Displaying 10 results from an estimated 10 matches for "memoise".
2012 Apr 26
2
Memoize and vectorize a custom function
...to properly memoize my function?
There is a StackOverflow post on the subject of memoization, but it does not
help me:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7262485/options-for-caching-memoization-hashing-in-r
I haven't been able to find any other discussions on this subject. Searching
for "memoise" or "memoize" on r-bloggers.com returns zero results. Searching
for those keywords at http://r-project.markmail.org/ does not return helpful
discussions.
Here's my data:
seqs <- c("","G","C","CCC","T","","T...
2017 Sep 06
3
withr::set_makevars
...2017-08-10 CRAN (R 3.4.1)
lazyeval 0.2.0 2016-06-12 CRAN (R 3.4.0)
lintr 1.0.1 2017-08-10 CRAN (R 3.4.1)
magrittr 1.5 2014-11-22 CRAN (R 3.4.0)
memoise 1.1.0 2017-04-21 CRAN (R 3.4.0)
pkgbuild 0.0.0.9000 2017-08-31 Github (r-lib/pkgbuild at 6574561)
pkgconfig 2.0.1 2017-03-21 CRAN (R 3.4.0)
pkgload 0.0.0.9000 2017-08-31 Github (r-pkgs/pkgload...
2017 Sep 07
0
withr::set_makevars
...gt; jsonlite 1.5 2017-06-01 CRAN (R 3.4.0)
> knitr 1.17 2017-08-10 CRAN (R 3.4.1)
> lazyeval 0.2.0 2016-06-12 CRAN (R 3.4.0)
> lintr 1.0.1 2017-08-10 CRAN (R 3.4.1)
> magrittr 1.5 2014-11-22 CRAN (R 3.4.0)
> memoise 1.1.0 2017-04-21 CRAN (R 3.4.0)
> pkgbuild 0.0.0.9000 2017-08-31 Github (r-lib/pkgbuild at 6574561)
> pkgconfig 2.0.1 2017-03-21 CRAN (R 3.4.0)
> pkgload 0.0.0.9000 2017-08-31 Github (r-pkgs/pkgload at 80a6493)
> praise 1.0.0 2015...
2012 Mar 16
2
Singleton pattern
Hi all,
I know it may not have much sense thinking about a Singleton Pattern in an
R application which doesn't use any OOP facilities, however I'm curious to
know if anybody faced the same issue. I've been googling but using
"singleton pattern" as a key word leads to typical OOP languages like Java
or C++ among others.
So my problem is that I'd like to ensure some very
2020 Jun 26
2
R 4.0.0 rebuild status
On Friday, 26 June 2020 10.47.13 WEST I?aki Ucar wrote:
> I used bcond locally and wrongly assumed that fedpkg build would
> support --with BCOND and --without BCOND. Instead, the way to activate
> it is to change to "%bcond_with check" and then revert to
> "%bcond_without check". The only difference with bootstrap is that
> "bootstrap" is recognized
2016 Apr 12
0
Dispatch issue in package check?
...date 2016-04-12
Packages ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
package * version date source
devtools * 1.11.0 2016-04-12 CRAN (R 3.2.4)
digest 0.6.9 2016-01-08 CRAN (R 3.2.3)
magrittr 1.5 2014-11-22 CRAN (R 3.2.0)
memoise 1.0.0 2016-01-29 CRAN (R 3.2.3)
Rcpp 0.12.4 2016-03-26 CRAN (R 3.2.4)
roxygen2 * 5.0.1 2015-11-11 CRAN (R 3.2.2)
stringi 1.0-1 2015-10-22 CRAN (R 3.2.2)
stringr 1.0.0 2015-04-30 CRAN (R 3.2.0)
withr 1.0.1 2016-02-04 CRAN (R 3.2.3)
John Szumiloski, Ph.D.
Se...
2019 Jul 04
2
Fwd: Fedora 31 System-Wide change proposal: Automatic R runtime dependencies
...s
* R-itertools
* R-jose
* R-jpeg
* R-jqr
* R-jsonlite
* R-knitr
* R-labeling
* R-lambda.r
* R-later
* R-lazyeval
* R-lintr
* R-listenv
* R-littler
* R-lmodel2
* R-lmtest
* R-lokern
* R-lubridate
* R-maanova
* R-magrittr
* R-mapproj
* R-maps
* R-mAr
* R-markdown
* R-matrixStats
* R-measurements
* R-memoise
* R-microbenchmark
* R-mime
* R-miniUI
* R-mlbench
* R-mnormt
* R-mockery
* R-mockr
* R-msm
* R-multcomp
* R-multtest
* R-munsell
* R-mvtnorm
* R-nanotime
* R-ncdf4
* R-NISTunits
* R-nws
* R-nycflights13
* R-openssl
* R-orcutt
* R-packrat
* R-parsedate
* R-pbdRPC
* R-pbdZMQ
* R-pdftools
* R-pillar...
2018 May 30
2
Filtering using multiple rows in dplyr
Hi Folks,
I have just started using dplyr and could use some help getting unstuck. It could well be that dplyr is not the package to be using, but let me just pose the question and seek your advice.
Here is my basic data frame.
head(h)
subject ageGrp ear hearingGrp sex freq L2 Ldp Phidp NF SNR
1 HALAF032 A L A F 2 0 -23.54459 55.56005 -43.08282
2013 Oct 18
0
[LLVMdev] Contribute a new precise pointer analysis to LLVM
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 7:27 AM, lian li <lianli at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> I want to clarify that our analysis is not based on CFL-reachability.
> We apply CFL-reachability to matching context information where the
> exist from a function to a call-site must match
> the entry from the corresponding call-site.
Yes, sorry, I pulled the wrong quote, it was late.
2013 Oct 18
2
[LLVMdev] Contribute a new precise pointer analysis to LLVM
Hi Daniel,
I want to clarify that our analysis is not based on CFL-reachability.
We apply CFL-reachability to matching context information where the
exist from a function to a call-site must match
the entry from the corresponding call-site. The problem is a simple
balanced parentheses problem in CFL-reachability, and it can be
computed
efficiently.
The paper you mentioned is a very nice paper