search for: miguelmedalha

I need to install CentOS 5.2 on a IBM Server xSeries 226, which comes with a IBM SERVERAID 6i RAID card. I think it is not a true hardware RAID card. I has, nevertheless, an interesting feature: 128MB of cache with battery backup. I launched the CentOS boot DVD and CentOS correctly identified the card and the RAID 5 array as configured by the controller's BIOS. My question now is:

> Full ack! +1 > > Regards > Tim > > Am 12. Februar 2015 22:12:45 MEZ, schrieb Miguel Medalha > <miguelmedalha at sapo.pt>: >> >> I am using a Samba 4.1.16 as an Active Directory domain controller. >> >> After a lot of time complaining to myself that my users' properties >> sheet in ADUC did not contain the Unix Attributes tab, it finally >> occurred to me that I...

Let me be the first (maybe): CentOS 5.2 is here (at least): http://mirror.chpc.utah.edu/pub/centos/5.2/ Thank you all who worked on it! -------------- next part -------------- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG. Version: 8.0.100 / Virus Database: 270.4.1/1513 - Release Date: 22-06-2008 7:52

I'm struggling with trying to create a unified, ldap-backed for my home network. I have an existing directory that handles my posix logins correctly and I'm able to auth smb users against those accounts, but I'm not able to join any machines to the directory. It would be profoundly helpful to see a ldif dump of a working configuration. Surely others have created similar setups at home

...permitted too. But you were faster. :-) Possibly it's also worth to mention here: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_AD_management_from_windows I don't have a computer right now and it's difficult/not so comfortable to edit with a mobile. Am 14. Februar 2015 00:11:08 MEZ, schrieb miguelmedalha at sapo.pt: > >> Full ack! +1 >> >> Regards >> Tim >> >> Am 12. Februar 2015 22:12:45 MEZ, schrieb Miguel Medalha >> <miguelmedalha at sapo.pt>: >>> >>> I am using a Samba 4.1.16 as an Active Directory domain controller. >&gt...

On 21/01/15 13:32, miguelmedalha at sapo.pt wrote: > It is always useful to read the release notes ;-) > > With Samba 4.2, if you want to use the winbind daemon instead of the > internal winbind you have to include: > > server services -winbind winbindd ... > > That is the least of his problems, he needs...

Thanks. I think I misunderstanding the release notes. -----Original Message----- From: samba-bounces at lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of miguelmedalha at sapo.pt Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 9:32 PM To: Kelvin Yip Cc: samba Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba4.2rc4 with winbindd in config cannot start samba process It is always useful to read the release notes ;-) With Samba 4.2, if you want to use the winbind daemon instead of the internal winbind...

Hello, everyone I edit the lp_load() of the samba source that this fuction may modify the smb.conf sometimes. How can I let all the samba daemons know that? Restarting samba service may cause all link break up. Thanks! From miguelmedalha at sapo.pt Sun Jul 20 06:29:09 2008 From: miguelmedalha at sapo.pt (Miguel Medalha) Date: Sun Jul 20 06:29:42 2008 Subject: [Samba] How to inform all the daemons I have modified the smb.conf file In-Reply-To: <3460102.355581216531620041.JavaMail.coremail@bj126app80.126.com> References: <...

> >> I've connected a Windows 7 client and logged in with a roaming profile >> user, copied some 4GB of data in the profile and logged out. Surely enough, >> the data was synchronized but when I login and logout again, the profile >> gets copied on the samba server in full versus just the modified data. > >> For instance, if the profile on the server has 4GB

I am using a Samba 4.1.16 as an Active Directory domain controller. After a lot of time complaining to myself that my users' properties sheet in ADUC did not contain the Unix Attributes tab, it finally occurred to me that I should look again into Windows 7 >> Control Panel >> Programs and Features >> Turn Windows Features on and off. Lo and behold, there it is: under

How do you enable local profile creation on machines connected to a samba PDC? I thought it would be automatic, but it doesn't seem to be. If there isn't a roving profile, windows complains it can't find your profile on the server, then instead of creating a local one, it throws up this message: "Windows cannot find the local profile and is logging you on with a temporary

I'm confused about which UUID to use to identify a software RAID in fstab. lsblk -fs shows: md127p1 ext4 c43af789-82aa-49e9-a8ed-acd52b1cdd58 /y --- md127 ext4 39c20575-4257-4fd7-b5c8-8a15757e9e8e --- sdb1 linux_r hostname:0 af77830e-8cfd-9012-62ce-e57105c3bf6c --- sdb --- sdc1 linux_r hostname:0 af77830e-8cfd-9012-62ce-e57105c3bf6c

Thanks. On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 4:26 PM, Miguel Medalha <miguelmedalha at sapo.pt> wrote: > Assuming your raid group is /dev/md127, you can run: > > ls -l /dev/disk/by-uuid > > or > > blkid /dev/md127 > > and use the ID both will show for /dev/md127 > > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > C...

these articles could help you. first one is english and second is turkish http://www.alexwyn.com/computer-tips/centos-samba4-active-directory-domain-controller http://www.koraykey.com/?p=3842 From: Miguel Medalha <miguelmedalha at sapo.pt> To: chris weisiger <cweisiger at bellsouth.net> Cc: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> Sent: Sunday, February 7, 2016 2:11 AM Subject: Re: [CentOS] C7 AD server >> Try this. I have been thinking of trying it on C7. >> http://www.linuxhelp.net/f...

Full ack! +1 Regards Tim Am 12. Februar 2015 22:12:45 MEZ, schrieb Miguel Medalha <miguelmedalha at sapo.pt>: > >I am using a Samba 4.1.16 as an Active Directory domain controller. > >After a lot of time complaining to myself that my users' properties >sheet in ADUC did not contain the Unix Attributes tab, it finally >occurred to me that I should look again into Win...

...he rfc2307. All secondary DCs will replicate this by DRS. All I'm missing is to get the max uid/gid out of idmap.ldb to know what id will be used next. It's not that important but not irrelevant. Anyone knows where to find it? Am 11. Dezember 2014 21:16:38 MEZ, schrieb Miguel Medalha <miguelmedalha at sapo.pt>: >> >> Advantage of my solution will be that no Unix attributes have to be >set >in ADUC. >> >> If you are interested I will post it when I'm finished. >> > >Please do! > >Thank you >-- >To unsubscribe from this list go t...

...nal Message----- From: samba-bounces at lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of Rowland Penny Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 9:39 PM To: samba at lists.samba.org Subject: Re: [Samba] Samba4.2rc4 with winbindd in config cannot start samba process On 21/01/15 13:32, miguelmedalha at sapo.pt wrote: > It is always useful to read the release notes ;-) > > With Samba 4.2, if you want to use the winbind daemon instead of the > internal winbind you have to include: > > server services -winbind winbindd ... > > That is the least of his problems, he needs...

> I tried it and it did not work the same as winbindd on a memberserver. > I still got UIDs starting with 3.000.000 > Thank you for your answer. I am asking because at the moment I don't have a spare machine to test it. Of course you did include "-winbind +winbindd" in a "server services" line in smb.conf, didn't you? Well, my systems work well as they

AFAIK one cannot use folder redirection if the samba server is offline. Or am I wrong? On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 2:24 AM, <miguelmedalha at sapo.pt> wrote: > > >> I've connected a Windows 7 client and logged in with a roaming profile >>> user, copied some 4GB of data in the profile and logged out. Surely >>> enough, >>> the data was synchronized but when I login and logout again, the p...

You meant making disk Z: as \\server\folder, did you ? 2015-12-06 18:19 GMT+03:00 Miguel Medalha <miguelmedalha at sapo.pt>: > > There are some soft where is not address line where you can put > > \\server\folder address to access or you can not get access resource via > > \\server\folder, it only via computer list. > > Why not map the share to a drive letter in those cases? I jus...