search for: microchip

...never make it back to the MPLAB IDE. After about 10 seconds, MPLAB outputs: Thread would not exit normally. Could not read language tool output from pipe. (5) I ran the following command as it was suggested to in the other thread that I read: ~/.wine/c$ WINEDEBUG=+process,+exec wine ./Programme/Microchip/MPLAB\ IDE/Core/MPLAB.exe and got this: trace:process:init_current_directory starting in L"C:\\" 0x10 trace:process:find_exe_file looking for L"./Programme/Microchip/MPLAB IDE/Core/MPLAB.exe" trace:process:find_exe_file Trying native exe L"C:\\Programme\\Microchip\\MPLAB...

Dear dev team, I have following question: Microchip is offering IT'S speex library here: http://www.microchip.com/stellent/idcplg?IdcService=SS_GET_PAGE&nodeId=1406&dDocName=en023610for it's microcontrollers. Is this a derivate of your sources? If it is, then you should do some checking because I could not find any references to yor...

Hello, I try to use Microchips MPLAB IDE 7.22 with wine 0.9.3 in contrary to the AppDB it doesn't work, it hangs during the first splash screen. When I try it with WINEDEBUG=warn+all the last message I get is: warn:gdi:GDI_GetObjPtr Invalid handle 0x62c I already registered all the .dlls as advised in the AppDB and also...

...on one computer but not the other. Both are running Debian etch, although one is on a slightly older kernel which I can't change for many reasons. Anyway, the program is mplab and it installs perfectly, but when I try to run it the following errors are generated ~/.wine/drive_c/Program Files/Microchip/MPLAB IDE/Core$ ./MPLAB.exe Invoking /usr/lib/wine/wine.bin ./MPLAB.exe ... fixme:ole:CoInitializeSecurity ((nil),-1,(nil),(nil),1,3,(nil),0,(nil)) - stub! err:ole:get_inproc_class_object couldn't load in-process dll L"C:\\Program Files\\Microchip\\MPLAB IDE\\PICkit 2\\PICkit2.dll" e...

Hmmm.... it's a shame.... what are the minimum requirements for Fixed Point Speex? John Villar Gerente de Proyectos Computadores Flor Hard Soft 2058 C.A. www.florhard.com Alain wrote: > Hi, no chance to run it on anything from Microchip, theyr best > processor is 16 Mips 8 bits only. For what I have been readind on this > list for more than a year you need a lot more than that. > > Even theyr DSPic has a clck of only 25MHz, I don even understand why > they bother to make a DSP like that... > > John Villar e...

...nd would require someone who is willing to relocate here and is authorized to work here without sponsorship. Development experience on LLVM compiler system would be a plus. Required education is a graduate or post-graduate degree in Compute Science. Regards, Soubiya Human Resource Microchip Technology (I) Pvt Ltd Phone : 080- 41828400 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20080116/dcc8be99/attachment.html>

In the Arizona Microchip site they wrote: Microhip is studing to make a MPLAB version for Linux, but the company XXXXXX have a solution for this. But in the XXXX's page say in the HOME : "We have not SW's for Linux" Well, I've tryed to install the Mplab for Win16 in the wine but when acessing serial...

I am trying to install Microchip's MPLab package (a set of tools for working with PIC microcontrollers) with the latest Wine from CVS (at least, latest as of yesterday morning). I've been running Wine for a while, so I already have an existing Wine registry. I don't have a Windows install on the machine. The installe...

...Message----- From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Chris Lattner Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 9:23 PM To: LLVM Developers Mailing List Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] C embedded extensions and LLVM On Jan 29, 2008, at 9:56 AM, <Alireza.Moshtaghi at microchip.com> <Alireza.Moshtaghi at microchip.com > wrote: > Christopher, > It has been a while since we last talked about C embedded extensions > in > LLVM, I was moving back and froth from project to project and didn't > get > a chance to follow up. I was wondering if...

...mind sharing more details about your project, particularly how soon you need the front end support and if you would be able to provide a way (ideally contributed back to LLVM) to regress these features going forward? -- Christopher Lamb On Jan 30, 2008, at 9:53 AM, <Alireza.Moshtaghi at microchip.com> <Alireza.Moshtaghi at microchip.com> wrote: Thank you Chris, That is great news... So his modifications are in llvm-2.2? How has Christopher tested them? Are there attributes or intrinsics that I can also use? A. -----Original Message----- From: llvmdev-bounces at c...

I was browsing through Microchips' website and came upon their Speex library. They are charging for it and looks like it is also not open source. http://www.embeddedstar.com/press/content/2005/6/embedded18391.html scroll down to the paragraph about pricing. - farhan

...Message----- From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Chris Lattner Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 5:01 PM To: LLVM Developers Mailing List Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Lowering operations to 8-bit! On Sep 28, 2007, at 4:53 PM, <Alireza.Moshtaghi at microchip.com> <Alireza.Moshtaghi at microchip.com> wrote: > ExpandOp is not called at all. > In SelectionDAGLegalize::HandleOp() only the ValueType is > considered in > the switch statement to decide if it is legal or promote or expand. > As I trace back (correct me if I'm w...

...ginal Message----- From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Evan Cheng Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2007 11:22 PM To: LLVM Developers Mailing List Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Lowering operations to 8-bit! On Oct 3, 2007, at 3:21 PM, Alireza.Moshtaghi at microchip.com wrote: > Thank you Evan, > I added the return Type::Int8Ty to the switch statement to get it to > work. > I don't know if this can have other consequences, I haven't yet > verified > if the generated Legalized DAG is correct though. If this works, please submit a p...

...Original Message----- From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Evan Cheng Sent: Monday, October 01, 2007 3:23 PM To: LLVM Developers Mailing List Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Lowering operations to 8-bit! On Oct 1, 2007, at 11:33 AM, Alireza.Moshtaghi at microchip.com wrote: > So does that mean that LLVM can't lower automatically to 8-bit values? There is no inherent reason. LLVM should be able to lower to 8-bit values. It's probably a bug somewhere. In TargetLowering.h: bool isTypeLegal(MVT::ValueType VT) const { return !MVT::isExtende...

...better answer for us. I guess the most important question is how best (if possible) can I clone a function before or during codegen. Currently we are cloning the function in AsmPrinter but it does not look good to me. Any thoughts? Alireza Moshtaghi Senior Software Engineer Development Systems, Microchip Technology

...Message----- From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Chris Lattner Sent: Friday, September 28, 2007 1:55 PM To: LLVM Developers Mailing List Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Lowering operations to 8-bit! On Sep 28, 2007, at 1:10 PM, <Alireza.Moshtaghi at microchip.com> <Alireza.Moshtaghi at microchip.com> wrote: > Attached please find the gdb backtrace dump and the postscript file of > the DAG right before assertion. > The red Node is the current Node in LegalizeOp() Okay, this is the problem. LegalizeOp should only be called on a no...

On Mon, 2008-08-18 at 08:50 -0700, Eli Friedman wrote: > On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 6:31 AM, <Sachin.Punyani at microchip.com> wrote: > > assert(Res.getValueType() == N->getValueType(0) && N->getNumValues() == 1 && > > "Invalid operand expansion"); > > > > LOAD node has two values but the assertion checks N->getNumValues() == 1 > > which is not lettin...

There is a ~/llvm-2.8/lib/Target/PIC16/ backend in llvm-2.8. It doesn't appear to be present in llvm-2.9. Has that backend been dropped? Graham

On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 10:26 PM, Graham Reitz <grahamreitz at me.com> wrote: > There is a ~/llvm-2.8/lib/Target/PIC16/ backend in llvm-2.8.  It doesn't appear to be present in llvm-2.9. > > Has that backend been dropped? Yes; commit message for r116190: "Per discussion with Sanjiv, remove the PIC16 target from mainline. When/if it comes back, it will be largely a rewrite,

...mind sharing more details about your project, particularly how soon you need the front end support and if you would be able to provide a way (ideally contributed back to LLVM) to regress these features going forward? -- Christopher Lamb On Jan 30, 2008, at 9:53 AM, <Alireza.Moshtaghi at microchip.com> <Alireza.Moshtaghi at microchip.com> wrote: > Thank you Chris, > That is great news... > So his modifications are in llvm-2.2? > How has Christopher tested them? Are there attributes or intrinsics > that > I can also use? > > A. > > -----Original Mes...