search for: methoddefinit

...about making a new method or slot or whatever is sensible in this case. What does one make of this: > getClass(class(kinship:::plot.pedigree)) No Slots, prototype of class "function" Extends: "OptionalFunction", "PossibleMethod" Known Subclasses: Class "MethodDefinition", from data part Class "genericFunction", from data part Class "functionWithTrace", from data part Class "derivedDefaultMethod", by class "MethodDefinition" Class "MethodWithNext", by class "MethodDefinition" Class "SealedMeth...

...quot;A", y="A"), function(x, y) {}) setMethod(bar, signature(x="A", y="ANY"), function(x, y) {}) the method for signature c("A", "A") contains package information > str(getMethod(bar, c("A", "A"))) Formal class 'MethodDefinition' [package "methods"] with 4 slots ..@ .Data :function (x, y) ..@ target :Formal class 'signature' [package "methods"] with 3 slots .. .. ..@ .Data : chr [1:2] "A" "A" .. .. ..@ names : chr [1:2] "x" "y" .....

...or another 'callNextMethod'") In addition: Warning message: In if (is.na(i)) { : the condition has length > 1 and only the first element will be used 2 things about this: (1) Sure callNextMethod() needs some context in order to know what to do but it seems that the MethodDefinition object returned by selectMethod() carries that context i.e. it seems to contain all the information that callNextMethod() would need (name of the generic and defined signature) to actually work: > mymethod <- selectMethod("as.matrix", "A")...

...="classGeneratorFunction" object="classRepresentation" object="dbObjectId" object="envRefClass" object="function" (inherited from: object="ANY") object="genericFunction" object="genericFunctionWithTrace" object="MethodDefinition" object="MethodDefinitionWithTrace" object="MethodSelectionReport" object="MethodWithNext" object="MethodWithNextWithTrace" object="namedList" object="ObjectsWithPackage" object="oldClass" object="PostgreSQLDriver&qu...

...sweep.cols, recalc.after.sweep = recalc.after.sweep, ...) } .local(object, ...) } Desire to be able to access formals() for the .local() function definition, not the generic one. Have seen information desired available via "defined" slot of returned 'MethodDefinition' object, but not using the code below. ==================== library(methods) if (!isGeneric("normalize")) { ## Other packages also define this generic... setGeneric("normalize", function(object, ...) standardGeneric("normalize")) } s...

...as(list(), "A") > get(".MTable", environment(coerce))[["list#A"]] function (from, to) { obj <- new("A") as(obj, "list") <- from obj } <environment: namespace:methods> Entries in .MTable should be MethodDefinition objects (or at least that is what is usually there for methods defined via setAs). It happens that if you try to load a package that has a NAMESPACE file with a directive exportMethods(coerce) but no call to setAs then you get an error: library("hello") Error in .mergeMethodsTa...

...sweep.cols, recalc.after.sweep = recalc.after.sweep, ...) } .local(object, ...) } Desire to be able to access formals() for the .local() function definition, not the generic one. Have seen information desired available via "defined" slot of returned 'MethodDefinition' object, but not using the code below. ==================== library(methods) if (!isGeneric("normalize")) { ## Other packages also define this generic... setGeneric("normalize", function(object, ...) standardGeneric("normalize")) } s...

...w("A") > b <- new("B") > a <- b > a An object of class "B" Slot "x": numeric(0) > ## should be a ? > ## but selectMethod(...) works correct > selectMethod("<-",c("A","B")) Method Definition (Class "MethodDefinition"): function(x,value) { print("myAssign.default"); return(x); } Signatures: x value target "A" "B" defined "A" "B" What happens with the setReplaceMethod(...) call? My version is platform i686-pc-linux-gnu arch i686 os...

...statistic@avg = mean(statistic@obs) statistic@current = newData if(length(statistic@obs)==1 || is.na(statistic@beg)){ statistic@beg = newData } return(statistic) } Firstly, I know you can use methods which seems to add some value. I looked at http://developer.r-project.org/methodDefinition.html but I try setMethod("update", signature(statistic="statisticInfo", newData="numeric"), function(statistic, newData){ statistic@obs = c(statistic@obs, newData) statistic@max = max(newData, statistic@max, na.rm=T) statistic@min = min(newData, statis...

...= recalc.after.sweep, > ...) > } > .local(object, ...) > } > > > Desire to be able to access formals() for the .local() function definition, > not the generic one. Have seen information desired available via "defined" > slot of returned 'MethodDefinition' object, but not using the code below. > > > > ==================== > > library(methods) > > if (!isGeneric("normalize")) { > ## Other packages also define this generic... > setGeneric("normalize", > function(object,...

...<- new("MyClass1",a=20) > as(x,"MyClass2") An object of class "MyClass2" Slot "a": [1] "20" > tracingState(on=TRUE) [1] FALSE > getMethod("coerce",c("MyClass1","MyClass2")) Method Definition (Class "MethodDefinition"): function (from, to = "MyClass2", strict = TRUE) new(to, a = as.character(from at a)) Signatures: from to target "MyClass1" "MyClass2" defined "MyClass1" "MyClass2" > trace("coerce",browser,signature=c(&quot...

...= recalc.after.sweep, > ...) > } > .local(object, ...) > } > > > Desire to be able to access formals() for the .local() function definition, > not the generic one. Have seen information desired available via "defined" > slot of returned 'MethodDefinition' object, but not using the code below. > > > > ==================== > > library(methods) > > if (!isGeneric("normalize")) { > ## Other packages also define this generic... > setGeneric("normalize", > function(object,...

Hi, The following question might come from my (deep) misunderstanding of the concepts in the package 'methods'. I have a class 'A', and a class 'B' inheriting 'A' (so defined with 'setClass' and the parameter 'contains="A"'. The class A has a method 'mymethod'. A call to 'showMethods("mymethod")' return the

......) >> } >> .local(object, ...) >> } >> >> >> Desire to be able to access formals() for the .local() function definition, >> not the generic one. Have seen information desired available via "defined" >> slot of returned 'MethodDefinition' object, but not using the code below. >> >> >> >> ==================== >> >> library(methods) >> >> if (!isGeneric("normalize")) { >> ## Other packages also define this generic... >> setGeneric("normalize&...

Might it be an idea to make "?" a special operator akin to "+" or "[", R users could then write their own help functions - may be even making "?" generic? With the proposed xml help system one could imagine quite sophisticated context sensitive help systems. Regards, John Marsland PS this has been a very useful debate for those of us enthusiastically

Hi, I was wondering if anybody might have a reference for me: My R code is growing and getting more and more confusing. Thus, I figure it's time to switch to object-oriented again. I have done oo programming in C++ and Java before but the first few tutorial on R oo were a bit confusing for me. Is there any brief tutorial on oo programming in R especially for people who have done oo in Java

...latex EmptyMethodsList-class text html latex EnvironmentClass text html latex GenericFunctions text html latex LanguageClasses text html latex LinearMethodsList-class text html latex MethodDefinition-class text html latex MethodSupport text html latex MethodWithNext-class text html latex Methods text html latex MethodsList-class text html latex MethodsList...