search for: ml310e

On 11/01/2015 12:07 PM, Karel Hendrych wrote: > Hi, just a heads-up: 3.18.21 didn't boot up on HP ML310e Gen8 v2, SATA drives in AHCI mode, / on software raid 1, no LVM. It ended up in kernel panic > with unable to mount root fs. Attached. No difference in grub kernel/xen settings. > > I didn't investigate the things deeper so far. 4.4.3-3/3.18.17 is booting fine. > > Any similar...

I have released to the master mirror the following packages for Xen4CentOS: b518e3b0fd4f735b34d7784815793cb787283d9029776bd9794cedeb274b9204 kernel-3.18.21-16.el6.x86_64.rpm 4b17373a0ef6806b26d02eb87fc299020beb60b6e31ed08a9c57d30a1410fbe7 kernel-devel-3.18.21-16.el6.x86_64.rpm cacedf6771849f7525145ad4ed7d36a2cad5b49b546173bb7c132b236cb7ac49 kernel-doc-3.18.21-16.el6.noarch.rpm

Hi, just a heads-up: 3.18.21 didn't boot up on HP ML310e Gen8 v2, SATA drives in AHCI mode, / on software raid 1, no LVM. It ended up in kernel panic with unable to mount root fs. Attached. No difference in grub kernel/xen settings. I didn't investigate the things deeper so far. 4.4.3-3/3.18.17 is booting fine. Any similar experience? BR -- Ka...

Indeed, a good catch. Module initramfs line was missing at 3.18.21 grub config. Thanks! -- Karel On 1.11.2015 21:46, Sarah Newman wrote: > On 11/01/2015 12:07 PM, Karel Hendrych wrote: >> Hi, just a heads-up: 3.18.21 didn't boot up on HP ML310e Gen8 v2, SATA drives in AHCI mode, / on software raid 1, no LVM. It ended up in kernel panic >> with unable to mount root fs. Attached. No difference in grub kernel/xen settings. >> >> I didn't investigate the things deeper so far. 4.4.3-3/3.18.17 is booting fine. >> &gt...

...FFWX-68TZ4N0 Red Pro drives c. 40 Windows clients on a 1g connection to BackupPC server (in name only) d. Backups scheduled over a 12 hour period in the evening, e. TWO off-site backups via USB 3.0 interface and external drives using rsync (takes roughly 6-9 hours depending on load) f. ProLiant ML310e Gen8 v2, Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1220 v3 @ 3.10GHz, 8g ram, SSD / drive 3. YES, I've had to use it for BMR and it does work! a. A BMR over the network is slow but works. Particular machine was a 10/100 client. Been using it for not quite 3 years now after finally giving up on BackupPC. I w...

-----Original Message----- From: CentOS [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Nicolas Kovacs Sent: Sunday, December 17, 2017 12:52 PM To: centos at centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] Offsite hosted backup solutions > Can't say about Windows clients, but for all my Linux machines, I'm > using Rsnapshot, either on public or LAN servers. Basically uses rsync > over SSH,

My manager just tasked me at looking at this, for one team we're supporting. Now, he'd been thinking of bacula, but I see their Windows binaries are now not-free, so I'm looking around. IIRC, Les thinks highly of backuppc; comments on that, or other packaged solutions? mark