Displaying 10 results from an estimated 10 matches for "mitchbnj_removethi".
Did you mean:
mitchbnj_removethis
2002 Nov 19
0
[faslink@excite.com: FW: W2k wkstation no longer recognized by samba pdc]
Errand of mercy :-).
Jeremy.
----- Forwarded message from "mitchbnj_removethis@excite.com" <faslink@excite.com> -----
Delivered-To: jra@samba.org
To: jra@samba.org
Subject: FW: W2k wkstation no longer recognized by samba pdc
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: ID = 643734ca1432f536042764450a0cebd...
2002 Nov 19
0
(fwd from jra@samba.org) [faslink@excite.com: FW: W2k wkstation no longer recognized by samba pdc]
...n <jra@samba.org> -----
From: jra@samba.org (Jeremy Allison)
Subject: [faslink@excite.com: FW: W2k wkstation no longer recognized by samba pdc]
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2002 12:02:21 -0700
To: samba@samba.org
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Errand of mercy :-).
Jeremy.
----- Forwarded message from "mitchbnj_removethis@excite.com" <faslink@excite.com> -----
Delivered-To: jra@samba.org
To: jra@samba.org
Subject: FW: W2k wkstation no longer recognized by samba pdc
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: ID = 643734ca1432f536042764450a0cebd...
2002 Aug 20
1
explain please? was: pblms with samba 2.X /3.x and NT--W2k
...e a parameter I've come across before..
Thanks again for ALL of us with this similar problem
Mitch B
Subject: RE: [Samba] pblms with samba 2.X /3.x and NT--W2k
try adding to your smb.conf file
use spnego = no
Kristyan Osborne - IT Technician
size=2Longhill High School
391672
From: mitchbnj_removethis@excite.com
Subject: [Samba] pblms with samba 2.X /3.x and NT--W2k
There is OBVIOUSLY something wrong somewhere. EITHER a WHOLE
bunch of us are stupider than we thought, the
documentation left off a step, or there is something
SO blatently obvious that we are ALL staring it in
the face a...
2002 Aug 16
0
RE: 1st thought: was: help (Still) w2k pro no longer trusted by 2.2.3 pdc
...l )
NO, BUT I DID A /BIN/FALSE for login shell
You most probably know more than me, **(Nah)
Have you tried writing to someone on the team?
TRIED IT, NO RESPONSE
One thing I'm sure of is that your problem is definitely Computer Trust Account related.
I AGREE (GRIN)
--- On Fri 08/16, mitchbnj_removethis@excite.com wrote:
From: mitchbnj_removethis@excite.com [mailto: faslink@excite.com]
To: trevor@systematic.co.za, faslink@excite.com
Cc: lists@samba.org
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 10:45:10 -0400
Subject: 1st thought: was: help (Still) w2k pro no longer trusted by 2.2.3 pdc
> Thanks for the su...
2002 Aug 19
3
pblms with samba 2.X /3.x and NT--W2k
There is OBVIOUSLY something wrong somewhere.
EITHER a WHOLE bunch of us are stupider than we thought, the documentation left off a step, or there is something SO blatently obvious that we are ALL staring it in the face and missing it inches in front of our faces.
This is exactly what I've had, (BUT I *D*I*D* have it running ok ...)
and I STILL havent figured it out yet,...
Subject:
2002 May 09
1
try Again?: Setting up net of W2K boxes with Samba PDC
OK: Here's my question.
I am setting up a brand new PDC and network of
(ugh) between 20 and 50 win2k clients, and want a samba server.
I'd like to be able to set this up so all admin is done on the samba server.
Is this where I would use Winbind?
Can someone point me to a good tutorial?
Users will be in different user groups. and must be able to log on with profile from any
2002 Sep 10
0
Re: More on Samba 3.0 vs Samba TNG
...something?
I can't give it to you now. But I will
plan to develop it for the future.
If this is a general-type request, we may
get many more of these in the future. If
this is a way to "sell" TNG for
development to the boss, then a slick pres.
may be nice, I guess.
dereck
--- "mitchbnj_removethis@excite.com"
<faslink@excite.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks Peter. But What I'm seeking (I guess?) is the
> holy Grail?
> Re: Samba 3.0 vs Samba TNG
>
> I asked: Can someone from the team(s) explain the
> differences in the
> current (v2.2x) version of Samba (as we...
2002 May 01
5
Roaming profiles problem
Hey all,
I've got a few WinXP workstations logging into a 2.2.4pre (CVS from April
30th, around 8 p.m. PDT) PDC, and I'm having some sort of odd problem with
roaming profiles.
The XP workstations can successfully (it seems) retrieve and save thier
profiles to the samba box; however, if I log off a user, say "gary", from
one workstation, and travel to the next one, and log in
2002 Jun 03
0
WAS: Newbie: can't connect localhost:901 - help
Don't feel stupid. I'd guess you're using 2.4 kernel and not the 2.2 kernel?
In 2.2 services default to using inet.d
In 2.4 services default to using xinetd to start stuff.
You need to go to /etc/xinet.d and make sure the file swat
has a "disable=no" in it.
As a matter of fact, for security purposes, I'd do a vi * in that directory (/etc/xinet.d ) and make sure
2002 Aug 16
0
help (Still) w2k pro no longer trusted by 2.2.3 pdc
Hi. I am still having problems:
Quick synopsis:
NT workstation cannot have machine account successfully trusted by PDC.
: Latest news:
I stopped my servers, cleaned all logs off, commented out most shares from smb.conf
and found….
SAME Problem.
I also discovered that I was getting an error message from syslog about my user VISITOR guest user) but it DOES exist.
Please help?!!
Remember, I’ve