search for: metager

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 47 matches for "metager".

Did you mean: meager
2016 Jan 05
1
[PATCH v2 20/32] metag: define __smp_xxx
Hi Michael, On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 09:08:22PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > This defines __smp_xxx barriers for metag, > for use by virtualization. > > smp_xxx barriers are removed as they are > defined correctly by asm-generic/barriers.h > > Note: as __smp_XX macros should not depend on CONFIG_SMP, they can not > use the existing fence() macro since that is
2016 Jan 05
1
[PATCH v2 20/32] metag: define __smp_xxx
Hi Michael, On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 09:08:22PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > This defines __smp_xxx barriers for metag, > for use by virtualization. > > smp_xxx barriers are removed as they are > defined correctly by asm-generic/barriers.h > > Note: as __smp_XX macros should not depend on CONFIG_SMP, they can not > use the existing fence() macro since that is
2015 Dec 31
0
[PATCH v2 20/32] metag: define __smp_xxx
This defines __smp_xxx barriers for metag, for use by virtualization. smp_xxx barriers are removed as they are defined correctly by asm-generic/barriers.h Note: as __smp_XX macros should not depend on CONFIG_SMP, they can not use the existing fence() macro since that is defined differently between SMP and !SMP. For this reason, this patch introduces a wrapper metag_fence() that doesn't
2015 Dec 31
0
[PATCH v2 10/32] metag: reuse asm-generic/barrier.h
On metag dma_rmb, dma_wmb, smp_store_mb, read_barrier_depends, smp_read_barrier_depends, smp_store_release and smp_load_acquire match the asm-generic variants exactly. Drop the local definitions and pull in asm-generic/barrier.h instead. This is in preparation to refactoring this code area. Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst at redhat.com> Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd at
2016 Jun 02
0
[RFC v3 30/45] metag: dma-mapping: Use unsigned long for dma_attrs
Split out subsystem specific changes for easier reviews. This will be squashed with main commit. Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski at samsung.com> --- arch/metag/kernel/dma.c | 14 +++++++------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/metag/kernel/dma.c b/arch/metag/kernel/dma.c index e12368d02155..d68f498e82a1 100644 --- a/arch/metag/kernel/dma.c
2016 Jan 04
2
[PATCH v2 20/32] metag: define __smp_xxx
On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 09:08:22PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP > +#define fence() metag_fence() > +#else > +#define fence() do { } while (0) > #endif James, it strikes me as odd that fence() is a no-op instead of a barrier() for UP, can you verify/explain?
2016 Jan 04
2
[PATCH v2 20/32] metag: define __smp_xxx
On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 09:08:22PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP > +#define fence() metag_fence() > +#else > +#define fence() do { } while (0) > #endif James, it strikes me as odd that fence() is a no-op instead of a barrier() for UP, can you verify/explain?
2016 Jan 04
1
[PATCH v2 20/32] metag: define __smp_xxx
Hi Peter, On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 02:41:28PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 09:08:22PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP > > +#define fence() metag_fence() > > +#else > > +#define fence() do { } while (0) > > #endif > > James, it strikes me as odd that fence() is a no-op instead of a > barrier() for UP, can
2016 Jan 04
0
[PATCH v2 20/32] metag: define __smp_xxx
On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 03:25:58PM +0000, James Hogan wrote: > It is used along with the metag specific __global_lock1() (global > voluntary lock between hw threads) whenever a write is performed, and by > smp_mb/smp_rmb to try to catch other cases, but I've never been > confident this fixes every single corner case, since there could be > other places where multiple CPUs
2001 Oct 10
1
Connection to server failed..
When running: smbclient \\server\tmp , I get the message: "added interface ip=my.ip.address bcast=another.ip.address nmask=255.255.255.248 Connection to server failed" Not able to locate this error in docs or o'reilly samba book, can anyone help? tia -------------------------------------------- METAgency - Media and Ecommerce Technology Ph: (775) 284-8657 Fax: (775) 284-8658
2016 Jan 13
3
[PULL] virtio: barrier rework+fixes
The following changes since commit afd2ff9b7e1b367172f18ba7f693dfb62bdcb2dc: Linux 4.4 (2016-01-10 15:01:32 -0800) are available in the git repository at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mst/vhost.git tags/for_linus for you to fetch changes up to 43e361f23c49dbddf74f56ddf6cdd85c5dbff6da: checkpatch: add virt barriers (2016-01-12 20:47:08 +0200)
2016 Jan 13
3
[PULL] virtio: barrier rework+fixes
The following changes since commit afd2ff9b7e1b367172f18ba7f693dfb62bdcb2dc: Linux 4.4 (2016-01-10 15:01:32 -0800) are available in the git repository at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mst/vhost.git tags/for_linus for you to fetch changes up to 43e361f23c49dbddf74f56ddf6cdd85c5dbff6da: checkpatch: add virt barriers (2016-01-12 20:47:08 +0200)
2015 Dec 31
54
[PATCH v2 00/34] arch: barrier cleanup + barriers for virt
Changes since v1: - replaced my asm-generic patch with an equivalent patch already in tip - add wrappers with virt_ prefix for better code annotation, as suggested by David Miller - dropped XXX in patch names as this makes vger choke, Cc all relevant mailing lists on all patches (not personal email, as the list becomes too long then) I parked this in vhost tree for now, but the
2015 Dec 31
54
[PATCH v2 00/34] arch: barrier cleanup + barriers for virt
Changes since v1: - replaced my asm-generic patch with an equivalent patch already in tip - add wrappers with virt_ prefix for better code annotation, as suggested by David Miller - dropped XXX in patch names as this makes vger choke, Cc all relevant mailing lists on all patches (not personal email, as the list becomes too long then) I parked this in vhost tree for now, but the
2016 Jan 18
0
virtio pull for 4.5 (was Re: [PULL] virtio: barrier rework+fixes)
Hi Linus, Just making sure nothing's wrong with this pull request. If there's an issue, pls let me know! Thanks! On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 06:28:55PM +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > The following changes since commit afd2ff9b7e1b367172f18ba7f693dfb62bdcb2dc: > > Linux 4.4 (2016-01-10 15:01:32 -0800) > > are available in the git repository at: > >
2015 Jan 14
1
[PULL] uaccess: fix sparse warning on get/put_user for bitwise types
Hello, Arnd, As you asked, here's a pull request. This has been in linux-next apparently with no ill effects. The following changes since commit 99975cc6ada0d5f2675e83abecae05aba5f437d2: vhost/net: length miscalculation (2015-01-07 12:22:00 +0200) are available in the git repository at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mst/vhost.git tags/uaccess_for_upstream for you to
2015 Jan 14
1
[PULL] uaccess: fix sparse warning on get/put_user for bitwise types
Hello, Arnd, As you asked, here's a pull request. This has been in linux-next apparently with no ill effects. The following changes since commit 99975cc6ada0d5f2675e83abecae05aba5f437d2: vhost/net: length miscalculation (2015-01-07 12:22:00 +0200) are available in the git repository at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mst/vhost.git tags/uaccess_for_upstream for you to
2016 Nov 16
2
[PATCH 1/1] sched: provide common cpu_relax_yield definition
No need to duplicate the same define everywhere. Since the only user is stop-machine and the only provider is s390, we can use a default implementation of cpu_relax_yield in sched.h. Suggested-by: Russell King <linux at armlinux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger at de.ibm.com> --- arch/alpha/include/asm/processor.h | 1 - arch/arc/include/asm/processor.h
2016 Nov 16
2
[PATCH 1/1] sched: provide common cpu_relax_yield definition
No need to duplicate the same define everywhere. Since the only user is stop-machine and the only provider is s390, we can use a default implementation of cpu_relax_yield in sched.h. Suggested-by: Russell King <linux at armlinux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger at de.ibm.com> --- arch/alpha/include/asm/processor.h | 1 - arch/arc/include/asm/processor.h
2016 Oct 25
0
[GIT PULL v2 5/5] processor.h: remove cpu_relax_lowlatency
As there are no users left, we can remove cpu_relax_lowlatency. Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger at de.ibm.com> --- arch/alpha/include/asm/processor.h | 1 - arch/arc/include/asm/processor.h | 2 -- arch/arm/include/asm/processor.h | 1 - arch/arm64/include/asm/processor.h | 1 - arch/avr32/include/asm/processor.h | 1 -