Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "mexperimental".
Did you mean:
experimental
2020 Jan 16
7
[RFC] Upstream development of support for yet-to-be-ratified RISC-V extensions
...oesn't seem to be a strong motivation for requiring a custom LLVM build
to force this. However, such unratified extensions shouldn't be accessible via
normal RISC-V ISA naming strings (e.g. "rv32imafdc"), and instead flags of the
form `-riscv-experimental-vector-ext` in LLVM and `-mexperimental-vector-ext`
in Clang should be used (i.e. option 3)). We discussed this in our weekly call
however, and there were voices advocating either option 2 or 3. Input welcome.
If going down the option 3 route, the flags could be made more discouraging
through requiring an additional `-riscv-enable-exper...
2020 Jan 21
6
[RFC] Upstream development of support for yet-to-be-ratified RISC-V extensions
...motivation for requiring a custom LLVM build
> > to force this. However, such unratified extensions shouldn't be accessible via
> > normal RISC-V ISA naming strings (e.g. "rv32imafdc"), and instead flags of the
> > form `-riscv-experimental-vector-ext` in LLVM and `-mexperimental-vector-ext`
> > in Clang should be used (i.e. option 3)). We discussed this in our weekly call
> > however, and there were voices advocating either option 2 or 3. Input welcome.
> >
> > If going down the option 3 route, the flags could be made more discouraging
> > thr...