Displaying 10 results from an estimated 10 matches for "mi3".
Did you mean:
mi
2018 Nov 27
2
[RFC] Tablegen-erated GlobalISel Combine Rules
...I1),
(isScalarType type:$D),
(isLargerType type:$D, type:$S)),
(apply (G_ZEXT $D, $S, (debug_locations $MI0, $MI1)))>;
def : GICombineRule<(defs reg:$D, reg:$S, instr:$MI0, instr:$MI1, instr:$MI2, instr:$MI3, debug_expr:$DNewExpr),
(match (G_ZEXT $t0, $S):$MI0,
(G_TRUNC $D, $t0):$MI1,
(DBG_VALUE $t0):$MI2,
(DBG_VALUE $D):$MI3,
(isScalarType type:$D),...
2018 Nov 30
2
[RFC] Tablegen-erated GlobalISel Combine Rules
..._ZEXT $t0, $S):$MI0,
>> (G_TRUNC $D, $t0):$MI1),
>> (isScalarType type:$D),
>> (isLargerType type:$D, type:$S)),
>> (apply (G_ZEXT $D, $S, (debug_locations $MI0, $MI1)))>;
>> def : GICombineRule<(defs reg:$D, reg:$S, instr:$MI0, instr:$MI1, instr:$MI2, instr:$MI3, debug_expr:$DNewExpr),
>> (match (G_ZEXT $t0, $S):$MI0,
>> (G_TRUNC $D, $t0):$MI1,
>> (DBG_VALUE $t0):$MI2,
>> (DBG_VALUE $D):$MI3,
>>...
2012 Jul 06
0
[LLVMdev] MachineOperand: Subreg defines and the Undef flag
...nstance, consider this code (part of a single block loop).
MI1:: %vreg7:subreg_loreg<def,undef>, %vreg30<def> = POST_LDriuh %vreg30,
2, // Post Inc. Load. Vreg7 is a 64bit reg.
MI2:: %vreg7:subreg_hireg<def> = COPY %vreg32:subreg_hireg<kill>
// This is the A3 = B0 above.
MI3:: %vreg31<def> = ADD_rr %vreg31<kill>, %vreg32:subreg_loreg<kill>
// Use the lo subreg that was setup in MI1:
....
....
MI4:: %vreg32<def> = COPY %vreg7; //Not trivial
because 7 is not killed. This is the Copy C i.e. B1=A3.
....
MI5:: Conditional...
2012 Jul 05
3
[LLVMdev] MachineOperand: Subreg defines and the Undef flag
Hi Jakob,
Thanks for your reply.
>
> The <undef> flag goes on NewMI_1 because the virtual register B isn't live
> before that instruction.
>
> But you probably shouldn't be doing this yourself. Your NewMI code isn't
in
> SSA form because B has multiple definitions. Just use a REG_SEQUENCE
> instruction, and let the register allocator do the transformation
2011 Oct 17
1
plotting issues with PCA
...ot;LM3", "DB1" ,"DB2" ,"DB3", "DM1" , "DM2" ,
"DM3" , "FI1", "FI2", "BKI1", "BKI2", "BKO1", "BKO2", "BKO3",
"SUR1","MI1","MI2","MI3","BHE1","BHE2","BHE3","BHW1","BHW2","BHW3","HAL1","HAL2","HAL3","HAL4","HAL5","HAL6","HAL7","DOH1","DOH2","DOH3","DOH4",&quo...
2018 Nov 27
3
[RFC] Tablegen-erated GlobalISel Combine Rules
...ocations $DL0, $DL1)))>;
However, the former is more compact when DBG_VALUE is involved since naming the instruction gives access to three of the four pieces of data we need to pass on to the apply step:
def : GICombineRule<(defs reg:$D, reg:$S, instr:$MI0, instr:$MI1, instr:$MI2, instr:$MI3, debug_expr:$DNewExpr),
(match (G_ZEXT $t0, $S):$MI0,
(G_TRUNC $D, $t0):$MI1,
(DBG_VALUE $t0):$MI2,
(DBG_VALUE $D):$MI3,
(isScalarType type:$D),...
2012 Jul 06
2
[LLVMdev] MachineOperand: Subreg defines and the Undef flag
...art of a single block loop).
>
> MI1:: %vreg7:subreg_loreg<def,undef>, %vreg30<def> = POST_LDriuh %vreg30,
> 2, // Post Inc. Load. Vreg7 is a 64bit reg.
> MI2:: %vreg7:subreg_hireg<def> = COPY %vreg32:subreg_hireg<kill>
> // This is the A3 = B0 above.
> MI3:: %vreg31<def> = ADD_rr %vreg31<kill>, %vreg32:subreg_loreg<kill>
> // Use the lo subreg that was setup in MI1:
> ....
> ....
> MI4:: %vreg32<def> = COPY %vreg7; //Not trivial
> because 7 is not killed. This is the Copy C i.e. B1=A...
2018 Nov 12
3
[RFC] Tablegen-erated GlobalISel Combine Rules
> On Nov 10, 2018, at 03:28, Nicolai Hähnle <nhaehnle at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thank you for the detailed reply! There's a lot to digest :) Let me try to address most of it.
>
>
> [snip]
>>> I also think you should have 'ins' and 'outs' separately; after all, a predicate may have to do a combined check on two matched registers / operands,
2005 May 23
3
Betr.: VPN
IF you are not stuck to IPSec, you might want to take a look at OpenVPN (www.openvpn.org). I found OpenVPN easier to install than FreeSWAN (an IPSEC VPN) and have setup an OpenVPN solution between my German office and our mainoffice in a matter of hours.
Thom van der Boon
E-Mail: Thom.van.der.Boon at vdb.nl
=====
Thom.H. van der Boon b.v.
Havens 563
Jan Evertsenweg 2-4
NL-3115 JA Schiedam
2008 Jun 30
4
Rebuild of kernel 2.6.9-67.0.20.EL failure
Hello list.
I'm trying to rebuild the 2.6.9.67.0.20.EL kernel, but it fails even without
modifications.
How did I try it?
Created a (non-root) build environment (not a mock )
Installed the kernel.scr.rpm and did a
rpmbuild -ba --target=`uname -m` kernel-2.6.spec 2> prep-err.log | tee
prep-out.log
The build failed at the end:
Processing files: kernel-xenU-devel-2.6.9-67.0.20.EL
Checking