search for: experimental

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 6949 matches for "experimental".

2017 Apr 10
10
RFC: Plan for removing components from namespace std::experimental
As part of the work on C++17, WG21 released a series of "Technical Specifications", (TS) which added proposed new features to the standard library. These were all defined in the namespace 'std::experimental' (and namespaces inside of that). Then, much of these features were merged into the main standard, and became part of namespace 'std'. Libc++ now has two implementations of several of these, and they are diverging (because changes were made to the ones in the main standard, but not to...
2008 Aug 26
0
Processed (with 58 errors): The possibility of attack with the help of symlinks in some Debian
Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org: > tags 496359 secuirity Unknown tag/s: secuirity. Recognized are: patch wontfix moreinfo unreproducible fixed potato woody sid help security upstream pending sarge sarge-ignore experimental d-i confirmed ipv6 lfs fixed-in-experimental fixed-upstream l10n etch etch-ignore lenny lenny-ignore. Bug#496359: The possibility of attack with the help of symlinks in some Debian packages There were no tags set. Tags added: > tags 496360 secuirity Unknown tag/s: secuirity. Recognized are: p...
2017 Apr 10
2
[cfe-dev] RFC: Plan for removing components from namespace std::experimental
I second Justin's suggestion, but would that happen in LLVM 5 or 6? Just as something to consider, it may also cause spurious errors for people who are relying on the at-version-stability of experimental libraries, causing them to turn off warnings for deprecated code. As C Bergstrom has said, users buy into experimental libraries with the knowledge that the interface or behaviour could change at a moment's notice, so it might not be an issue, but it is worth considering. On Tue., 11 Apr. 201...
2010 May 06
0
xen_4.0.0-1~experimental.1_amd64.changes is NEW
libxen-dev_4.0.0-1~experimental.1_amd64.deb to main/x/xen/libxen-dev_4.0.0-1~experimental.1_amd64.deb libxenstore3.0_4.0.0-1~experimental.1_amd64.deb to main/x/xen/libxenstore3.0_4.0.0-1~experimental.1_amd64.deb (new) xen-docs-4.0_4.0.0-1~experimental.1_all.deb optional doc Documentation for Xen This package contains all the...
2010 Apr 28
2
Xen 4.0 test packages
Hi I finally did the merge for Xen 4.0. For this I decided to rename the source package back to xen. The packages are available via http://hermes.jura.uni-tuebingen.de/~blank/debian/xen-test. ec1482e14f2515bd6878da0d2229b725993601fa libxen-dev_4.0.0-1~experimental.1_amd64.deb 7c394f7158ca387225935f3bbe26bdc5518a1934 libxenstore3.0_4.0.0-1~experimental.1_amd64.deb b747970d0959ab3169267cfe354ae3427d58afb4 xen_4.0.0-1~experimental.1.debian.tar.gz 73fa58ac9a087e412583901e577b494813fa0446 xen_4.0.0-1~experimental.1.dsc aadfa4bda44c00be6ac8e5c10a2bd1003c04f042...
2011 Jan 23
0
Error for compiling Rquantlib package 0.3.5 under Window 7 64bits
Hi, I am trying to build a binary of Rquantlib package 0.3.5 under Window 7 64bits. I am using mingw gcc version 4.5.1 (tdm64-1) which is a experimental version of 64 bits ming gcc. (http://tdm-gcc.tdragon.net/). I have successfully compiled boost 1.45 and Quantlib 1.0.1 with this gcc. And then when I tried to compile Rquantlib 0.3.5, it reports some error. The first error is like below. Please see the attachment for part of the errors compiler...
2014 Jun 06
7
[LLVMdev] Stack maps no longer experimental in 3.5
Hi all, It is my understanding that now WebKit depends on the stack map functionality in production. Also, on the mailing lists we've seen lots of users using in this feature. Can we eliminate the experimental status for 3.5? Off the top of my head, the changes needed are: - A read-through of StackMaps.rst to remove any mention of it being experimental. - Removing mention of it being experimental from http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#stack-map-intrinsics - Removing the `.experimental` from the name....
2020 Feb 12
2
Whose responsibility is it to maintain tests using experimental backends?
...aba65>, which broke an in-tree test for the AVR backend (see http://45.33.8.238/mac/7865/step_11.txt). On the review https://reviews.llvm.org/D72992, a request was made to fix the test or revert the change. This test didn't fail locally or on any of the build bots, because the AVR backend is experimental and does not run even for build that has all normal targets enabled). The fix in this case is simple, and I don't have any real issue in making it, but there's a wider principle here: if an in-tree test fails but only when experimental items are enabled, whose responsibility is it to fix t...
2018 Jan 04
0
RFC: Plan for removing components from namespace std::experimental
...10, 2017 at 1:22 PM, Marshall Clow <mclow.lists at gmail.com> wrote: > As part of the work on C++17, WG21 released a series of "Technical > Specifications", (TS) which added proposed new features to the standard > library. These were all defined in the namespace 'std::experimental' (and > namespaces inside of that). > > Then, much of these features were merged into the main standard, and > became part of namespace 'std'. Libc++ now has two implementations of > several of these, and they are diverging (because changes were made to the > ones in...
2019 Apr 04
5
[RFC] Changes to llvm.experimental.vector.reduce intrinsics
Hi all, While working on a patch to improve codegen for fadd reductions on AArch64, I stumbled upon an outstanding issue with the experimental.vector.reduce.fadd/fmul intrinsics where the accumulator argument is ignored when fast-math is set on the intrinsic call. This behaviour is described in the LangRef (https://www.llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#id1905) and is mentioned in https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36734 and further discussed...
2020 Jan 21
6
[RFC] Upstream development of support for yet-to-be-ratified RISC-V extensions
...; there doesn't seem to be a strong motivation for requiring a custom LLVM build > > to force this. However, such unratified extensions shouldn't be accessible via > > normal RISC-V ISA naming strings (e.g. "rv32imafdc"), and instead flags of the > > form `-riscv-experimental-vector-ext` in LLVM and `-mexperimental-vector-ext` > > in Clang should be used (i.e. option 3)). We discussed this in our weekly call > > however, and there were voices advocating either option 2 or 3. Input welcome. > > > > If going down the option 3 route, the flags could...
2020 Mar 20
4
Debian Buster Samba 4.12 (experimental packages) amd64/i386
Hai Guys, I've uploaded the Debian Buster samba 4.12 packages to the buster-experimental repo. These need some extra love in tests, so if your able to please these a bit. And report back to me/the samba list. ONLY amd64 and i386 Packages. (sorry armhf is still building) Repo setup. wget -O - http://apt.van-belle.nl/louis-van-belle.gpg-key.asc | apt-key add - echo "deb http:...
2019 Aug 23
0
Debian Buster 4.11Rc2 package available
...asc | apt-key add - 3) (optional) setup a header line for the repo file. echo "# AptVanBelle repo for samba." | sudo tee /etc/apt/sources.list.d/van-belle.list 4) In the line below, change the OS and/or samba version to what you want. echo "deb http://apt.van-belle.nl/debian buster-experimental main contrib non-free" | sudo tee -a /etc/apt/sources.list.d/van-belle.list As you see, the repo is : buster-experimental You can use it, but keep in mind this these "experimental" repo should NEVER be used in/with production servers. And if you use the "experimental"...
2010 Feb 16
2
[LLVMdev] Minor cosmetic issues
...- Rewriter to use: (default: local) It would probably be better to use the first style consistently throughout. In -version output, Low Level Virtual Machine (http://llvm.org/): llvm version 2.6svn Optimized build. Built Feb 14 2010(11:05:20). Registered Targets: alpha - Alpha [experimental] arm - ARM bfin - Analog Devices Blackfin [experimental] c - C backend cellspu - STI CBEA Cell SPU [experimental] cooper - PIC16 Cooper [experimental] cpp - C++ backend mips - Mips mipsel - Mipsel msil - MSIL backend msp430 - MSP430...
2016 Jul 19
2
[RFC] Make Lanai backend non-experimental
On 7/19/2016 6:12 AM, Renato Golin via llvm-dev wrote: > > I don't see why not. LGTM. Same here. -Krzysztof -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
2020 Feb 12
2
Whose responsibility is it to maintain tests using experimental backends?
https://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#new-targets says that experimental backends should be supported by an active community, in part by providing build bots and fixing bugs related to the backend. So while it doesn't *explicitly* say things about patches that only break those backends, I think reading the spirit of that policy says that it's the responsibility...
2013 Oct 18
4
[LLVMdev] [RFC] Stackmap and Patchpoint Intrinsic Proposal
On Oct 18, 2013, at 11:08 AM, Andrew Trick <atrick at apple.com> wrote: >> >> I recommend, this being the case, to replace 'webkit' with 'experimental'. Having webkit in the name implies some dependence on webkit, and there is none. Plus, this functionality will be used by outside projects as soon as it lands in trunk, and I suspect that having webkit in the initial name will end up as a naming incongruity that no one will really think is wor...
2019 Jul 05
4
cannot set filesystem permissions on shares
@Louis, thanks for your answer. I've gone through the steps I found on your site, but when I wanted to install the packages, Debian didn't found the newer packages. I tried to give the version number to the apt-get, but it didn't help. apt-get install -t o=AptVanBelle samba=4.10.5+nmu-1debian0 winbind=4.10.5+nmu-1debian0 libnss-winbind=4.10.54.10.5+nmu-1debian0
2019 Feb 09
2
how experimental are the llvm.experimental.vector.reduce.* functions?
I'm interested in using @llvm.experimental.vector.reduce.smax/umax to implement runtime overflow checking for vectors. Here's an example checked addition, without vectors, and then I'll follow the example with what I would do for checked addition with vectors. Frontend code (zig): export fn entry() void { var a: i32 = 1; v...
2017 Jan 11
10
[RFC] IR-level Region Annotations
A Proposal for adding an experimental IR-level region-annotation infrastructure ============================================================================= Hal Finkel (ANL) and Xinmin Tian (Intel) This is a proposal for adding an experimental infrastructure to support annotating regions in LLVM IR, making use of intrinsics and me...