search for: memorize

...gt; Let?s flip it around: what?s your justification *for* weak passwords? >> > You don't need to write them down. The new rules are: 1. At least 8 characters. 2. Nothing that violates the pwquality rules: http://linux.die.net/man/8/pam_pwquality Are you telling me you cannot memorize a series of 8 characters that do not violate those rules? I?m the first to fight boneheaded ?password security? schemes like a required change every N weeks, but this is not that. Spend a bit of time, cook up a really good password, and then use it for the next several years. That amortizes the...

...tx() runs busypoll. >> 2. Something like zerocopy queues tx_work within 100us. >> 3. busypoll exits and call handle_tx() again. >> 4. Repeat 1-3. >> >> In this case handle_tx() does not process packets but busypoll >> essentially runs beyond 100us without endtime memorized. This may be >> just a theoretical problem, but I was worried that more code to poll tx >> queue can be added in the future and it becomes realistic. > > Yes, but consider zerocopy tends to batch 16 used packets and we will > finally finish all processing of packets. The abov...

...tx() runs busypoll. >> 2. Something like zerocopy queues tx_work within 100us. >> 3. busypoll exits and call handle_tx() again. >> 4. Repeat 1-3. >> >> In this case handle_tx() does not process packets but busypoll >> essentially runs beyond 100us without endtime memorized. This may be >> just a theoretical problem, but I was worried that more code to poll tx >> queue can be added in the future and it becomes realistic. > > Yes, but consider zerocopy tends to batch 16 used packets and we will > finally finish all processing of packets. The abov...

My 12 year old wants to learn more about servers and has memorized a lot of commands like ls, chmod, du, etc. He wants to have his own domain and server on the web and I have enough Static IP's, so why not foster this interest. I have an old ultra sparc 5. Are there any CentOS versions that support Sparc? Or recommendations? I know OpenBSD does, but I am...

...enario: 0. Set 100us busypoll for example. 1. handle_tx() runs busypoll. 2. Something like zerocopy queues tx_work within 100us. 3. busypoll exits and call handle_tx() again. 4. Repeat 1-3. In this case handle_tx() does not process packets but busypoll essentially runs beyond 100us without endtime memorized. This may be just a theoretical problem, but I was worried that more code to poll tx queue can be added in the future and it becomes realistic. >>>> Performance numbers: >>>> >>>> - Bulk transfer from guest to external physical server. >>>> ????? [G...

...enario: 0. Set 100us busypoll for example. 1. handle_tx() runs busypoll. 2. Something like zerocopy queues tx_work within 100us. 3. busypoll exits and call handle_tx() again. 4. Repeat 1-3. In this case handle_tx() does not process packets but busypoll essentially runs beyond 100us without endtime memorized. This may be just a theoretical problem, but I was worried that more code to poll tx queue can be added in the future and it becomes realistic. >>>> Performance numbers: >>>> >>>> - Bulk transfer from guest to external physical server. >>>> ????? [G...

On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 4:17 PM, Warren Young <wyml at etr-usa.com> wrote: >> > Let?s flip it around: what?s your justification *for* weak passwords? > You don't need to write them down. Or trust some 3rd party password keeper to keep them. Whereas when 'not weak' is determined by someone else in the middle of trying to complete something, you are very likely to

...ns. Having deterministic identifiers instead of pointers would aid debugging: imagine a conditional break by object identifier that has not yet been constructed, or simply trying to align two debug dumps of different kind from different runs together. Additionally, pointers are hard to read and memorize; it's hard to notice the difference between 0x7f80a28325e0 and 0x7f80a28325a0, especially when they're a few screens apart. Hence the idea: why don't we print the offset into the allocator's memory slab instead of a pointer? We use BumpPtrAllocator all over the place, which boi...

...g like zerocopy queues tx_work within 100us. >>>> 3. busypoll exits and call handle_tx() again. >>>> 4. Repeat 1-3. >>>> >>>> In this case handle_tx() does not process packets but busypoll >>>> essentially runs beyond 100us without endtime memorized. This may be >>>> just a theoretical problem, but I was worried that more code to poll tx >>>> queue can be added in the future and it becomes realistic. >>> Yes, but consider zerocopy tends to batch 16 used packets and we will >>> finally finish all proce...

...s runs. Having deterministic identifiers instead of pointers would aid debugging: imagine a conditional break by object identifier that has not yet been constructed, or simply trying to align two debug dumps of different kind from different runs together. Additionally, pointers are hard to read and memorize; it's hard to notice the difference between 0x7f80a28325e0 and 0x7f80a28325a0, especially when they're a few screens apart. >> >> Hence the idea: why don't we print the offset into the allocator's memory slab instead of a pointer? We use BumpPtrAllocator all over the pl...

Aargh, I'm about to give up. Is there someone who knows how to setup Cervisia on SuSE 9.3? I installed the one bundled with it, but somehow it refuses to produce any traffic whatsoever (I checked with 'iptraf'). No surprise I can't connect to the NUT CVS server. I'm able to use CVS by commandline (ssh keys are uploaded and I no longer have to enter a password, so this works

...>> 2. Something like zerocopy queues tx_work within 100us. >>> 3. busypoll exits and call handle_tx() again. >>> 4. Repeat 1-3. >>> >>> In this case handle_tx() does not process packets but busypoll >>> essentially runs beyond 100us without endtime memorized. This may be >>> just a theoretical problem, but I was worried that more code to poll tx >>> queue can be added in the future and it becomes realistic. >> Yes, but consider zerocopy tends to batch 16 used packets and we will >> finally finish all processing of packets...

I am using Action Mailer as stated in RoR book... the mail seems to be correctly setup.. and I get the following log.. Sent mail: Date: Wed, 9 Aug 2006 19:54:04 +0200 From: support@alemat.com To: myself@mac.com Subject: Your password is ... Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 _____________ Your username is barbare. Your new password is tDRvfzNvDF. Please login and change

...ing that command probably out of an old habit, since I've been a long-time Slackware user before. But now I wanted to dig a bit deeper, and some details puzzle me. Whereas on Slackware, 'adduser' is an interactive shell script to create a user so that basically you don't have to memorize all the 'useradd' switches, CentOS' 'adduser' is a mere symbolic link to 'useradd'. But when I add a new user (# adduser newuser), I don't use any switches, say to specify the shell, the home directory, the password expiration delay, etcetera. I understand that i...

On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 9:11 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > > On Oct 20, 2014, at 8:22 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 7:51 PM, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: >>> Hi Eric, >>> >>> Can you elaborate on your goals and what problem you are trying to solve? As

For someone that's network-aware, but hasn't sat down and plowed through umpteen SIP-related RFC's and memorized the standards, is there a good primer on troubleshooting SIP issues? I'm seeing a lot of NOTIFY/603 messages on my network between Asterisk and my Sipura 942's, for instance... Not sure what these are... perhaps the qualify keepalives? In which case, I guess the 603 is moot... but...

On Wed Oct 22 2014 at 12:33:53 PM Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote: > On Oct 20, 2014, at 10:41 PM, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com> wrote: > >>> So the storage for DataLayout right now is on a per-subtarget basis. > >>> I.e. if you don't construct one in the module the backend will make > >>> one up based on information in

.... and got the following message: error: internal error Did not find USB device 51d:2 bus:2 device:3 Er, why should it care about which bus and device this is? I thought my config would mean it would look for the device that matched the ID in the config no matter where it was. How did it learn and memorized what I guess is the old location?

...approach I could find is to compare domain ID from previous and current read. And this is my first question : is that reliable solution ? Or do you know any better ? And related question is how to resolve virDomainPtr into domain ID ? The only verified way of getting domain ID I know is to memorize it's UUID, then call virConnectListDomains , then iterate over all returned domain IDs and resolve each one's pointer using virDomainLookupByID , then get UUID by virDomainGetUUIDString get domain ID of matching UUID's . It seems too complex and I expect noticeable performance...

Hi how to flush user input before READ()? I wrote a small script to ask for user password before granting access to outside, but some telefones memorize the full user input, including "#". So, when the user press redial, for instance 5556789#123, asterisk accepts the number and the password "123" and gives access to the outside word to whomever redials that terminal. Any hints? Cheers Ethy