search for: microchips

I saw a discussion that looked exactly like the issue that I'm having, but turned out to be a divide by zero error instead. I apologize if this issue as already been addressed. I am trying to run an IDE called MPLAB(v7.20) under wine(v20050524). I can get the IDE up and it will successfully call another program called mpasmwin.exe which assembles the file. This mpasmwin program generates

Dear dev team, I have following question: Microchip is offering IT'S speex library here: http://www.microchip.com/stellent/idcplg?IdcService=SS_GET_PAGE&nodeId=1406&dDocName=en023610for it's microcontrollers. Is this a derivate of your sources? If it is, then you should do some checking because I could not find any references to yor credits. Best regards, Marjan --------------

Hello, I try to use Microchips MPLAB IDE 7.22 with wine 0.9.3 in contrary to the AppDB it doesn't work, it hangs during the first splash screen. When I try it with WINEDEBUG=warn+all the last message I get is: warn:gdi:GDI_GetObjPtr Invalid handle 0x62c I already registered all the .dlls as advised in the AppDB and also...

I have this working on one computer but not the other. Both are running Debian etch, although one is on a slightly older kernel which I can't change for many reasons. Anyway, the program is mplab and it installs perfectly, but when I try to run it the following errors are generated ~/.wine/drive_c/Program Files/Microchip/MPLAB IDE/Core$ ./MPLAB.exe Invoking /usr/lib/wine/wine.bin

Hmmm.... it's a shame.... what are the minimum requirements for Fixed Point Speex? John Villar Gerente de Proyectos Computadores Flor Hard Soft 2058 C.A. www.florhard.com Alain wrote: > Hi, no chance to run it on anything from Microchip, theyr best > processor is 16 Mips 8 bits only. For what I have been readind on this > list for more than a year you need a lot more than

Hello, We have an excellent opportunity for compiler enthusiasts having significant experience in writing compilers for microcontrollers. The job is based in Bangalore, India and would require someone who is willing to relocate here and is authorized to work here without sponsorship. Development experience on LLVM compiler system would be a plus. Required education is a graduate or

In the Arizona Microchip site they wrote: Microhip is studing to make a MPLAB version for Linux, but the company XXXXXX have a solution for this. But in the XXXX's page say in the HOME : "We have not SW's for Linux" Well, I've tryed to install the Mplab for Win16 in the wine but when acessing serial port it craches the communication, Solution: a upgrade in my computer to a

I am trying to install Microchip's MPLab package (a set of tools for working with PIC microcontrollers) with the latest Wine from CVS (at least, latest as of yesterday morning). I've been running Wine for a while, so I already have an existing Wine registry. I don't have a Windows install on the machine. The installer (InstallShield) unpacks, runs, and then pops up a dialog

Thank you Chris, That is great news... So his modifications are in llvm-2.2? How has Christopher tested them? Are there attributes or intrinsics that I can also use? A. -----Original Message----- From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Chris Lattner Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 9:23 PM To: LLVM Developers Mailing List Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] C

Christopher, Thank you for all the work :-) Regarding the regression testing, it is in our plan to contribute into LLVM. The current state of our project is not in the form that we can do this at this time though, but I'm hoping that we can get some minimal functionality into LLVM before LLVM 2.3 (at most LLVM 2.4) release. Looks like you have also (at least on your local project) taken

I was browsing through Microchips' website and came upon their Speex library. They are charging for it and looks like it is also not open source. http://www.embeddedstar.com/press/content/2005/6/embedded18391.html scroll down to the paragraph about pricing. - farhan

So does that mean that LLVM can't lower automatically to 8-bit values? I tried defining 8-bit pointers in the subtarget using "p:8:8:8" but it asserts at line 566 of TargetData.cpp in the default case of TargetData::getIntPtrType() Is it difficult to add 8-bit support? A. -----Original Message----- From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On

I am trying to verify the generated DAG after converting from llvm to DAG, however I'm not sure if this is correct or not. Here is the situation: In order to get LLVM to lower to 8-bit I have to define only 8-bit registers and the pointer size also to be 8-bit. Doing so, the attached DAG is generated for a load:i16. I have problem understanding this DAG in two places: 1)As you can see the

Thank you Evan, I added the return Type::Int8Ty to the switch statement to get it to work. I don't know if this can have other consequences, I haven't yet verified if the generated Legalized DAG is correct though. A. -----Original Message----- From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Evan Cheng Sent: Monday, October 01, 2007 3:23 PM To:

I need to perform call graph analysis (after all modules are merged) to find which function calls which, and depending on the attributes that each function has and what functions call it, I may need to clone it and modify some of calls to that function to call the cloned function. Currently we are doing this in few acrobatic moves that span from an llvm-ld pass (to do call graph analysis) all the

ExpandOp is not called at all. In SelectionDAGLegalize::HandleOp() only the ValueType is considered in the switch statement to decide if it is legal or promote or expand. As I trace back (correct me if I'm wrong) these values are set in TargetLowering::computeRegisterProperties() and it is based on the largest register class (in my case the smallest possible pointer size, 16-bit) So it reduces

On Mon, 2008-08-18 at 08:50 -0700, Eli Friedman wrote: > On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 6:31 AM, <Sachin.Punyani at microchip.com> wrote: > > assert(Res.getValueType() == N->getValueType(0) && N->getNumValues() == 1 && > > "Invalid operand expansion"); > > > > LOAD node has two values but the assertion checks N->getNumValues() == 1 >

There is a ~/llvm-2.8/lib/Target/PIC16/ backend in llvm-2.8. It doesn't appear to be present in llvm-2.9. Has that backend been dropped? Graham

On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 10:26 PM, Graham Reitz <grahamreitz at me.com> wrote: > There is a ~/llvm-2.8/lib/Target/PIC16/ backend in llvm-2.8.  It doesn't appear to be present in llvm-2.9. > > Has that backend been dropped? Yes; commit message for r116190: "Per discussion with Sanjiv, remove the PIC16 target from mainline. When/if it comes back, it will be largely a rewrite,

Alireza, I have added full support for embedded C address spaces to the LLVM IR (see http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#t_pointer). I have not added any support for the fractional types and their operators, though I think this would simply require adding the necessary intrinsics, which is one of the easier things to add to LLVM. Given that LLVM takes the approach of modeling these kinds