search for: memmori

This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. Send mail to mime@docserver.cac.washington.edu for more info. --43518230-584990211-1065637857=:31587 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII I found (or rather the compiler I was using found) a few bugs in the R-1.7.1 sources. I'm not

Hi, In my application I am JITing thousands of functions, though I am doing it sequantially and running only one at a time. So it is crucial to be able to properly clean up the memory from an old JITed function when JITing and running the new one. I am using Haskell binding of LLVM and my application works OK. However, memory usage increases and never decreases during the run time of my

%FIRSTSTRU = type { i32, double, i32, i8* } struct { int var1; double var2; int var3; char *var4; }firstStru ; Could someone help? If, running a application in windows with MSVC, I allocate a memmory buffer and call a LLVM function with such buffer, there's a structure alignment problem. If the LLVM function call a C function using the same buffer, it runs fine. Any ideas?

What cpu/memmory configurations have people had good luck with for a small office asterisk server... (polycom's/poe linksys) Dell's got their $200 SC440 going again until the 12th... and I'm thinking it might be just the ticket...

Hi, Was this ever resolved? I'm curious, I'm also in a situation where there may be many (very many) JITted functions over the history of an application (which may be running for many days) Thanks On Mar 20, 2009, at 7:34 AM, George Giorgidze wrote: > Hi, > > In my application I am JITing thousands of functions, though I am > doing it sequantially and running only

Hi! Would like to initialize a huge matrix.csc (Pacakge SparseM) with all elements 0 and afterwards set a few alements nonzero. The matrix which I like to allocate is so huge that I can not use A <- matrix(a,n1,p) before: A.csr <- as.matrix.csc(A) because I can not allocate such a huge matrix A. But I believe that the much more memmory efficient model in case of csc matrix should do it for

Hello, If an ordinary user runs: -- snip -- cat > starv.c <<EOF main(){ char *point; while(1) { point = ( char * ) malloc(10000); }} EOF cc starv.c while true do ./a.out & done -- snip -- This will fast starv the operating system (FreeBSD 6.2). I have tried to limit the number of processes and the amount of memmory consumed (in login.conf). There is also a file /etc/malloc.conf

Hi, I'm having high load, choppy sound and slow responsives with an asterisk server (version 1.2.12.1) that make a peak of 90 channels (around 60 phones calling at max, isn't necessary to reach this peak to get the problem). All the traffic is SIP, with recording for every call. The server has: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 3.20GHz (with HyperThreading disabled for inestability) 4G RAM 2 DD SCSI

This Index: src/main/altrep.c =================================================================== --- src/main/altrep.c (revision 79385) +++ src/main/altrep.c (working copy) @@ -275,10 +275,11 @@ SEXP psym = ALTREP_SERIALIZED_CLASS_PKGSYM(info); SEXP class = LookupClass(csym, psym); if (class == NULL) { - SEXP pname = ScalarString(PRINTNAME(psym)); + SEXP pname =

Hello my friends, My asterisk is going down randomly, following you will find some errors that i could see in the /var/log/asterisk/message at the moment of the crash: [Feb 5 10:32:45] WARNING[6519] chan_sip.c: Maximum retries exceeded on transmission 1850202354 at 10.4.1.152 for seqno 21 (Critical Response) [Feb 5 10:32:45] WARNING[6519] chan_sip.c: Hanging up call 1850202354 at 10.4.1.152 -

Hi all, Just watching for my first time the 'oom-killer' call in a CentOS 4.2 workstation. System was running normally but with high load of nice process, iow, rosetta and seti, others appart, nautilus, etc... i realized that after a night of standby running normally, the next moorning after few manual operations from X-session in local console, it started a massive swapping, this time

Hi all, I am not able to export an ALTREP object when `gctorture` is on in the worker. The package simplemmap can be used to reproduce the problem. See the example below ``` ## Create a temporary file filePath <- tempfile() con <- file(filePath, "wrb") writeBin(rep(0.0,10),con) close(con) library(simplemmap) library(parallel) cl <- makeCluster(1) x <- mmap(filePath,

On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 06:36:18AM +0000, Li, Liang Z wrote: > > > > This ends up doing a 1MB kmalloc() right? That seems a _bit_ big. > > > > How big was the pfn buffer before? > > > > > > Yes, it is if the max pfn is more than 32GB. > > > The size of the pfn buffer use before is 256*4 = 1024 Bytes, it's too > > > small, and

On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 06:36:18AM +0000, Li, Liang Z wrote: > > > > This ends up doing a 1MB kmalloc() right? That seems a _bit_ big. > > > > How big was the pfn buffer before? > > > > > > Yes, it is if the max pfn is more than 32GB. > > > The size of the pfn buffer use before is 256*4 = 1024 Bytes, it's too > > > small, and

Hi, It's not ok yet. When a C function calls a LLVM function, or a LLVM function calls a C function, the offset of the variables are wrong. When a don't mix LLVM with C, it's ok, but I need call extern functions using structs. Ciao Manoel Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Structure alignment To: LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> Message-ID:

Thanks for the report. Will look into it when I get a chance unless someone else gets there first. A simpler reprex: ## create and serialize a memmory-mapped file object filePath <- "x.dat" con <- file(filePath, "wrb") writeBin(rep(0.0,10),con) close(con) library(simplemmap) x <- mmap(filePath, "double") saveRDS(x, file = "x.Rds") ## in a

Hi, I have found a strange thing. If I copy and paste the R source file, then the result is okay with. However, if I use R GUI (File icon and Source File), then the result is different. Please let me know possible reasons. Many thanks in advance. Best Ja-Yong [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

I need advice about What is the best practice to scale RoR project ? My current stack is: - Ruby 1.9.3 - RoR 3.2.8 - Redis DB for caching and some hot data - PostgreSQL - Resque for background jobs I am expecting a highload for my project for several month. And I need to change my architecture. Primarily, I want to change my backend architecture. I read about highload

I found that also; fixed in r79386 in the trunk. Will port to R-patched shortly. Best, luke On Thu, 29 Oct 2020, Martin Morgan wrote: > This > > Index: src/main/altrep.c > =================================================================== > --- src/main/altrep.c (revision 79385) > +++ src/main/altrep.c (working copy) > @@ -275,10 +275,11 @@ > SEXP psym =

> On Jun 11, 2019, at 6:27 AM, Guillaume Chatelet <gchatelet at google.com> wrote: > > I spent some time reading the C standard <https://web.archive.org/web/20181230041359if_/http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/abq/c17_updated_proposed_fdis.pdf>: > > 5.1.2.3 Program execution > 2. Accessing a volatile object, modifying an object, modifying a file, or calling