data is California statewide rainfall which was screen captured from the Western Regional Climate Center web site. First 15 lines including header line: "yr","mo","Data","in" 1895,1,8243,8.243 1895,2,2265,2.265 1895,3,2340,2.34 1895,4,1014,1.014 1895,5,1281,1.281 1895,6,58,0.058 1895,7,156,0.156 1895,8,140,0.14 1895,9,1087,1.087 1895,10,322,0.322 1895,11,1331,1.331 1895,12,2428,2.428 1896,1,7156,7.156 1896,2,712,0.712 1896,3,2982,2....

OK, here's a new patch that adds the infrastructure and the implementation for X86, ARM and PPC of GetInstSize and GetFunctionSize. Both functions are virtual functions defined in TargetInstrInfo.h. For X86, I moved some commodity functions from X86CodeEmitter to X86InstrInfo. What do you think? Nicolas Evan Cheng wrote: > > I think both of these belong to TargetInstrInfo. And yes, it's a good > idea, there are other passes which can make use of them, e.g. branch > shortening. >...

...is clear that the C++ code (below) never calls isDef() when > isReg() returns false, as it does here. > > So now back to the asm: > > 0000000000000000 > <_Z6xfuncxPKN4llvm14MachineOperandEPKNS_18TargetRegisterInfoEPNS_9BitVectorE>: > > 0: b8 ff 00 00 01 mov $0x10000ff,%eax > 5: 23 07 and (%rdi),%eax > 7: 3d 00 00 00 01 cmp $0x1000000,%eax > c: 75 05 jne 13 > <_Z6xfuncxPKN4llvm14MachineOperandEPKNS_18TargetRegisterInfoEPNS_9BitVectorE+0x13> > > e:...

Dear Sir/Madam, I got some problem about using R. I am a student, and need to use R a lot. But sometimes when I am working in computer lab, we can not install some particular pacakges by ourselves because of the previliges. Can the folder of Librabry of R, move to, for instance the personal folder, my documents... then we can install any specified package? Best regards, ========================================================= Daoping Mo Via Real Collegio 30, CORPIE 10024, Moncalieri, Italy. Tel: +39 - 329-1865124 (Better after GMT 15:00, thanks!) E...