Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "messagepack".
2018 Mar 14
1
[Support][RFC] MessagePack reader/writer
>
> Hello all,
>
> I have prepared a small patch to add support for reading and writing
> MessagePack in LLVM, and want to propose including it in trunk.
> MessagePack is
> a binary object serialization format, with the goal of being more
> compact than
> text formats like JSON or YAML. The specification can be found at
> https://github.com/msgpack/msgpack/blob/master/spec.md
>
&g...
2018 Mar 13
0
[Support][RFC] MessagePack reader/writer
Hello all,
I have prepared a small patch to add support for reading and writing
MessagePack in LLVM, and want to propose including it in trunk.
MessagePack is
a binary object serialization format, with the goal of being more
compact than
text formats like JSON or YAML. The specification can be found at
https://github.com/msgpack/msgpack/blob/master/spec.md
There is no use of the code c...
2013 Feb 01
0
Add a customer renderer but I get missing template
...extend ActiveSupport::Concern
include ActiveModel::Serialization
included do
extend ActiveModel::Naming
end
def to_mpac(options = nil)
serializable_hash(options).to_msgpack
end
alias_method :to_msgpack, :to_mpac
def from_mpac(msg)
MessagePack.unpack(msg)
end
end
end
end
Anyone has an idea ?
Thanks.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rubyonrails-talk+unsubscrib...
2018 Mar 19
0
LLVM Weekly - #220, Mar 19th 2018
...version of googletest imported into the LLVM tree to a
non-release tagged version. This is because the last tagged release occurred
in August 2016, there have been desirable changes since then, and there is no
clear timeline on a new upstream release.
* Scott Linder has posted an RFC on [adding a MessagePack reader/write to
LLVM](http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-March/121740.html).
## LLVM commits
* lit has been extended to support reporting multiple 'micro-test' results, to
enable it to be used for collecting microbenchmark results.
[r327422](http://reviews.llvm.org/rL327422)....
2017 Jun 28
3
Next steps for optimization remarks?
> On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 8:13 AM, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote:
>
> I don't object to adding some kind of filtering option, but in general it won't help. An important goal here is to provide analysis (and other) tools to users that present this information at a higher level. The users won't, and shouldn't, know exactly what kinds of messages the tools use.